search for: otah

Displaying 8 results from an estimated 8 matches for "otah".

Did you mean: otoh
2012 Feb 16
2
Fwd: Re: cwRsync got killed...
...which is still looks valid with the expected content (including the manually unpacked nullsoft installer inside the zip)? Jou -------- Original-Nachricht -------- Betreff: Re: cwRsync got killed... Datum: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 16:43:29 +0200 Von: John Doe <**********@gmail.com> An: Joachim Otahal (privat) <Jou at gmx.net> Real name? No, it's not, obviously. For some reason I couldn't post this on the rsync forum, where I found your request. Would you, kindly, consider adding the link there? On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 10:41 PM, Joachim Otahal (privat) <Jou at gmx.net &l...
2012 Apr 12
7
Run rsync even not connected
I hopethis hope this makes sense. How do you make rsync run even when not physically connected to the server? In other words, I run rsync from the terminal via vnc and when I log out of the connection, rsync stops running. Is there a script or something I can use? Sent from my iPhone
2012 Apr 11
6
Rsync to a Remote NAS
Forgive me if this has been addressed here before. We have a remote office that we need to backup to our NAS. We have a site to site certificate VPN. The remote site has over 51gb that needs to be backed up to our NAS over that VPN. I have tried this command: rsync --verbose --progress --stats --compress --recursive --times --perms --links --delete /Share/* /
2011 Nov 26
0
rsync Digest, Vol 107, Issue 24
...kell) > 2. Re: cwRsync got killed... (Steven Levine) > 3. [Bug 8416] Please include systemd service file > (samba-bugs at samba.org) > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: "Benjamin R. Haskell" <rsync at benizi.com> > To: "Joachim Otahal (privat)" <Jou at gmx.net> > Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2011 14:29:56 -0500 (EST) > Subject: Re: cwRsync got killed... > On Fri, 25 Nov 2011, Joachim Otahal (privat) wrote: > > Last cwrsync was 4.1.0, current is 4.2.0. >> >> It was avail on sourceforge. >> >...
2012 Mar 20
4
Batch mode creates huge diffs, bug(s)?
So the short summary of my problem is, the batch file rsync creates is HUGE for a very small change. The idea is to create workstation image with partimage, update it with some software and send the image update diff over the wire to a large number of destinations over a satellite link, but the batch file updates are several orders of magnitude too large. I don't know exactly how partimage
2011 Nov 25
1
cwRsync got killed...
Last cwrsync was 4.1.0, current is 4.2.0. It was avail on sourceforge. Itefix.no decided "we want money for coding and support" - that itself is not wrong. Though _I_ never needed any rsync help on neither linux and windows (including mixed) scenarios. But they killed their sourceforge downloads, all, including past versions of cwrsync, including source. The 4.2.0 client is still
2011 Dec 22
3
Static server side listing
I've looking for a solution for this and no amount of googling has come up with anything. Is it possible to provide a static listing on a server, say every 24 hours, that a standard end-user rsync can pull and use? I have a lot of files to provide and the idea of every request dynamically providing a file list in real time is killing my server and is simply not needed. I am quite prepared to
2013 Mar 18
12
Impossible or Possible to Securely Erase File on Btrfs?
Hi, After reading through the btrfs documentation I''m curious to know if it''s possible to ever securely erase a file from a btrfs filesystem (or ZFS for that matter). On non-COW filesystems atop regular HDDs one can simply overwrite the file with zeros or random data using dd or some other tool and rest assured that the blocks which contained the sensitive information have