search for: out_oom

...context */ + ClearPagePDE(virt_to_page(pgd)); spin_lock_irqsave(&pgd_lock, flags); pgd_list_del(pgd); spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pgd_lock, flags); @@ -244,13 +246,16 @@ pgd_t *pgd_alloc(struct mm_struct *mm) pmd_t *pmd = kmem_cache_alloc(pmd_cache, GFP_KERNEL); if (!pmd) goto out_oom; + SetPagePDE(virt_to_page(pmd)); set_pgd(&pgd[i], __pgd(1 + __pa(pmd))); } return pgd; out_oom: - for (i--; i >= 0; i--) + for (i--; i >= 0; i--) { + ClearPagePDE(pfn_to_page(pgd_val(pgd[i]) >> PAGE_SHIFT)); kmem_cache_free(pmd_cache, (void *)__va(pgd_val(pgd[i])-1))...

...context */ + ClearPagePDE(virt_to_page(pgd)); spin_lock_irqsave(&pgd_lock, flags); pgd_list_del(pgd); spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pgd_lock, flags); @@ -244,13 +246,16 @@ pgd_t *pgd_alloc(struct mm_struct *mm) pmd_t *pmd = kmem_cache_alloc(pmd_cache, GFP_KERNEL); if (!pmd) goto out_oom; + SetPagePDE(virt_to_page(pmd)); set_pgd(&pgd[i], __pgd(1 + __pa(pmd))); } return pgd; out_oom: - for (i--; i >= 0; i--) + for (i--; i >= 0; i--) { + ClearPagePDE(pfn_to_page(pgd_val(pgd[i]) >> PAGE_SHIFT)); kmem_cache_free(pmd_cache, (void *)__va(pgd_val(pgd[i])-1))...

...=========================================================== --- linux-2.6.13.orig/arch/i386/mm/pgtable.c 2005-08-31 14:48:17.000000000 -0700 +++ linux-2.6.13/arch/i386/mm/pgtable.c 2005-08-31 14:48:53.000000000 -0700 @@ -247,14 +247,14 @@ pgd_t *pgd_alloc(struct mm_struct *mm) if (!pmd) goto out_oom; SetPagePDE(virt_to_page(pmd)); - set_pgd(&pgd[i], __pgd(1 + __pa(pmd))); + set_pgd(&pgd[i], __pgd(_PAGE_PRESENT | __pa(pmd))); } return pgd; out_oom: for (i--; i >= 0; i--) { ClearPagePDE(pfn_to_page(pgd_val(pgd[i]) >> PAGE_SHIFT)); - kmem_cache_free(pmd_cache, (...

...=========================================================== --- linux-2.6.13.orig/arch/i386/mm/pgtable.c 2005-08-31 14:48:17.000000000 -0700 +++ linux-2.6.13/arch/i386/mm/pgtable.c 2005-08-31 14:48:53.000000000 -0700 @@ -247,14 +247,14 @@ pgd_t *pgd_alloc(struct mm_struct *mm) if (!pmd) goto out_oom; SetPagePDE(virt_to_page(pmd)); - set_pgd(&pgd[i], __pgd(1 + __pa(pmd))); + set_pgd(&pgd[i], __pgd(_PAGE_PRESENT | __pa(pmd))); } return pgd; out_oom: for (i--; i >= 0; i--) { ClearPagePDE(pfn_to_page(pgd_val(pgd[i]) >> PAGE_SHIFT)); - kmem_cache_free(pmd_cache, (...

...virt_release_pd(__pa(pgd) >> PAGE_SHIFT); spin_lock_irqsave(&pgd_lock, flags); pgd_list_del(pgd); spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pgd_lock, flags); @@ -274,13 +281,18 @@ pgd_t *pgd_alloc(struct mm_struct *mm) pmd_t *pmd = kmem_cache_alloc(pmd_cache, GFP_KERNEL); if (!pmd) goto out_oom; + paravirt_alloc_pd(__pa(pmd) >> PAGE_SHIFT); set_pgd(&pgd[i], __pgd(1 + __pa(pmd))); } return pgd; out_oom: - for (i--; i >= 0; i--) - kmem_cache_free(pmd_cache, (void *)__va(pgd_val(pgd[i])-1)); + for (i--; i >= 0; i--) { + pgd_t pgdent = pgd[i]; + void* pmd = (void...

...virt_release_pd(__pa(pgd) >> PAGE_SHIFT); spin_lock_irqsave(&pgd_lock, flags); pgd_list_del(pgd); spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pgd_lock, flags); @@ -274,13 +281,18 @@ pgd_t *pgd_alloc(struct mm_struct *mm) pmd_t *pmd = kmem_cache_alloc(pmd_cache, GFP_KERNEL); if (!pmd) goto out_oom; + paravirt_alloc_pd(__pa(pmd) >> PAGE_SHIFT); set_pgd(&pgd[i], __pgd(1 + __pa(pmd))); } return pgd; out_oom: - for (i--; i >= 0; i--) - kmem_cache_free(pmd_cache, (void *)__va(pgd_val(pgd[i])-1)); + for (i--; i >= 0; i--) { + pgd_t pgdent = pgd[i]; + void* pmd = (void...

...virt_release_pd(__pa(pgd) >> PAGE_SHIFT); spin_lock_irqsave(&pgd_lock, flags); pgd_list_del(pgd); spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pgd_lock, flags); @@ -274,13 +281,18 @@ pgd_t *pgd_alloc(struct mm_struct *mm) pmd_t *pmd = kmem_cache_alloc(pmd_cache, GFP_KERNEL); if (!pmd) goto out_oom; + paravirt_alloc_pd(__pa(pmd) >> PAGE_SHIFT); set_pgd(&pgd[i], __pgd(1 + __pa(pmd))); } return pgd; out_oom: - for (i--; i >= 0; i--) - kmem_cache_free(pmd_cache, (void *)__va(pgd_val(pgd[i])-1)); + for (i--; i >= 0; i--) { + pgd_t pgdent = pgd[i]; + void* pmd = (void...

...virt_release_pd(__pa(pgd) >> PAGE_SHIFT); spin_lock_irqsave(&pgd_lock, flags); pgd_list_del(pgd); spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pgd_lock, flags); @@ -274,13 +281,18 @@ pgd_t *pgd_alloc(struct mm_struct *mm) pmd_t *pmd = kmem_cache_alloc(pmd_cache, GFP_KERNEL); if (!pmd) goto out_oom; + paravirt_alloc_pd(__pa(pmd) >> PAGE_SHIFT); set_pgd(&pgd[i], __pgd(1 + __pa(pmd))); } return pgd; out_oom: - for (i--; i >= 0; i--) - kmem_cache_free(pmd_cache, (void *)__va(pgd_val(pgd[i])-1)); + for (i--; i >= 0; i--) { + pgd_t pgdent = pgd[i]; + void* pmd = (void...

Is there any real use in having a ctor/dtor for the pgd cache? Given that all pgd allocation happens via pgd_alloc/pgd_free, why not just fold the [cd]tor in? I'm asking because Xen wants pgd[3] to be unshared in the PAE case, and it looks to me like the easiest way to handle that is by making pgd_alloc/free pv-ops and doing the appropriate thing in the Xen code. Would need to sort out the

Is there any real use in having a ctor/dtor for the pgd cache? Given that all pgd allocation happens via pgd_alloc/pgd_free, why not just fold the [cd]tor in? I'm asking because Xen wants pgd[3] to be unshared in the PAE case, and it looks to me like the easiest way to handle that is by making pgd_alloc/free pv-ops and doing the appropriate thing in the Xen code. Would need to sort out the

...HIFT, + __pa(swapper_pg_dir) >> PAGE_SHIFT, + USER_PTRS_PER_PGD, + PTRS_PER_PGD - USER_PTRS_PER_PGD); for (i = 0; i < USER_PTRS_PER_PGD; ++i) { pmd_t *pmd = kmem_cache_alloc(pmd_cache, GFP_KERNEL); if (!pmd) goto out_oom; + mach_setup_pmd(__pa(pmd) >> PAGE_SHIFT); set_pgd(&pgd[i], __pgd(1 + __pa(pmd))); } return pgd; out_oom: - for (i--; i >= 0; i--) + for (i--; i >= 0; i--) { + mach_release_pmd(pgd_val(pgd[i]) >> PAGE_SHIFT); kmem_cache_free(pmd_cache, (void *)__va(pgd_val(pgd[...

...HIFT, + __pa(swapper_pg_dir) >> PAGE_SHIFT, + USER_PTRS_PER_PGD, + PTRS_PER_PGD - USER_PTRS_PER_PGD); for (i = 0; i < USER_PTRS_PER_PGD; ++i) { pmd_t *pmd = kmem_cache_alloc(pmd_cache, GFP_KERNEL); if (!pmd) goto out_oom; + mach_setup_pmd(__pa(pmd) >> PAGE_SHIFT); set_pgd(&pgd[i], __pgd(1 + __pa(pmd))); } return pgd; out_oom: - for (i--; i >= 0; i--) + for (i--; i >= 0; i--) { + mach_release_pmd(pgd_val(pgd[i]) >> PAGE_SHIFT); kmem_cache_free(pmd_cache, (void *)__va(pgd_val(pgd[...

[ REPOST: Apologies to anyone who has seen this before. It didn't make it onto any of the lists it should have. -J ] Hi Andrew, This series of patches lays the basic ground work for the paravirtualized kernel patches coming later on. I think this lot is ready for the rough-and-tumble world of the -mm tree. For the most part, these patches do nothing or very little. The patches should

[ REPOST: Apologies to anyone who has seen this before. It didn't make it onto any of the lists it should have. -J ] Hi Andrew, This series of patches lays the basic ground work for the paravirtualized kernel patches coming later on. I think this lot is ready for the rough-and-tumble world of the -mm tree. For the most part, these patches do nothing or very little. The patches should

Hi Andi, This series of patches updates paravirt_ops in various ways. Some of the changes are plain cleanups and improvements, and some add some interfaces necessary for Xen. The brief overview: add-MAINTAINERS.patch - obvious remove-CONFIG_DEBUG_PARAVIRT.patch - no longer needed paravirt-nop.patch - mark nop operations consistently paravirt-pte-accessors.patch - operations to pack/unpack

Hi Andi, This series of patches updates paravirt_ops in various ways. Some of the changes are plain cleanups and improvements, and some add some interfaces necessary for Xen. The brief overview: add-MAINTAINERS.patch - obvious remove-CONFIG_DEBUG_PARAVIRT.patch - no longer needed paravirt-nop.patch - mark nop operations consistently paravirt-pte-accessors.patch - operations to pack/unpack

Hi Andi, Here's a repost of the paravirt_ops update series I posted the other day. Since then, I found a few potential bugs with patching clobbering, cleaned up and documented paravirt.h and the patching machinery. Overview: add-MAINTAINERS.patch obvious remove-CONFIG_DEBUG_PARAVIRT.patch No longer meaningful or needed. paravirt-nop.patch Clean up nop paravirt_ops functions, mainly to

Hi Andi, Here's a repost of the paravirt_ops update series I posted the other day. Since then, I found a few potential bugs with patching clobbering, cleaned up and documented paravirt.h and the patching machinery. Overview: add-MAINTAINERS.patch obvious remove-CONFIG_DEBUG_PARAVIRT.patch No longer meaningful or needed. paravirt-nop.patch Clean up nop paravirt_ops functions, mainly to

I''m sure everyone has seen the drop of VMI patches for Linux at this point, but just in case, the link is included below. I''ve read this version of the VMI spec and have made my way through most of the patches. While I wasn''t really that impressed with the first spec wrt Xen, the second version seems to be much more palatable. Specifically, the code inlining and

This patch series implements the Linux Xen guest in terms of the paravirt-ops interface. The features in implemented this patch series are: * domU only * UP only (most code is SMP-safe, but there's no way to create a new vcpu) * writable pagetables, with late pinning/early unpinning (no shadow pagetable support) * supports both PAE and non-PAE modes * xen console * virtual block