Displaying 11 results from an estimated 11 matches for "outguess".
2017 Sep 13
2
stripe size for SSDs? ( cyrus spool on btrfs?)
...lock on the flash array, no matter what the 'address' of the blocks being written is. think of it as a 'scatter-gather' operation.
>
> different drive brands and models use different strategies for this, and all this is completely opaque to the host OS so you really can't outguess or manage this process at the OS or disk controller level.
>
>
What if the collector is full?
I understand that using small chunk sizes can reduce performance because
many chunks need to be dealt with. Using large chunks would involve
reading and writing larger amounts of data every time,...
2017 Sep 09
3
cyrus spool on btrfs?
John R Pierce wrote:
>> And one may want to adjust stripe size to be resembling SSDs
>> internals, as default is for hard drives, right?
>
> as the SSD physical data blocks have no visible relation to logical block numbers or CHS, its not practical to do this. I'd use a fairly large stripe size, like 1MB, so more data can be sequentially written to the same device (even tho
2017 Sep 09
0
cyrus spool on btrfs?
...ous block on the flash array, no matter what
the 'address' of the blocks being written is.? think of it as a
'scatter-gather' operation.
different drive brands and models use different strategies for this, and
all this is completely opaque to the host OS so you really can't
outguess or manage this process at the OS or disk controller level.
--
john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz
2017 Sep 13
0
stripe size for SSDs? ( cyrus spool on btrfs?)
...what the
>> 'address' of the blocks being written is. think of it as a 'scatter-gather'
>> operation.
>>
>> different drive brands and models use different strategies for this, and
>> all this is completely opaque to the host OS so you really can't outguess or
>> manage this process at the OS or disk controller level.
>>
>>
>
> What if the collector is full?
>
> I understand that using small chunk sizes can reduce performance because
> many chunks need to be dealt with. Using large chunks would involve
> reading an...
1999 Nov 19
1
Fwd: Re: status of openssh for solaris?
...Someone has made the same quick&dirty fix as my AIX compile fix, for a lack
of /dev/urandom.
ssh expects some random bytes to be available in that file. I, or someone
else should probably create a more portable way of generating entropy. ;)
//Tor-?ke
>From: Niels Provos <provos at outguess.org>
>To: openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org
>Subject: Fwd: Re: status of openssh for solaris?
>Date: Thu, 18 Nov 1999 18:40:41 -0500 (EST)
>
>From USENET, can somebody comment?
>
>Newsgroups: comp.security.ssh
>Subject: Re: status of openssh for solaris?
>Date: 18 Nov 19...
2010 Nov 25
2
Lifting Wavelet Transform
Hi R users
Thanks in advance
Is lifting wavelet transform implemented in R? If so, which package or codes can be used for performing that?
assaedi76@yahoo.com
Thanks
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
2013 Jan 03
6
Bounty on Error Checking
Dear R developers---I just spent half a day debugging an R program,
which had two bugs---I selected the wrongly named variable, which
turns out to have been a scalar, which then happily multiplied as if
it was a matrix; and another wrongly named variable from a data frame,
that triggered no error when used as a[["name"]] or a$name . there
should be an option to turn on that throws an
2017 Sep 13
3
stripe size for SSDs? ( cyrus spool on btrfs?)
...; 'address' of the blocks being written is. think of it as a 'scatter-gather'
>>> operation.
>>>
>>> different drive brands and models use different strategies for this, and
>>> all this is completely opaque to the host OS so you really can't outguess or
>>> manage this process at the OS or disk controller level.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> What if the collector is full?
>>
>> I understand that using small chunk sizes can reduce performance because
>> many chunks need to be dealt with. Using large chun...
2008 Feb 05
2
Samba crashing word and excell?
I am having some trouble with Samba. It was working fine on an old server with 3.0.21.
Now I have updated to 3.0.28 (via 3.0.25) and a bigger fatter faster server.
There are two problems. Firstly the new server seems slower than the old one, and some users
are experiencing intermittent data loss via MS apps such as Word or Excell crashing.
The system runs on Arch Linux, with a slightly
1999 Nov 18
1
Fwd: Re: status of openssh for solaris?
>From USENET, can somebody comment?
Newsgroups: comp.security.ssh
Subject: Re: status of openssh for solaris?
Date: 18 Nov 1999 18:31:47 -0500
Message-ID: <ygaso23e5qz.fsf at severn.office.aol.com>
Reinier Post <rp at win.tue.nl> writes:
> It looks as if OpenSSH (http://www.openssh.com/) is available for
> Solaris. Can anybody comment on its maturity?
I dunno about
1999 Dec 06
0
Fwd: Re: openssh on a non-PAM system?
FYI. Maybe ppl with access to Solaris can look at this.
Niels.
From: mark at salfrd.ac.uk (Mark Powell)
Newsgroups: comp.security.ssh
Subject: Re: openssh on a non-PAM system?
Date: 6 Dec 1999 14:10:21 -0000
Message-ID: <82gg4d$15ta$1 at plato.salford.ac.uk>
In article <x7zovrqhrv.fsf at bombadil.nic.net>,
Dan Lowe <dan at bombadil.nic.net> wrote:
>mark at salfrd.ac.uk