Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "otphqp".
2019 Jan 30
2
[RFC] Generate Debug Information for Labels in Function
...as there a consensus on what should happen if we
> end up with multiple dbg.label intrinsics for the same label due to
> code duplication?
>
> Here is an example where we get two "#DEBUG_LABEL: main:foo" but only one
> DW_TAG_label for "foo": https://godbolt.org/z/oTpHQp
>
> Maybe that is as expected, or is it allowed to have multiple DW_TAG_label
> for the same label name?
>
> /Björn
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: llvm-dev <llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org> On Behalf Of Adrian
> > Prantl via llvm-dev
> >...
2018 Mar 30
4
[RFC] Generate Debug Information for Labels in Function
> On Mar 30, 2018, at 9:25 AM, Adrian Prantl via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
>
>
>> On Mar 29, 2018, at 11:29 PM, Hsiangkai Wang <hsiangkai at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I agree with you. Attach debug metadata to basic block will be a
>> better solution. I will change my design to convey debug metadata
>> through basic block