search for: outram

...es like Rules, Policy etc. If my understanding above is correct, is the only thing required to be save prior to a rebuild and re installation the /etc/shorewall folder? ( Assuming of course that all changes like Allow.xxxxx have been made in that folder only ). Thanks Stewart -- Stewart Outram UK

...Shorewall maintainer -- none of the code involved in Shorewall startup under Debian is part of the standard Shorewall distribution. - -Tom - -------- Original Message -------- Subject: [Shorewall-users] Problems with Firewall start at Boot time Date: Mon, 06 Sep 2004 16:48:16 -0400 From: Stewart Outram <stewart@soutram.fsnet.co.uk> Reply-To: Mailing List for Shorewall Users <shorewall-users@lists.shorewall.net> To: Shorewall User List <shorewall-users@lists.shorewall.net> Hi I have installed Shorewall 2.0.8 from the Debian Repositories and although the firewall is working fine...

...NOARP> mtu 1480 qdisc noop link/sit 0.0.0.0 brd 0.0.0.0 ip route show 192.168.0.0/24 dev br0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.0.1 Also, the Virtual Win2k Server is currently assigned ip 192.168.0.20 I have attached the output from shorewall status Regards Stewart -- Stewart Outram uk

...appears to fix the problem which would indicate that the problem is related to the network interfaces not being up in time. I am not sure whether this is the best fix as I believe that rcS.d starts things very early on in the Boot process which I guess is preferable for a Firewall? -- Stewart Outram UK

Hey! No, actually shorewall works very well and starts and so on... Thanks for this! Problem is that it won''t start on boot it seems. At least it doesn''t enable forwarding. However, if I do /etc/init.d/shorewall restart it enables forwarding and the rest... But not if I do /etc/init.d/shorewall start ;) Seems weird... System is Debian Sid, Shorewall is prepackaged by Debian...

....1 dev eth0 proxyarp :- #ADDRESS INTERFACE EXTERNAL HAVEROUTE PERSISTENT 192.168.0.2 eth1 eth0 No Yes 192.168.0.3 eth1 eth0 No Yes 192.168.0.5 eth1 eth0 No Yes 192.168.0.6 eth1 eth0 No Yes 192.168.0.8 eth1 eth0 No Yes 192.168.0.10 eth1 eth0 No Yes Regards Stewart -- Stewart Outram UK

...ot;br0 192.168.0.0/24 routeback" to the routestopped file. Is this correct as there doesn''t appear to be any comments in the file about adding options to this file. Should this have been added to either the interfaces or hosts file instead? Regards Stewart -- Stewart Outram UK

Hi I have been trying to get Xen running under Ubuntu. Status ------ I can get Ubuntu to boot on the patched 2.6.10 kernel however :- a) I get several boot errors thus :- Linux version 2.6.11.10-xen0 (root@gateway) (gcc version 3.3.5 (Debian 1:3.3.5-8ubuntu2)) #1 Thu Jun 9 19:58:00 BST 2005 BIOS-provided physical RAM map: Xen: 0000000000000000 - 000000000927c000 (usable) 146MB LOWMEM