search for: osts

I installed 1 MDS , 2 OSS/OST and 2 Lustre Client. My MDS shows: [code] [root at MDS ~]# lctl list_nids 10.94.214.185 at tcp [root at MDS ~]# [/code] On Lustre Client1: [code] [root at lustreclient1 lustre]# lfs df -h UUID bytes Used Available Use% Mounted on lustre-MDT0000_UUID 4.5G 274.3M 3.9G 6% /mnt/lustre[MDT:0]

Hello, When I run a "df -i" in my clients I get 95% indes used or 5% inodes free: Filesystem Inodes IUsed IFree IUse% Mounted on lustre-mds-01:lustre-mds-02:/cetafs 22200087 20949839 1250248 95% /mnt/data But if I run lfs df -i i get: UUID Inodes IUsed IFree I

I installed 1 MDS , 2 OSS/OST and 2 Lustre Client. My MDS shows: [code] [root at MDS ~]# lctl list_nids 10.94.214.185 at tcp [root at MDS ~]# [/code] On Lustre Client1: [code] [root at lustreclient1 lustre]# lfs df -h UUID bytes Used Available Use% Mounted on lustre-MDT0000_UUID 4.5G 274.3M 3.9G 6% /mnt/lustre[MDT:0] lustre-OST0000_UUID

Hi I want my lustre do such things during OST failed: if some file has stripe data on th failed OST, any operation on the file will return IO error without blocking, and also at this moment I can create and read/write new file or read/write files which have no stripe data on the failed OST without blocking. What should I do ? How to configure? thanks! swin -------------- next part

Hi all, after installing a Lustre test file system consisting of 34 OSTs, I encountered a strange error when trying to set up quotas: lfs quotacheck gave me an "Input/Output error", while in /var/log/kern.log I found a Lustre error LustreError: 20807:0:(quota_check.c:227:lov_quota_check()) lov idx 32 inactive Indeed, in /proc/fs/lustre/lov/.../target_obd...

I am compiling the Embedding examples in the tests directory and get an undefined reference. I include the make output as well as grep'd output of nm on libR.so and compiler and arch information. Do I have an improperly built R shared library or is there a problem with the Embedding tests or something else I am not seeing? Thanks for any help! George ost at

Hi; One of our OSTs filled up. Once we realized this, we executed lctl --device 9 deactivate on our fs''s combo MDS/MGS machine. We saw in the syslog that the OST in question was deactivated: Lustre: setting import ufhpc-OST0008_UUID INACTIVE by administrator request However, ''lfs df'' o...

Hi, everyone, I need some help in figuring out what may have happened here, as newly created files on an OST are being corrupted. I don''t know if this applies to all files written to this OST, or just to files of order 2GB size, but files are definitely being corrupted, with no errors reported by the OSS machine. Let me describe the situation. We had been running Lustre 1.8.4 for

....6 MB/s beda:/mnt/lustre# dd bs=100M count=10 < /dev/zero > qqq.tmp qqq.tmp: No space left on device. beda:/mnt/lustre# dd bs=100M count=10 < /dev/zero > qqq ^C5+0 records in 5+0 records out 524288000 bytes (524 MB) copied, 7.66803 s, 68.4 MB/s But there are a lot of free space both on OSTs and MDS: [client]$ lfs df -h UUID bytes Used Available Use% Mounted on lustre-MDT0000_UUID 43.8G 813.4M 40.5G 1% /mnt/lustre[MDT:0] lustre-OST0000_UUID 867.7G 45.8G 777.8G 5% /mnt/lustre[OST:0] lustre-OST0001_UUID 916.9G 44.9G 825.4G...

All, I''ve added a new 2.2 TB OST to my cluster easily enough, but this new disk array is meant to replace several smaller OSTs that I used to have of which were only 120 GB, 500 GB, and 700 GB. Adding an OST is easy, but how do I REMOVE the small OSTs that I no longer want to be part of my cluster? Is there a command to tell luster to move all the file stripes off one of the nodes? [lab01]/proc/fs/lustre> cat v...

I want to config one 50T OST stroage, is it okay? Since I know that the limitation of ext3 is 1XT. Thnaks

Hi everyone, I have seen this question here before, but without a very satisfactory answer. One of our half a dozen clients has lost access to a set of OSTs: > lfs osts OBDS:: 0: lustre-OST0000_UUID ACTIVE 1: lustre-OST0001_UUID ACTIVE 2: lustre-OST0002_UUID INACTIVE 3: lustre-OST0003_UUID INACTIVE 4: lustre-OST0004_UUID INACTIVE 5: lustre-OST0005_UUID ACTIVE 6: lustre-OST0006_UUID ACTIVE All OSTs show as completely fine on the other clients, and...

Hello, we wounder whether is it possible to add OSTs to the Lustre with quota support without making it offline? We tried to do this but all quota information was lost. Despite the fact that OST was formatted with quota support we are receiving this error message: Lustre: 3743:0:(lproc_quota.c:447:lprocfs_quota_wr_type()) lustrefs-OST0016: quota...

Hi all, we use SLES 11 and Lustre 1.8.1.1 + patches and like convert a lustre FS using external journals to one with async journals enabled. Question is whether the procedure: umount <filesystem> on all clients umount <osts> on all OSSes e2fsck <ost-device> on all OSSes for all all OSTs tune2fs -O ^has_journal <ost-device> on all OSSes for all all OSTs lctl set_param obdfilter.*.sync_journal=0 on all OSSes mount <osts> on all OSSes mount <filesy...

We are seeing some disturbing (probably due to our ignorance) behavior from lustre 1.6.3 right now. We have 8 OSSs with 3 OSTs per OSS (24 physical LUNs). We just created a brand new lustre file system across this configuration using the default mkfs.lustre formatting options. We have this file system mounted across 400 clients. At the moment, we have 63 IOzone threads running on roughly 60 different client...

Hi, I see some unusual block allocations on my OSTs, and I was wondering if someone could explain to my why, and help me to fix a performance problem. In order to track down a performance issue, I ran the following test: - I reformatted my OSTS (I have 4 OSTs). - I created a 10G file on each OST. - I ran dumpe2fs to see if I had some unusual...

...ng to figure out a way to get a list of files with objects present on an OST that is down. Normally one could do: lfs find -O <OST> dir but that is giving us Input/output errors (I assume because the OST is down). Is there a good way to get a list of objects (Maybe from the MDS?), what OSTs they are on, and correlate them with files? Thanks, Mark -- Mark Nelson, Lead Software Developer Minnesota Supercomputing Institute Phone: (612)626-4479 Email: mark at msi.umn.edu

...e-param --mgsnode=192.168.16.3 at tcp --writeconf /dev/sdc1 After copying with rsync, I had to cd /srv/mdt; rm CATALOGS OBJECTS/* on the new MDT partition. I also upgraded from 1.8.8 to 2. I managed to mount the Lustre filesystem and if I do lfs df -h, I get: NB> I deactivated those two OSTs below. [root at mgs data]# lfs df -h UUID bytes Used Available Use% Mounted on AC3-MDT0000_UUID 37.5G 499.5M 34.5G 1% /data[MDT:0] AC3-OST0000_UUID 16.4T 2.2T 13.3T 14% /data[OST:0] AC3-OST0001_UUID 16.4T...

my data looks like this: PM10 Ref UZ JZ WT RH FT WR 1 10.973195 4.338874 nein Winter Dienstag ja nein West 2 6.381684 2.250446 nein Sommer Sonntag nein ja Süd 3 62.586512 66.304869 ja Sommer Sonntag nein nein Ost 4 5.590101 8.526152 ja Sommer Donnerstag nein nein Nord 5 30.925054 16.073091 nein Winter Sonntag nein nein Ost 6

dear R users, my data looks like this PM10 Ref UZ JZ WT RH FT WR 1 10.973195 4.338874 nein Winter Dienstag ja nein West 2 6.381684 2.250446 nein Sommer Sonntag nein ja Süd 3 62.586512 66.304869 ja Sommer Sonntag nein nein Ost 4 5.590101 8.526152 ja Sommer Donnerstag nein nein Nord 5 30.925054 16.073091 nein Winter Sonntag nein