search for: outputreg

...def I0 : ConstIntReg<0, "i0">; ... def I100 : ConstIntReg<100, "i100">; def R0 : TempReg<0, "r0">; def R32 : TempReg<31, "r32">; def V0 : InputReg<0, "v0">; .. def V10 : InputReg<9, "v10">; def O0 : OutputReg<0, "o0">; .. def O4 : OutputReg<4, "o4">; def FloatingPointRC : RegisterClass<packed, 128, [R0, R1, R2, ..., R32, C0, C1, ..., C200, V0, ..., V10, O1, O2, O3, O4]> { let Methods = [{ iterator allocation_order_end(MachineFunction &am...

...into the bounce buffer as well): inputRegs.es = SEG(__com32.cs_bounce); inputRegs.edi.w[0] = OFFS(__com32.cs_bounce); inputRegs.eax.w[0] = 0x0009; /* call PXE stack */ inputRegs.ebx.w[0] = 0x0071; /* PXENV_GET_CACHED_INFO opcode */ __intcall(0x22, &inputRegs, &outputRegs); However, when setup this way, 'outputRegs.eax.w[0]' contains 'PXENV_EXIT_FAILURE' (and the status field of the PXE call argument struct indicates failure as well). The instructions from the previous thread on this topic are contrary to that documentation and indicate something...

On Sat, 23 Jul 2005, Tzu-Chien Chiu wrote: > 2005/7/23, Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org>: >> What does a 'read only' register mean? Is it a constant (e.g. returns >> 1.0)? Otherwise, how can it be a useful value? > > Yes, it's a constant register. > > Because the instruction cannot contain an immediate value, a constant > value may be stored in

2005/7/23, Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org>: > > What does a 'read only' register mean? Is it a constant (e.g. returns > 1.0)? Otherwise, how can it be a useful value? Yes, it's a constant register. Because the instruction cannot contain an immediate value, a constant value may be stored in a constant register, and it's defined _before_ the program starts by

...gisterClass) isn't handled and the function returns <pair>(0, NULL). However, it is explicitly called for that constraint by llvm::SelectionDAGLowering::visitInlineAsm(): if (OpInfo.ConstraintType == TargetLowering::C_RegisterClass) GetRegistersForValue(OpInfo, SawEarlyClobber, OutputRegs, InputRegs); Assuming the correct fix is to enhance llvm::TargetLowering::getRegForInlineAsmConstraint(), can someone give me some pointers as to how to fix it? I have no experience with the code and like to get my hands dirty... Thanks, BTW: Is there a cross-reference of the project some...

I have made claims that I have not left the compiz project and that I have been maintaining it over the past 4 years, despite the lack of releases by not fault but my own. At the request of some of the original compiz developers, I am now posting a compilation of some of the contributions I've made over time, since the beginning. Since the most important contributions are code and easiest to