search for: ostruct

...tion'': ActiveRecord::ConnectionNotEstablished (ActiveRecord::ConnectionNotEstablished) Do I have to require something else? This is what I am already requiring: require ''rubygems'' require ''hpricot'' require ''open-uri'' require ''ostruct'' require ''active_record'' Greg -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez...

Hi everybody, I just started thinking about a project and am seeking some help regarding its design. The idea would be to create labels (i.e. address labels).I could let users type the text manually, but I dont think they would appreciate that when they''ll want to print 5000 addresses. I can also probably let them import csv files, that should not be a problem, but playing with those

...#39; operation (that writes device content to stdout) is reasonably fast with both language implementaitions (doing around 70 MiB/s). Why is this, how the Go binding could be improved? Regards, Csaba <code lang="ruby"> #!/usr/bin/env ruby require 'optparse' require 'ostruct' require 'guestfs' module BaseOp extend self def included mod mod.module_eval { extend self } end def perform gu, opts, gudev end attr_reader :readonly end module OPS extend self def find name m = self.constants.find { |c| c.to_s.downcase == name } m ? cons...

...d. Can you enable tracing in both (g.set_trace (true)) and make sure that the operations being done are the same for both languages? Rich. > Regards, > Csaba > > > <code lang="ruby"> > #!/usr/bin/env ruby > > require 'optparse' > require 'ostruct' > require 'guestfs' > > module BaseOp > extend self > > def included mod > mod.module_eval { extend self } > end > > def perform gu, opts, gudev > end > > attr_reader :readonly > end > > module OPS > extend self >...

I''ve inherited an EAV database and there''s really no option to remodel it. Data is stored as key_name, key_value pairs Trying to return a meaningful, unified recordset is far too complex to be efficient. I''ve decided to make use of the MySQL GROUP_CONCAT, and CONCAT_WS functions to return a fast query result, with the consolidated fields as one string. The final data is