search for: out_count

...console.c index 775c898..ccb5357 100644 --- a/drivers/char/virtio_console.c +++ b/drivers/char/virtio_console.c @@ -669,8 +669,8 @@ done: * Give out the data that's requested from the buffer that we have * queued up. */ -static ssize_t fill_readbuf(struct port *port, char *out_buf, size_t out_count, - bool to_user) +static ssize_t fill_readbuf(struct port *port, char __user *out_buf, + size_t out_count, bool to_user) { struct port_buffer *buf; unsigned long flags; @@ -688,7 +688,8 @@ static ssize_t fill_readbuf(struct port *port, char *out_buf, size_t out_count, if (ret)...

...console.c index 775c898..ccb5357 100644 --- a/drivers/char/virtio_console.c +++ b/drivers/char/virtio_console.c @@ -669,8 +669,8 @@ done: * Give out the data that's requested from the buffer that we have * queued up. */ -static ssize_t fill_readbuf(struct port *port, char *out_buf, size_t out_count, - bool to_user) +static ssize_t fill_readbuf(struct port *port, char __user *out_buf, + size_t out_count, bool to_user) { struct port_buffer *buf; unsigned long flags; @@ -688,7 +688,8 @@ static ssize_t fill_readbuf(struct port *port, char *out_buf, size_t out_count, if (ret)...

...!out_vq->vq_ops->get_buf(out_vq, &len)) cpu_relax(); - - buf->len = tmplen; fail: /* We're expected to return the amount of data we wrote */ - return buf->len; + return len; } /* @@ -461,26 +436,25 @@ static ssize_t fill_readbuf(struct port *port, char *out_buf, size_t out_count, bool to_user) { struct port_buffer *buf; - ssize_t ret; unsigned long flags; if (!out_count || !port_has_data(port)) return 0; buf = port->inbuf; - if (out_count > buf->len - buf->offset) - out_count = buf->len - buf->offset; + out_count = min(out_count,...

...!out_vq->vq_ops->get_buf(out_vq, &len)) cpu_relax(); - - buf->len = tmplen; fail: /* We're expected to return the amount of data we wrote */ - return buf->len; + return len; } /* @@ -461,26 +436,25 @@ static ssize_t fill_readbuf(struct port *port, char *out_buf, size_t out_count, bool to_user) { struct port_buffer *buf; - ssize_t ret; unsigned long flags; if (!out_count || !port_has_data(port)) return 0; buf = port->inbuf; - if (out_count > buf->len - buf->offset) - out_count = buf->len - buf->offset; + out_count = min(out_count,...

...src at entry=0) at ../../../../hw/xfree86/dri2/dri2.c:912 #9 0x000055920b6e0ba0 in do_get_buffers (pDraw=<optimized out>, width=width at entry=0x7ffdc7dee648, height=height at entry=0x7ffdc7dee650, attachments=<optimized out>, attachments at entry=0x55920c23f1dc, count=2, out_count=out_count at entry=0x7ffdc7dee658, has_format=1) at ../../../../hw/xfree86/dri2/dri2.c:631 #10 0x000055920b6e0d7b in DRI2GetBuffersWithFormat (pDraw=<optimized out>, width=width at entry=0x7ffdc7dee648, height=height at entry=0x7ffdc7dee650, attachments=attachments at entry=0x5...

(Rusty, would it improve the chances of getting this patch in your tree if this description were written with latex instead of without it?) Here is a new iteration of the patch series that implements a transport for guest and host communications. I've tested for compatibility (old qemu & new kernel, new qemu & old kernel, new qemu & new kernel) and it all works fine. To maintain

(Rusty, would it improve the chances of getting this patch in your tree if this description were written with latex instead of without it?) Here is a new iteration of the patch series that implements a transport for guest and host communications. I've tested for compatibility (old qemu & new kernel, new qemu & old kernel, new qemu & new kernel) and it all works fine. To maintain

Hello all, Here is a new iteration of the patch series that implements a transport for guest and host communications. I've tested for compatibility (old qemu & new kernel, new qemu & old kernel, new qemu & new kernel) and it all works fine. To maintain backward compatibility, the first port to be spawned (port at id 0) is to be a console port, to be bound to hvc. This keeps new

Hello all, Here is a new iteration of the patch series that implements a transport for guest and host communications. I've tested for compatibility (old qemu & new kernel, new qemu & old kernel, new qemu & new kernel) and it all works fine. To maintain backward compatibility, the first port to be spawned (port at id 0) is to be a console port, to be bound to hvc. This keeps new

This adds ioctl BTRFS_IOC_GET_FSIDS which reads the fs info through the btrfs-control Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> --- fs/btrfs/super.c | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----- fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ fs/btrfs/volumes.h | 2 + include/uapi/linux/btrfs.h | 19 +++++++++++++++++ 4 files changed,

Hello, This is the patch that I have for adding support for multiple ports to virtio_console. It's pretty stable in my testing so far and the memory corruption that I had earlier has been resolved in linux-next so I'm proposing this for inclusion. This currently uses device major number 60 from the experimental range; Alan could you please reserve a new major number for virtio_console?

Hello, This is the patch that I have for adding support for multiple ports to virtio_console. It's pretty stable in my testing so far and the memory corruption that I had earlier has been resolved in linux-next so I'm proposing this for inclusion. This currently uses device major number 60 from the experimental range; Alan could you please reserve a new major number for virtio_console?

...) +static inline bool is_internal(u32 flags) +{ + return flags & VIRTIO_CONSOLE_ID_INTERNAL; +} + +/* + * Give out the data that's requested from the buffers that we have + * queued up per port + */ +static ssize_t fill_readbuf(struct virtio_console_port *port, + char *out_buf, size_t out_count, bool to_user) +{ + struct virtio_console_port_buffer *buf, *buf2; + ssize_t out_offset, ret; + + out_offset = 0; + list_for_each_entry_safe(buf, buf2, &port->readbuf_head, next) { + size_t copy_size; + + copy_size = out_count; + if (copy_size > buf->len - buf->offset) + copy_s...

...) +static inline bool is_internal(u32 flags) +{ + return flags & VIRTIO_CONSOLE_ID_INTERNAL; +} + +/* + * Give out the data that's requested from the buffers that we have + * queued up per port + */ +static ssize_t fill_readbuf(struct virtio_console_port *port, + char *out_buf, size_t out_count, bool to_user) +{ + struct virtio_console_port_buffer *buf, *buf2; + ssize_t out_offset, ret; + + out_offset = 0; + list_for_each_entry_safe(buf, buf2, &port->readbuf_head, next) { + size_t copy_size; + + copy_size = out_count; + if (copy_size > buf->len - buf->offset) + copy_s...

Hello all, Here is a new iteration of the patch series that implements a transport for guest and host communications. I've tested for compatibility (old qemu & new kernel, new qemu & old kernel, new qemu & new kernel) and it all works fine*. There are a few items on my todo list but this works well. New since last send: - live migration support** - write path in the guest

Hello all, Here is a new iteration of the patch series that implements a transport for guest and host communications. I've tested for compatibility (old qemu & new kernel, new qemu & old kernel, new qemu & new kernel) and it all works fine*. There are a few items on my todo list but this works well. New since last send: - live migration support** - write path in the guest

Hello all, Here is a new iteration of the patch series that implements a transport for guest and host communications. I've tested for compatibility (old qemu & new kernel, new qemu & old kernel, new qemu & new kernel) and it all works fine. To maintain backward compatibility, the first port to be spawned (port at id 0) is to be a console port, to be bound to hvc. This keeps new

Hello all, Here is a new iteration of the patch series that implements a transport for guest and host communications. I've tested for compatibility (old qemu & new kernel, new qemu & old kernel, new qemu & new kernel) and it all works fine. To maintain backward compatibility, the first port to be spawned (port at id 0) is to be a console port, to be bound to hvc. This keeps new

Hi Rusty, The main thing in these patches is the introduction of injecting SIGIO on host-side connect/disconnect events and when new data is available for ports. The first two patches fix bugs that I haven't seen, but look like the right thing to do. These have been tested extensively using the test-virtserial test suite. Please apply, Amit. Amit Shah (4): virtio: console: Un-block

Hi Rusty, The main thing in these patches is the introduction of injecting SIGIO on host-side connect/disconnect events and when new data is available for ports. The first two patches fix bugs that I haven't seen, but look like the right thing to do. These have been tested extensively using the test-virtserial test suite. Please apply, Amit. Amit Shah (4): virtio: console: Un-block