Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "ourt".
Did you mean:
our
2008 Jun 16
1
[LLVMdev] [llvm-announce] llvm and simplescalar
It use to. alphasim (the validated alpha model based on simplescalar)
is better though. Also, since no one has needed to run simplescalar
experiments, the alpha backend has bitrotted some. The last version
that I know worked with most of spec was llvm 1.8 or so. You need to
get or write an elf64 loader and fix a couple instruction
implementations in simplescalar to get it to run linux binaries
2008 Jun 16
0
[LLVMdev] [llvm-announce] llvm and simplescalar
...t I know worked with most of spec was llvm 1.8 or so. You need to
> get or write an elf64 loader and fix a couple instruction
> implementations in simplescalar to get it to run linux binaries (I
> have both somewhere).
IMNSHO, don't use SimpleScalar. It's simulation model is WAY ourt of date.
Use M5 instead:
http://m5.eecs.umich.edu/wiki/index.php/Main_Page
-Dave
2008 Jun 16
6
llvm and simplescalar
hello everyone,
I'm wondering whether llvm can work together with simplescalar. Would anyone
please give me some clarification? Thanks a lot!
2008 Jun 16
6
llvm and simplescalar
hello everyone,
I'm wondering whether llvm can work together with simplescalar. Would anyone
please give me some clarification? Thanks a lot!
2008 Jun 17
0
[LLVMdev] [llvm-announce] llvm and simplescalar
...t I know worked with most of spec was llvm 1.8 or so. You need to
> get or write an elf64 loader and fix a couple instruction
> implementations in simplescalar to get it to run linux binaries (I
> have both somewhere).
IMNSHO, don't use SimpleScalar. It's simulation model is WAY ourt of date.
Use M5 instead:
http://m5.eecs.umich.edu/wiki/index.php/Main_Page
-Dave
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20080617/b05685bc/attachment...