Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "output_s".
Did you mean:
outputs
2008 Dec 11
9
PCI passthrough, poor network performance in upload direction
Hi all,
I have been having an issue for over a year with several Xen installations
and have not been able to find out if this is just something I am missing.
Basically I am trying to configure a firewall with two ethernet cards in a
domU using pci passthrough. I am hiding the Ethernet cards at boot time via
the pciback.hide kernel option.
Right now I am running Xen 3.3.0 and the two Ethernet
2012 Jun 24
3
Mail migration to dovecot with doveadm backup
Hi,
i try to migrate mails from a non dovecot imap server to a dovecot imap
server with doveadm backup as described there:
http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Migration/Dsync
i first tried (local-mailbox port 18143 is the non dovecot imap server):
/usr/bin/doveadm -o imapc_user=user at example.org -o imapc_password=imappw
-o imapc_host=local-mailbox -o imapc_features=rfc822.size -o
imapc_port=18143 -o
2008 May 05
0
[LLVMdev] optimization assumes malloc return is non-null
On May 1, 2008, at 3:39 PM, David Vandevoorde wrote:
>
> Not quite. Although there is a requirement there (and more precise
> ones in Clause 3), there is no prohibition against doing additional,
> observable stuff (e.g., log the calls) and hence allocations cannot
> be elided.
That's correct, there is no prohibition, but, if one does, there are
no requirements placed
2015 Aug 14
2
[LLVM RFC] Add llvm.typeid.for intrinsic
...ithout the 'typeid' change. Before the decoding problem solved, we
have to let user decode the BPF output themself manually or use
perf script or babeltrace script.
Thank you.
----------------- EXAMPLE -----------------
extern void output(int id, void *ptr, int size);
#define OUTPUT_STR(name) \
struct name {
#define OUTPUT_STR_END(name) \
}; \
unsigned long long __get_typeid_##name(struct name *) asm ("llvm.typeid.for.p0struct."#name); \
static inline void output_##name(struct name *str) \
{\
output(__get_typeid_##name(str), str, sizeof(struct na...
2008 May 01
3
[LLVMdev] optimization assumes malloc return is non-null
(Hi Mike!)
On May 1, 2008, at 6:11 PM, Mike Stump wrote:
> On Apr 30, 2008, at 9:26 PM, Chris Lattner wrote:
>> Personally to me, I have a bigger axe to grind with C++ operator new.
>> AFAIK, the standard doesn't give leeway to do a number of interesting
>> optimizations for new/delete because the user is explicitly allowed
>> to
>> override them and the std
llvm bpf debug info. Re: [RFC PATCH v4 3/3] bpf: Introduce function for outputing data to perf event
2015 Aug 12
3
llvm bpf debug info. Re: [RFC PATCH v4 3/3] bpf: Introduce function for outputing data to perf event
On 2015/8/12 12:57, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 10:34:43AM +0800, Wangnan (F) via llvm-dev wrote:
>> Think about a program like this:
>>
>> struct strA { int a; }
>> struct strB { int b; }
>> int func() {
>> struct strA a;
>> struct strB b;
>>
>> a.a = 1;
>> b.b = 2;
>>