search for: out_io_unlock

...ruct vm_fault *vmf, if (unlikely(ret != 0)) return ret; - err = ttm_mem_io_lock(man, true); + err = ttm_mem_io_reserve(bdev, &bo->mem); if (unlikely(err != 0)) - return VM_FAULT_NOPAGE; - err = ttm_mem_io_reserve_vm(bo); - if (unlikely(err != 0)) { - ret = VM_FAULT_SIGBUS; - goto out_io_unlock; - } + return VM_FAULT_SIGBUS; page_offset = ((address - vma->vm_start) >> PAGE_SHIFT) + vma->vm_pgoff - drm_vma_node_start(&bo->base.vma_node); page_last = vma_pages(vma) + vma->vm_pgoff - drm_vma_node_start(&bo->base.vma_node); - if (unlikely(page_offse...

Just a gentle ping on this. Already got the Acked-by from Daniel, but I need some of the nouveau guys to test this since I can only compile test it. Regards, Christian.

We are trying to remove the io_lru handling and depend on zero init base, offset and addr here. v2: init addr as well Signed-off-by: Christian K?nig <christian.koenig at amd.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c | 9 +++++++++ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c index e3931e515906..772c640a6046 100644 ---

Hi guys, so I got some hardware and tested this and after hammering out tons of typos it now seems to work fine. Could you give it more testing? Thanks in advance, Christian

While working on TTM cleanups I've found that the io_reserve_lru used by Nouveau is actually not working at all. In general we should remove driver specific handling from the memory management, so this patch moves the io_reserve_lru handling into Nouveau instead. The patch should be functional correct, but is only compile tested! Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig at

Hi guys, I've already send this out in September last year, but only got a response from Daniel. Could you guys please test this and tell me what you think about it? Basically I'm trying to remove all driver specific features from TTM which don't need to be inside the framework. Thanks, Christian.