search for: ould

...hones supported XML pushed information to which they replied that only model 600 had a microbrwoser capable of reading dhtml files and such. My question to the community is: is somebody doing any XML info push to any brand of phones except Cisco? How are you doing it? One of the wonders of VoIP should be the means to send information back to the phone which ould be displayed on those wonderful screens that they have :) besides showing callerid and time which normal phones do.. Any ideas/comments? Anton Krall

...the fuction read.table to avoid reading commented lines in data files. I want to use this function to read a table in a data file like this #------------------------------- x y z #my data begin here 1 2 3 12 3 4 1 0 1 # no comment !!! 2 3 5 #-------------------------------- Thanks in advance. -- Ould MOHAMED ABDALLAHI Mohamed Lemine || e-mail: mould at imag.fr Laboratoire de Modelisation et Calcul || Tel: +33 4 76 51 45 54 BP 53, 38041 Grenoble cedex 9 (France) || Fax: +33 4 76 63 12 63 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-...

I'm installing Xvid 1.0.2 in wine and this is the error I receive. This aborts the installation. What could be causing this? I don't see a log file in /var for wine or else Iw ould post it, If there is any file that I should post to help diagnose this please let me know! Thanks!

der output (4 bits in the first byte) ???=0A=A0=0ASo here is a scenario I w= ould like some feedback on:=0A=A0=0AClient A makes a narrowband Speex VOIP = call to Client B.=0A=A0=0AIn the SIP negotiation there is no information ex= changed besides the fact that it is a narrowband speex call (speex/8000)=0A= =A0=0AClient A operates at a bitrate of 11kbit/s (28 bytes per payload)=0...

...ping to stir the Rails pot a little bit here, so please go easy with me ;-) Regular Expressions is the most densely inhumane language construct ever invented in any ''civilisation'', and the fact that we still have to dirty our minds with this in Rails is something that (sh/c)ould ideally be corrected in Rails (preferably before the release of 1.2 (?)) or in the form of a plugin. A very common scenario in Rails models are: validates_format_of :name, :with => [ only characters that are commonly found in Names, ie: NOT {^%$([]\/><?;* ) ] validates_f...

We received no replies to this email that we sent a few days ago. We're not sure why. If we miss something that is obvious to everybody, kindly point it out. We ?ould like to get iteration working, to be able to mass-delete specific emails from all mailboxes, in case of for example received virusses... Here is my question again: Hi, User iteration doesn't work, we're getting: > auth: Error: Trying to iterate users, but userdbs don't support i...

...I, for example, define a >> few functions, start scattering code into them, decide I' like to >> declare >> some more local variables in one of them, generate code for another, >> return to the first one and stick in a new basic block at its start, >> discover I should have declared some more global variables, and so >> forth? >> >> That could be very convenient. > > > Yes, you can absolutely do this. > > — Gordon I think I may have found an exception to this -- the API seems to require me to have all the fields for a struct...

On 07.07.2017 10:33, mj wrote: > We received no replies to this email that we sent a few days ago. > We're not sure why. If we miss something that is obvious to everybody, > kindly point it out. > We ?ould like to get iteration working, to be able to mass-delete > specific emails from all mailboxes, in case of for example received > virusses... > > Here is my question again: > > Hi, > > User iteration doesn't work, we're getting: >> auth: Error: Trying to iterate...

...ruggling in using python bindings for smbtorture test suits. In case I want to run smbtorture python bindings from a client m/c to a Samba standalone server (or Samba as member to an AD domain), what are the steps to follow, as I don't see any clear documentation on the same. Below are what I could do so far: samba-4.4.4/selftest/wscript: Main code for selftest samba-4.4.4/selftest/target/--.pm : Files for testenv creation samba-4.4.4/selftest/st: Test environment gets created under this dir Steps followed to execute tests: 1../configure --enable-selftest --testenv 2.make -j testenv S...

...d not encrypted. Or, not constantly changing > (with their encryption). Not so. For small file there is no advantage as any change may change the whole file. Its for large files where only a few blocks change that the delta algorithms saves transfer time. And that's exactly where eCryptfs ould help. You don't like file level encryption but that is exactly what you have been asking about. You cant move out of Windows but still want a scalable, stable solution. Its all a contradiction of terms.. Selva -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: &lt...

On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 12:54 PM, Xen <list at xenhideout.nl> wrote: > Hi Folks, > > I was wondering if I could ask this question here. > > Initially when I was thinking up how to do this I was expecting block > encryption to stay consistent from one 'encryption run' to the next, but I > found out later that most schemes randomize the result by injecting a > random block or seed at the...

I have a set-up of 3 servers at disparate geographical locations. Server 1 provides web services, and users should be able to use sftp only. Admins should be able to get shells. Server 2 provides CVS services, and users sh ould be able to use cvs only. Admins should be able to get shells. Server 3 provides shell services for all users. There appears to be no easy way of implementing this within the current Ope...

...grenlow at hk.mailbox.de On 18 May 2015, at 18:20, Jeremy Allison wrote: On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 03:31:55PM +0200, Greg Enlow wrote: > Hi, > > The Server to which the msdfs is pointing is a netapp. Though we theoretically can access the shell on it then begin to mess around there, we would really like to avoid that. Warranty and such make it a bit of a legal issue. That is the reason we went with a separate instance in the first place and now wonder why the preexec doesn't fire. > > There is nothing in tmp of the msdfs box. > > Like I asked before, is this by desig...

...ng within this email shall cons titute a soli citation or an invi tation to get p osition in or se ll an y se, curity ment ioned herein. This newsletter is neither a registered investment advisor nor affiliated with any bro ker or de, aler. All sta tements ma de are our exp ress opinion only and sh ould be trea ted as such. We may o wn, take po sition and se ll any secu rities men tioned at any time. This report inc ludes for ward look ing stat ements within the mea ning of The Pri vate Se curities Litig ation Refo rm Act of 19 95. These stat ements may incl ude t erms as e xpect, bel ieve, may, w...

Hello group, I am experimenting with parallel processing on my quad core Win 7 32 bit machine. Using these packages for the first time. I can see all my processor running at full performance when I use a smaller dataset require(snow) require(doSNOW) require(foreach) #change the 8 to however many cores\phys processors you have on your machine cl.tmp = makeCluster(rep("localhost",4),

...r time-order? Can I, for example, define a > few functions, start scattering code into them, decide I' like to > declare > some more local variables in one of them, generate code for another, > return to the first one and stick in a new basic block at its start, > discover I should have declared some more global variables, and so > forth? > > That could be very convenient. Yes, you can absolutely do this. — Gordon

...:Call kernel32.CloseHandle(0000008c) ret=00408219 0009:Call ntdll.NtClose(0000008c) ret=77b98909 0009:Ret ntdll.NtClose() retval=00000000 ret=77b98909 0009:Ret kernel32.CloseHandle() retval=00000001 ret=00408219 0009:Call user32.MessageBoxA(00010024,77afe854 "Setup failure: a file or files c ould not be copied.",7ec10800 "Setup Error",00000010) ret=00401090 Dunno if this will help you figure out what's wrong. (2) I tried running the program direct from a Windows installation (which I didn't expect to work right, because it dumps a lot in the registry). This dies wi...

...s (server2 == NETAPP under warranty). I had also already explained on 21 May 2015 22:41:17 CEST why option 2.) was an even _less_ viable solution due to the security permissions of the underlying NTFS system on server 2 then _not_ being user specific and therefore dangerous. I can understand and would accept that the 'msdfs proxy' mechanism might be executing at a time well ahead of the connect block in the code and therefore precluding any 'preexec' possibilities. But it is exact that question that hasn't been answered - is this by design or a mistake? If it by design, the...

...to be in any particular time-order? Can I, for example, define a few functions, start scattering code into them, decide I' like to declare some more local variables in one of them, generate code for another, return to the first one and stick in a new basic block at its start, discover I should have declared some more global variables, and so forth? That could be very convenient. -- hendrik

...nd. > > >> That is it. > > >> > > >> A computer, when it is logged in, is a member of 'Authenticated > > >> Users' > > >> > > >> Rowland > > >> > > > > > > That is exactly the reason why I would expect computer > > > configuration group policy to work with Domain Computers group. > > > > > > But your note inspired me to make another test. I changed Security > > > Filtering from Domain Computers group to a computer account, in my > > > case WINMG...