search for: outerfac

...roduct: Portable OpenSSH Version: 8.1p1 Hardware: Other OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: Miscellaneous Assignee: unassigned-bugs at mindrot.org Reporter: sergio+it at outerface.net Please add support for Ed448 keys. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug.

https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=925961 -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: segfault in libdovecot-storage at unknown circumstances Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2019 16:34:15 +0300 From: sergio <sergio+it at outerface.net> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit at bugs.debian.org> Package: dovecot-core Version: 1:2.3.4.1-1~bpo9+1 Severity: normal Yes, I know this is not very informative. I've already set ALLOW_COREDUMPS to 1 in /etc/default/dovecot and waiting for the next fault. % grep segfa k...

On 30/09/2020 14:59, Joshua C. Colp wrote: > latest version of 16 on Ubuntu 16.12.0~dfsg-1 ? -- sergio.

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2119 Bug ID: 2119 Summary: SSHFP with DNSSEC ? no trust anchors given, validation always fails Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 6.2p1 Hardware: Other OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component:

Hello. I have two records in dialplan: exten => testA,1,Dial(PJSIP/outgoing/sip:thetestcall at sip.linphone.org) exten => testB,1,Dial(PJSIP/outgoing/sip:thetestcall at iptel.org) Calling testA works fine while testB fails with "CONGESTION". Adding debug for console shows that pjsip_resolver.c does `New queries added, performing parallel resolution again` for linphone after

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1434 Bug ID: 1434 Summary: Usability improvements, enabling creation of complex firewalls Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: nft

On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 8:47 AM sergio <sergio at outerface.net> wrote: > Hello. > > I have two records in dialplan: > > exten => testA,1,Dial(PJSIP/outgoing/sip:thetestcall at sip.linphone.org) > exten => testB,1,Dial(PJSIP/outgoing/sip:thetestcall at iptel.org) > > Calling testA works fine while testB fails with "CO...

On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 9:06 AM sergio <sergio at outerface.net> wrote: > On 30/09/2020 14:59, Joshua C. Colp wrote: > > > latest version of 16 on Ubuntu > > 16.12.0~dfsg-1 ? > I don't use packages. I built a fresh copy of 16.13.0 as it is latest and used that. -- Joshua C. Colp Asterisk Technical Lead Sangoma Technologies C...

On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 10:02 PM sergio <sergio at outerface.net> wrote: > > It was due to a lack of tcp or udp sections with transport declaration > in pjsip.conf. > > But it's still unclear, > > 1. How should I find this? Is a log so poor and needs to be reported, or > am I missing something? > At startup we actually do...

It was due to a lack of tcp or udp sections with transport declaration in pjsip.conf. But it's still unclear, 1. How should I find this? Is a log so poor and needs to be reported, or am I missing something? 2. Why I need to set bind? I use this transport only for outgoing connections. -- sergio.

Hello. Calls cancelled by caller during the dialing phase, are shown in Linphone as simply past calls, not missed ones. I thought this is an Linphone issue, but Sylvain says it's on my PBX side: https://github.com/BelledonneCommunications/linphone-android/issues/832#issuecomment-557474864 > The CANCEL message has a Reason header with Q.850 protocol and cause 0, which doesn't mean

Sometimes, linphone shows missed calls as missed. Look like asterisk replies with cause=487 that time, but I can't understand why. Grandstream always shows calls as missed ones. How should I investigate this? -- sergio.

On 16/10/2020 10:11, Michael Maier wrote: >> Sometimes, linphone shows missed calls as missed. > You could try to reproduce it I can't reproduce it, it happens less than once a month. -- sergio.

I'm subscribed, please reply to list directly. > ssl_dh is required from 2.3.0-2.3.2. From 2.3.3 onwards its optional. > You can rm the ssl-parameters.dat file to get rid of that warning. I have no ssl-parameters.dat file. -- sergio.

Hello. I've just tested my system that runs dovecot 2.3.4.1 on debian buster with testssl.sh (https://testssl.sh/) and is says: Secure Renegotiation (CVE-2009-3555) not vulnerable (OK) Secure Client-Initiated Renegotiation VULNERABLE (NOT ok), potential DoS threat Is this a configuration or a compilation issue and how to solve it? -- sergio.

Hello. I'm using dovecot in high-security mode: service_count = 1 for imap-login service starttls is requires, so the maximum number of active connections is process_limit (which is set to 1024) for the same imap-login service. But with this setup I got: doveconf: Warning: service auth { client_limit=1000 } is lower than required under max. load (1324) doveconf: Warning: service anvil {

Is it possible to create a virtual folder that selects all mails with imap Junk flag (set by pigeonhole imap4flags' setflag "Junk")? -- sergio.

Aki, sorry for poor question. >> Is it possible to create a virtual folder that selects all mails with >> imap Junk flag (set by pigeonhole imap4flags' setflag "Junk")? > Yes, see https://doc.dovecot.org/configuration_manual/virtual_plugin/ Yes, I'm talking exactly about virtual_plugin. While it's absolutely clear how to select all messages marked as

After switching on Virtual Plugin and configuring it as specified on https://doc.dovecot.org/configuration_manual/virtual_plugin/ the virtual folder is created for each user. Is it possible do not creater virtual folder automatically, only manually, for specific users? lda_mailbox_autocreate set to yes, but hope it's not related. -- sergio.

A virtual folder is just really a saved search, but index log files are created. dovecot.list.index.log for the virtual folder itself and dovecot.index.log for all subfolders. Is it correct? Is it possible to disable index logs for virtual folder or it will only make dovecot worse? -- sergio.