Displaying 20 results from an estimated 22 matches for "output_values".
Did you mean:
output_value
2015 Mar 12
1
[PATCH] generator: small optimization of pod2text cache memoization
Instead of save every time there's a new element in the cache, batch the
saving to disk every 100 changes, saving the unsaved remainder at the
exit.
While not a big optimization, this reduces a bit the disk usage during
generator run.
---
generator/utils.ml | 14 +++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/generator/utils.ml b/generator/utils.ml
index
2012 Jul 03
1
Problem using mtext to write onto a jpeg
Dear all,
I am trying to write figures directly to a file using the jpeg() function.
this_ylab=expression(paste("P",sep="")~lambda)
this_xlab=expression(rho)
jpeg("file_name.jpeg",width=100,height=100,units="mm",res=300)
plot(input_values,output_values,pch=16,cex=cex_pt,xlab="",frame.plot=T,ann=F,axes=F)
axis(side=2)
axis(side=1,labels=T,xlab="")
mtext(this_xlab,side=1,line=4,cex=2)
mtext(this_ylab,side=2,line=3,cex=2)
dev.off()
However, I get the following error message:
Error in mtext(this_xlab, side = 1, line = 4, cex =...
2006 Apr 06
4
Record retrieval in Many-to-many using :through not working
Hello,
I get an error while retrieving records from the following model structure.
Tables
foods - id, food
foodallergies - food_id, symptom_id, a few other columns
symptoms - id, symptom
Models
class Food < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :foodallergies
has_many :symptoms, :through => :foodallergies
end
class Symptom < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :foodallergies
has_many :foods,
2008 Jul 08
0
Bug with serialized columns in console ?
Hi,
I recently added 2 serialized columns in my class Server :
class Server < ActiveRecord::Base
serialize :visa, Hash
serialize :appli, Array
...
No problem in my controller and my application and everything works as
expected : Excel exports following the "visa" Hash or "appli" Array
are ok.
But since I added the visa Hash, I can''t load the record with
2006 May 20
1
acts_as_paranoid overrides ActiveRecord::Base??
Guys,
I am trying to figure out what exactly does this line do at the end of
"acts_as_paranoid" plugin?
ActiveRecord::Base.send :include, Caboose::Acts::Paranoid::ActiveRecord
My problem: I have some classes that I use acts_as_paranoid, and others
with tagging support. Classes declared as taggable, throw error, which
appears to be in the acts_as_paranoid version of the
2019 Aug 13
5
[PATCH 0/3] generator: pod2text-related improvements
- refactor memoization code
- pass pod as stdin rather than files
Pino Toscano (3):
generator: isolate memoized cache in own module
generator: adjust variable names
generator: improve pod2text invocation
generator/Makefile.am | 3 ++
generator/memoized_cache.ml | 62 +++++++++++++++++++++
generator/memoized_cache.mli | 29 ++++++++++
generator/utils.ml | 101
2006 Mar 27
2
:through and STI
Hi,
I''m trying to use :through and STI using the trunk version of Rails, but
I get the following error see bottom of this msg[1]
here are my classes.
class Player < ActiveRecord::Base
end
class Ladder < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :subscriptions
has_many :players, :through => :subscriptions
end
class SingleLadder < Ladder
end
class Subscription <
2007 Aug 15
2
has_many :through ... What am I missing?
class Ladder < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :players
has_many :users, :through => :players
end
class Player < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :users
belongs_to :ladders
end
class User < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :players
has_many :ladders, :through => :players
end
When I try the following code (on the console) I get an error:
@ladder = Ladder.find(1)
@ladder.users
I
2017 Nov 05
3
[PATCH 1/2] common/mlstdutils: Add with_open_in and with_open_out functions.
These safe wrappers around Pervasives.open_in and Pervasives.open_out
ensure that exceptions escaping cannot leave unclosed files.
---
common/mlstdutils/std_utils.ml | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------
common/mlstdutils/std_utils.mli | 12 +++++++++++
common/mltools/tools_utils.ml | 39 +++++++++++++++++-----------------
dib/dib.ml | 9 ++++----
2006 Dec 22
2
Relating Namespaced Models
I am dealing with a large project. I use a lot of STI and therfore have
a lot of models. I''d like to use namespaces to help organize my models
but am having trouble getting started.
I have a base model Term::Base located in /app/models/term/base.rb:
class Term::Base < ActiveRecord::Base
set_table_name "terms"
end
I have a non-namespaced client model:
class Client <
2017 Jul 14
0
[PATCH 02/27] daemon: Allow parts of the daemon and APIs to be written in OCaml.
This change allows parts of the daemon to be written in the OCaml
programming language. I am using the ‘Main Program in C’ method along
with ‘-output-obj’ to create an object file from the OCaml code /
runtime, as described here:
https://caml.inria.fr/pub/docs/manual-ocaml/intfc.html
Furthermore, change the generator to allow individual APIs to be
implemented in OCaml. This is picked by
2017 Jun 03
3
[PATCH 0/3]: daemon: Reimplement ‘file’ API in OCaml.
This patch series is just FYI at the moment. However it
does pass the tests.
The daemon is a self-contained program. We don't need to write it all
in C. Writing parts of it in OCaml would make it simpler and less
error-prone. In particular if the daemon was written in a more sane
programming language then we could move the inspection code to run
entirely inside the appliance, which would
2017 Jul 21
0
[PATCH v2 01/23] daemon: Allow parts of the daemon and APIs to be written in OCaml.
This change allows parts of the daemon to be written in the OCaml
programming language. I am using the ‘Main Program in C’ method along
with ‘-output-obj’ to create an object file from the OCaml code /
runtime, as described here:
https://caml.inria.fr/pub/docs/manual-ocaml/intfc.html
Furthermore, change the generator to allow individual APIs to be
implemented in OCaml. This is picked by
2017 Jun 03
12
[PATCH v2 00/12] Allow APIs to be implemented in OCaml.
Version 1 was here:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00003.html
This patch series reimplements a few more APIs in OCaml, including
some very important core APIs like ?list_filesystems? and ?mount?.
All the tests pass after this.
The selection of APIs that I have moved may look a little random, but
in fact they are all APIs consumed by the inspection code (and some
more
2017 Jun 05
19
[PATCH v3 00/19] Allow APIs to be implemented in OCaml.
v2 was here:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00008.html
This series gets as far as a working (and faster) reimplementation of
‘guestfs_list_filesystems’.
I also have another patch series on top of this one which reimplements
the inspection APIs inside the daemon, but that needs a bit more work
still, since inspection turns out to be a very large piece of code.
Rich.
2017 Jul 27
23
[PATCH v3 00/23] Reimplement many daemon APIs in OCaml.
I think this fixes everything mentioned:
- Added the Optgroups module as suggested.
- Remove command temporary files.
- Replace command ~flags with ?fold_stdout_on_stderr.
- Nest _with_mounted function.
- Rebase & retest.
Rich.
2017 Jul 21
27
[PATCH v2 00/23] Reimplement many daemon APIs in OCaml.
v1 was posted here:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00098.html
This series now depends on two small patches which I posted separately:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00207.html
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00209.html
v1 -> v2:
- Previously changes to generator/daemon.ml were made incrementally
through the patch
2017 Jul 14
45
[PATCH 00/27] Reimplement many daemon APIs in OCaml.
Previously posted as part of the mega utilities/inspection
series here:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00232.html
What I've done is to extract just the parts related to rewriting
daemon APIs in OCaml, rebase them on top of the current master, fix a
few things, and recompile and test everything.
Rich.
2017 Jun 12
32
[PATCH v5 00/32] Refactor utilities, implement some APIs in OCaml.
This is a combination of:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00046.html
[PATCH 00/12] Refactor utility functions.
plus:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00023.html
[PATCH v3 00/19] Allow APIs to be implemented in OCaml.
with the second patches rebased on top of the utility refactoring, and
some other adjustments and extensions.
This passes
2017 Jun 19
29
[PATCH v7 00/29] Reimplement inspection in the daemon.
v6 was posted here:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00103.html
and this requires the utilities refactoring posted here:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00169.html
Inspection is now complete[*], although not very well tested. I'm
intending to compare the output of many guests using old & new
virt-inspector to see if I can find any