search for: othercheck

...corrected with the above tool, assuming > "-f" circumvents this check. I've been tossing the idea around that a > single "-f" might not be the best answer and a longer option > specifying a list of checks to skip might be more balanced, ie "-F > minfatsize,othercheck". > > 3) Ensure that the Syslinux installers state which check failed to > assist users in correcting their file system, regardless of if "-f" is > specified. If "-f" is not specified, installation should fail > completely (hopefully with 0 alterations). If...

...the above tool, assuming >> "-f" circumvents this check. I've been tossing the idea around that a >> single "-f" might not be the best answer and a longer option >> specifying a list of checks to skip might be more balanced, ie "-F >> minfatsize,othercheck". >> >> 3) Ensure that the Syslinux installers state which check failed to >> assist users in correcting their file system, regardless of if "-f" is >> specified. If "-f" is not specified, installation should fail >> completely (hopefully with...

...idual file system is corrected with the above tool, assuming "-f" circumvents this check. I've been tossing the idea around that a single "-f" might not be the best answer and a longer option specifying a list of checks to skip might be more balanced, ie "-F minfatsize,othercheck". 3) Ensure that the Syslinux installers state which check failed to assist users in correcting their file system, regardless of if "-f" is specified. If "-f" is not specified, installation should fail completely (hopefully with 0 alterations). If "-f" is speci...

Hi Ady, Your insightful post prompted me to to a little bit more digging as to how the Ridgecrop algorithm computed its FAT size, with the result of my investigations presented below. NB: For those who don't want to go through this whole part, there's a TL;DR near the end. For reference, the computation of the FAT size all done in the GetFATSizeSectors(), the code of which is at [1]