search for: outweight

...ommunity is deeply split when it > comes to version control. If you have a second, could you please > vote? > > http://poll.pollcode.com/i597kq The result of this poll has little value in practice. In the past the project leader stated that the opinions of the most active contributors outweight the rest of the community. So the poll should be conducted among the most active N contributors, ignoring the rest.

I'm curious to know if the LLVM community is deeply split when it comes to version control. If you have a second, could you please vote? http://poll.pollcode.com/i597kq Thanks, Greg

...t;> comes to version control. If you have a second, could you please >> vote? >> >> http://poll.pollcode.com/i597kq > > The result of this poll has little value in practice. In the past the > project leader stated that the opinions of the most active contributors > outweight the rest of the community. So the poll should be conducted > among the most active N contributors, ignoring the rest. > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc....

...al-edge-profiling option. After a profile run, I launched OPT with -profile-loader -profile-verifier flags and also passed -O3 flag. This caused OPT to give a warning "WARNING: profile information is inconsistent with the current program!" and then fail with an assert (ASSERT:inWeight and outWeight do not match opt: ProfileVerifierPass.cpp:226: void<unnamed>::ProfileVerifierPassT<FType, BType>::CheckValue(bool, const char*, <unnamed>::ProfileVerifierPassT<FType, BType>::DetailedBlockInfo*) [with FType = llvm::Function, BType = llvm::BasicBlock]: Assertion `0 &&...

Hi, As I understand, composite primary keys aren''t supported in ActiveRecord yet. May I ask if there are plans for this feature? Better yet, if this feature is under development, how''s the progress going? I''m not trying to use legacy databases. I tend to think that using multiple integer column id''s (composite primary key) are often natural way to

...rol. If you have a second, could you please >>> vote? >>> >>> http://poll.pollcode.com/i597kq >> >> The result of this poll has little value in practice. In the past the >> project leader stated that the opinions of the most active contributors >> outweight the rest of the community. So the poll should be conducted >> among the most active N contributors, ignoring the rest. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> LLVM Developers mailing list >> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu >&g...

Hello, The current png-1.2.5_4 port has no more vulnerability. It has been corrected by ache@FreeBSD.org yesterday. But when i try to install the updated port to remplace the vulnerable one this is what i am told : # make install ===> png-1.2.5_4 has known vulnerabilities: >> libpng denial-of-service. Reference:

Ever since someone told me that one of my servers might have been hacked (not the most recent instance) because I wasn't applying updates as soon as they became available, I've been logging in and running "yum update" religiously once a week until I found out how to set the yum-updatesd service to do the equivalent automatically (once per hour, I think). Since then, I've

Hi folks, This patchset adds vhost-blk support. vhost-blk is a in kernel virito-blk device accelerator. Compared to userspace virtio-blk implementation, vhost-blk gives about 5% to 15% performance improvement. Asias He (5): aio: Export symbols and struct kiocb_batch for in kernel aio usage eventfd: Export symbol eventfd_file_create() vhost: Make vhost a separate module vhost-net: Use

Hi folks, This patchset adds vhost-blk support. vhost-blk is a in kernel virito-blk device accelerator. Compared to userspace virtio-blk implementation, vhost-blk gives about 5% to 15% performance improvement. Asias He (5): aio: Export symbols and struct kiocb_batch for in kernel aio usage eventfd: Export symbol eventfd_file_create() vhost: Make vhost a separate module vhost-net: Use

I see that lighttpd 1.3.14 supports SCGI. lighttpd 1.3.14 - 2005-06-15 18:10 Changes ------- * added SCGI support via mod_scgi * added hash-based and round-robin load balancing to mod_proxy * fixed range requests larger than 2Gb * fixed compilation on Solaris * fixed endless loops in mod_fastcgi, mod_cgi and mod_proxy * fixed handling of URIs for ''+'' and