Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "otherise".
Did you mean:
otherwise
2006 Feb 22
1
SV: Re: SV: Re: SV: Re: Fromstring when sending e-mailonrecievedvoicemail
...fig row can only be up to 512 characters due to a
; limitation in the Asterisk configuration subsystem.
;emailsubject=[PBX]: New message ${VM_MSGNUM} in mailbox ${VM_MAILBOX}
; The following definition is very close to the default, but the default
shows
; just the CIDNAME, if it is not null, otherise just the CIDNUM, or "an
unknown
; caller", if they are both null.
emailbody=Dear ${VM_NAME}:\n\n\tjust wanted to let you know you were
just left a ${VM_DUR} long message (number ${VM_MSGNUM})\nin mailbox
${VM_MAILBOX} from ${VM_CALLERID}, on ${VM_DATE}, so you might\nwant
;
-Barry Fla...
2006 Feb 22
1
SV: Re: SV: Re: Fromstring when sending e-mail onrecievedvoicemail
It's fixed now.
In "/etc/mail/ssmtp.conf", this ("FromLineOverride=YES") line was commented out. Removing that comment did the trick :)
Now I only need to change the e-mail's title. Is that possible?
-----Opprinnelig melding-----
Fra: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] P? vegne av Barry Flanagan
Sendt: 22.
2014 Jan 22
1
type=peer vs type=user (depricated?)
I'm looking at setting type=peer vs type=user (in both IAX and SIP conf entries), and I found a comment attributed to digium (http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/Asterisk+SIP+user+vs+peer) in 2005 that type=user is depricated and that we should only use type=peer
Is that still correct? Will type=user be phased out, and should even new installs of older asterisk versions (eg: 1.6) use
2007 Mar 16
3
Fun with CentOS and Windows
I installed the memory and the CPU and the motherboard and the new video
card all together tonight. CentOS installed very nicely and I'm currently
running the CentOS-Plus version, with which I _can_ access my Windows
partitions. Well, one of the disks is getting flaky and I'm having trouble
with it - of course, that's the one I need the most.
Glitches, with which I would be