search for: outdo

Does Clang/Clang++ not have its own set of standard headers? Isn't this a serious issue if Clang/Clang++ is ever to outdo GCC/G++? Is there any work in progress on this? Ideally, Clang would ship as a ready-to-use installation image that included everything needed to use it as the possibly best C and C++ compiler on the market. Or, am I ahead of myself again? Cheers, Mikael -- Love Thy Frog! -------------- next p...

On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 07:42:12PM +0200, Mikael Lyngvig wrote: > Does Clang/Clang++ not have its own set of standard headers? Isn't this a > serious issue if Clang/Clang++ is ever to outdo GCC/G++? Is there any work > in progress on this? It provides the compiler-centric headers. It doesn't replace the rest of the C runtime library. That wouldn't make much sense. Joerg

I booted into X11 and have networking working and a kernel compile = running. SMP and PAE should be less than a day away. This completes = the proof of concept, I believe ;) I didn't cc LKML since I didn't want to spam them with graphics. Very = controversial graphics. Hopefully you appreciate the humor. Zach -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was

...y, but in my > > opinion, it isn't. > > Rowland, this is not about *the* way forward, this is about using the > right backend at the right time. No Ralph, it is about *the* way forward, Samba needs to get to the point that it works exactly like Windows (or better), Samba has to outdo Windows. Rowland

...idn't realize that there already is a semi-official build of CMake with Ninja support. I am trying it out right now and it seems very promising. So I'll change the document to use Ninja instead of "MinGW Makefiles". No need to waste energy on MinGW and MSYS Makefiles when Ninja outdoes them both. I thought people would have to build CMake themselves, something I'd rather avoid to keep things simple. 2012/6/17 Mikael Lyngvig <mikael at lyngvig.org> > As for Ninja, I'd like to wait until it is officially part of the released > CMake. As I understand it, Wi...

...ion, it isn't. >> >> Rowland, this is not about *the* way forward, this is about using the >> right backend at the right time. > >No Ralph, it is about *the* way forward, Samba needs to get to the >point that it works exactly like Windows (or better), Samba has to >outdo Windows. that's what I'm saying, to behave like Windows you have to stop using idmap_ad. :) -slow -- Ralph Boehme, Samba Team https://samba.org/ Samba Developer, SerNet GmbH https://sernet.de/en/samba/ GPG-Fingerprint FAE2C6088A24252051C559E4AA1E9B7126399E46

As for Ninja, I'd like to wait until it is officially part of the released CMake. As I understand it, Windows support has been checked into the CMake repository but no offical release supporting Ninja has been made yet. I just retrieved Ninja from Github and this time it built without problems. 2012/6/16 NAKAMURA Takumi <geek4civic at gmail.com> > Mikael, > > Thanks for

Using partials is a nice way to separate chunks of content into separate pages as opposed to building strings in helpers, but I''m wondering which is faster. It scares me when I see stuff like: Rendered users/_public (0.00051) Rendered users/_public (0.00009) Rendered users/_public (0.00008) Rendered users/_public (0.00008) Rendered users/_public (0.00008) ....50 more times Has anyone

On Sun, 24 Feb 2019 18:28:43 +0100 Ralph Böhme <slow at samba.org> wrote: > > Am 24.02.2019 um 16:42 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba > <samba at lists.samba.org>: > > On Sun, 24 Feb 2019 15:58:39 +0100 Ralph Böhme <slow at samba.org> > > wrote: > >> Another thing that a customer has just been bitten by, was a subtle > >> bug in

Mikael, Thanks for working on. My gross comments... - Canonical URL of LLVM project is; http://llvm.org/ , not www.llvm.org. - "test-suite and cygwin" could be split out. It would be special thing. - Memory/storage requirements would be moved to "A.B Debugging". Less memory would be enough without debug build. - Python (x64 binary) is available, too. I am using. Python