search for: otternetworks

On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 12:46 PM, Andrew Holway <andrew.holway at gmail.com> wrote: > In the context of this discussion I would appreciate any feedback the list > might have on this article I wrote for my new company. > > http://otternetworks.de/tech/rhel-centos-brief/ Well put. For a non-technical person, your brief clues them in to the differences between RHEL and CentOS. And the reason both coexist. I do however agree with Valeri in that you probably (c|s)hould mention Debian in there somewhere. I realize you left Debian out beca...

In the context of this discussion I would appreciate any feedback the list might have on this article I wrote for my new company. http://otternetworks.de/tech/rhel-centos-brief/ I for one welcome our Redhat overlords. I think they will provide better governance which should give Centos better credibility as an Enterprise, community supported operating system. On 4 April 2015 at 17:17, Lamar Owen <lowen at pari.edu> wrote: > On 04/04/2...

On Sat, April 4, 2015 11:46 am, Andrew Holway wrote: > In the context of this discussion I would appreciate any feedback the list > might have on this article I wrote for my new company. > > http://otternetworks.de/tech/rhel-centos-brief/ Once you asked for comments, here it goes: You are saying: "Currently is appears that there are two strong contenders for a Linux distribution. Ubuntu and Redhat Enterprise Linux/Centos." You seem to be overlooking Debian. Ubuntu (and many others) at some poi...

Almost everyone here has probably read this by now. If so, move along, nothing new here. But just in case you haven't, please take the time to read this. Here it is, in their own words: what Redhat thinks of Centos, and it's plans for the future of Centos. Can you read between the lines? In this case, it isn't very hard to do, IMHO. community.redhat.com/centos-faq