Displaying 15 results from an estimated 15 matches for "out_schedul".
Did you mean:
out_schedule
2019 May 08
3
[PATCH 06/10] s390/cio: add basic protected virtualization support
...t; + cdev->private = kzalloc(sizeof(struct ccw_device_private),
> + GFP_KERNEL | GFP_DMA);
Do we still need GFP_DMA here (since we now have cdev->private->dma_area)?
> @@ -1062,6 +1082,14 @@ static int io_subchannel_probe(struct subchannel *sch)
> if (!io_priv)
> goto out_schedule;
>
> + io_priv->dma_area = dma_alloc_coherent(&sch->dev,
> + sizeof(*io_priv->dma_area),
> + &io_priv->dma_area_dma, GFP_KERNEL);
This needs GFP_DMA.
You use a genpool for ccw_private->dma and not for iopriv->dma - looks
kinda inconsistent.
2019 May 08
3
[PATCH 06/10] s390/cio: add basic protected virtualization support
...t; + cdev->private = kzalloc(sizeof(struct ccw_device_private),
> + GFP_KERNEL | GFP_DMA);
Do we still need GFP_DMA here (since we now have cdev->private->dma_area)?
> @@ -1062,6 +1082,14 @@ static int io_subchannel_probe(struct subchannel *sch)
> if (!io_priv)
> goto out_schedule;
>
> + io_priv->dma_area = dma_alloc_coherent(&sch->dev,
> + sizeof(*io_priv->dma_area),
> + &io_priv->dma_area_dma, GFP_KERNEL);
This needs GFP_DMA.
You use a genpool for ccw_private->dma and not for iopriv->dma - looks
kinda inconsistent.
2019 May 08
0
[PATCH 06/10] s390/cio: add basic protected virtualization support
...->private->dma_area)?
>
We probably do not. I kept it GFP_DMA to keep changes to the
minimum. Should changing this in your opinion be a part of this patch?
> > @@ -1062,6 +1082,14 @@ static int io_subchannel_probe(struct subchannel *sch)
> > if (!io_priv)
> > goto out_schedule;
> >
> > + io_priv->dma_area = dma_alloc_coherent(&sch->dev,
> > + sizeof(*io_priv->dma_area),
> > + &io_priv->dma_area_dma, GFP_KERNEL);
>
> This needs GFP_DMA.
Christoph already answered this one. Thanks Christoph!
> You use a genpo...
2019 Apr 26
0
[PATCH 06/10] s390/cio: add basic protected virtualization support
...ce *cdev)
wake_up(&ccw_device_init_wq);
break;
case DEV_STATE_OFFLINE:
- /*
+ /*
* We can't register the device in interrupt context so
* we schedule a work item.
*/
@@ -1062,6 +1082,14 @@ static int io_subchannel_probe(struct subchannel *sch)
if (!io_priv)
goto out_schedule;
+ io_priv->dma_area = dma_alloc_coherent(&sch->dev,
+ sizeof(*io_priv->dma_area),
+ &io_priv->dma_area_dma, GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!io_priv->dma_area) {
+ kfree(io_priv);
+ goto out_schedule;
+ }
+
set_io_private(sch, io_priv);
css_schedule_eval(sch->schid);...
2019 May 23
0
[PATCH v2 3/8] s390/cio: add basic protected virtualization support
...ce *cdev)
wake_up(&ccw_device_init_wq);
break;
case DEV_STATE_OFFLINE:
- /*
+ /*
* We can't register the device in interrupt context so
* we schedule a work item.
*/
@@ -1062,6 +1081,14 @@ static int io_subchannel_probe(struct subchannel *sch)
if (!io_priv)
goto out_schedule;
+ io_priv->dma_area = dma_alloc_coherent(&sch->dev,
+ sizeof(*io_priv->dma_area),
+ &io_priv->dma_area_dma, GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!io_priv->dma_area) {
+ kfree(io_priv);
+ goto out_schedule;
+ }
+
set_io_private(sch, io_priv);
css_schedule_eval(sch->schid);...
2019 May 29
0
[PATCH v3 3/8] s390/cio: add basic protected virtualization support
...ce *cdev)
wake_up(&ccw_device_init_wq);
break;
case DEV_STATE_OFFLINE:
- /*
+ /*
* We can't register the device in interrupt context so
* we schedule a work item.
*/
@@ -1062,6 +1084,14 @@ static int io_subchannel_probe(struct subchannel *sch)
if (!io_priv)
goto out_schedule;
+ io_priv->dma_area = dma_alloc_coherent(&sch->dev,
+ sizeof(*io_priv->dma_area),
+ &io_priv->dma_area_dma, GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!io_priv->dma_area) {
+ kfree(io_priv);
+ goto out_schedule;
+ }
+
set_io_private(sch, io_priv);
css_schedule_eval(sch->schid);...
2019 Jun 12
0
[PATCH v5 3/8] s390/cio: add basic protected virtualization support
...ce *cdev)
wake_up(&ccw_device_init_wq);
break;
case DEV_STATE_OFFLINE:
- /*
+ /*
* We can't register the device in interrupt context so
* we schedule a work item.
*/
@@ -1062,6 +1084,14 @@ static int io_subchannel_probe(struct subchannel *sch)
if (!io_priv)
goto out_schedule;
+ io_priv->dma_area = dma_alloc_coherent(&sch->dev,
+ sizeof(*io_priv->dma_area),
+ &io_priv->dma_area_dma, GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!io_priv->dma_area) {
+ kfree(io_priv);
+ goto out_schedule;
+ }
+
set_io_private(sch, io_priv);
css_schedule_eval(sch->schid);...
2019 Apr 26
33
[PATCH 00/10] s390: virtio: support protected virtualization
Enhanced virtualization protection technology may require the use of
bounce buffers for I/O. While support for this was built into the virtio
core, virtio-ccw wasn't changed accordingly.
Some background on technology (not part of this series) and the
terminology used.
* Protected Virtualization (PV):
Protected Virtualization guarantees, that non-shared memory of a guest
that operates in PV
2019 Apr 26
33
[PATCH 00/10] s390: virtio: support protected virtualization
Enhanced virtualization protection technology may require the use of
bounce buffers for I/O. While support for this was built into the virtio
core, virtio-ccw wasn't changed accordingly.
Some background on technology (not part of this series) and the
terminology used.
* Protected Virtualization (PV):
Protected Virtualization guarantees, that non-shared memory of a guest
that operates in PV
2019 Jun 12
21
[PATCH v5 0/8] s390: virtio: support protected virtualization
Enhanced virtualization protection technology may require the use of
bounce buffers for I/O. While support for this was built into the virtio
core, virtio-ccw wasn't changed accordingly.
Some background on technology (not part of this series) and the
terminology used.
* Protected Virtualization (PV):
Protected Virtualization guarantees, that non-shared memory of a guest
that operates in PV
2019 Jun 12
21
[PATCH v5 0/8] s390: virtio: support protected virtualization
Enhanced virtualization protection technology may require the use of
bounce buffers for I/O. While support for this was built into the virtio
core, virtio-ccw wasn't changed accordingly.
Some background on technology (not part of this series) and the
terminology used.
* Protected Virtualization (PV):
Protected Virtualization guarantees, that non-shared memory of a guest
that operates in PV
2019 Jun 06
15
[PATCH v4 0/8] s390: virtio: support protected virtualization
Enhanced virtualization protection technology may require the use of
bounce buffers for I/O. While support for this was built into the virtio
core, virtio-ccw wasn't changed accordingly.
Some background on technology (not part of this series) and the
terminology used.
* Protected Virtualization (PV):
Protected Virtualization guarantees, that non-shared memory of a guest
that operates in PV
2019 Jun 06
15
[PATCH v4 0/8] s390: virtio: support protected virtualization
Enhanced virtualization protection technology may require the use of
bounce buffers for I/O. While support for this was built into the virtio
core, virtio-ccw wasn't changed accordingly.
Some background on technology (not part of this series) and the
terminology used.
* Protected Virtualization (PV):
Protected Virtualization guarantees, that non-shared memory of a guest
that operates in PV
2019 May 29
16
[PATCH v3 0/8] s390: virtio: support protected virtualization
Enhanced virtualization protection technology may require the use of
bounce buffers for I/O. While support for this was built into the virtio
core, virtio-ccw wasn't changed accordingly.
Some background on technology (not part of this series) and the
terminology used.
* Protected Virtualization (PV):
Protected Virtualization guarantees, that non-shared memory of a guest
that operates in PV
2019 May 23
18
[PATCH v2 0/8] s390: virtio: support protected virtualization
Enhanced virtualization protection technology may require the use of
bounce buffers for I/O. While support for this was built into the virtio
core, virtio-ccw wasn't changed accordingly.
Some background on technology (not part of this series) and the
terminology used.
* Protected Virtualization (PV):
Protected Virtualization guarantees, that non-shared memory of a guest
that operates in PV