Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "ourselves".
2003 Aug 05
1
RE: [R] ^ operation much slower in R 1.7.1 than in R 1.7 .0 ???
I have both the CRAN binary and my own compiled version of R v1.7.1 on the
same machine (Dell Pentium III 800 MHz running NT 4)
Using the example provided earlier:
> phi <- 1.6180339887498949
> a <- floor(runif(750000)*1000)
> system.time(b <- (phi^a - (-phi)^(-a))/sqrt(5))[3]
I get 10.99 secs on the CRAN binary and 2.09 secs on my own compiled
version.
I hope this helps
2003 Aug 05
0
RE: [R] ^ operation much slower in R 1.7.1 than in R 1.7 .0 ???
I used the packaged "MinGW-2.0.0-3.exe" exactly as specified on
http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/pub/Rtools/ - in fact I used these recommendations
throughout.
According to the release notes MinGW version 2.0.0 contains the following
list of packages:
GCC-3.2-core-20020817-1
binutils-2.13-20020903-1
mingw-runtime-2.2
w32api-2.0
gdb-5.1.1-1
make-3.79.1-20010722 (binary renamed as mingw32-make)
2006 Apr 28
1
mISDN: No DID/extension information returns busy to caller
I'm running a setup with chan_misdn on a austrian PTP-line. When
somebody dials in without an extension, he gets a busy signal.
I don't see the call at all in asterisk.
I *have* set immediate=yes in misdn.conf. And I *do* have an s-extension
in my dialplan for the context used by misdn. Calls that provide an
extension work fine.
Attached is my misdn.conf and a verbose 3, misdn set debug
2008 Mar 05
21
wxruby, XRC, DialogBlock
I''ve been trying to figure out the best method for generating GUI''s with
Ruby. I ended up using DialogBlock because it seems like the fastest
way. But not I have to work backwards and have not done this before.
How do I go from the file I generate in DialogBlock to a code in Ruby?
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.