Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "osterholm".
2017 Aug 21
5
Updated Apache httpd packages?
I'm concerned about the vulnerability at https://access.redhat.com/
errata/RHSA-2017:2479
I see via https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/
2017-August/022518.html that Centos 6 has received the fix for this. Is
there a roadmap for when Centos 7 will receive the fix?
Thanks!
2017 Aug 23
3
Updated Apache httpd packages?
On 08/22/2017 03:21 AM, Rainer Traut wrote:
>
>
> Am 21.08.2017 um 21:40 schrieb Erik Osterholm:
>> I'm concerned about the vulnerability at https://access.redhat.com/
>> errata/RHSA-2017:2479
>>
>> I see via https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/
>> 2017-August/022518.html that Centos 6 has received the fix for this. Is
>> there a roadmap...
2017 Aug 24
1
Updated Apache httpd packages?
Am 23.08.2017 um 16:31 schrieb Johnny Hughes:
> On 08/22/2017 03:21 AM, Rainer Traut wrote:
>>
>>
>> Am 21.08.2017 um 21:40 schrieb Erik Osterholm:
>>> I'm concerned about the vulnerability at https://access.redhat.com/
>>> errata/RHSA-2017:2479
>>>
>>> I see via https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/
>>> 2017-August/022518.html that Centos 6 has received the fix for this. Is
>&...
2017 Aug 21
0
Updated Apache httpd packages?
On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 02:40:59PM -0500, Erik Osterholm wrote:
> I'm concerned about the vulnerability at https://access.redhat.com/
> errata/RHSA-2017:2479
>
> I see via https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/
> 2017-August/022518.html that Centos 6 has received the fix for this. Is
> there a roadmap for when Centos 7...
2017 Aug 22
0
Updated Apache httpd packages?
Am 21.08.2017 um 21:40 schrieb Erik Osterholm:
> I'm concerned about the vulnerability at https://access.redhat.com/
> errata/RHSA-2017:2479
>
> I see via https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/
> 2017-August/022518.html that Centos 6 has received the fix for this. Is
> there a roadmap for when Centos 7 will...
2017 Aug 24
0
Updated Apache httpd packages?
On 08/24/2017 06:57 AM, Rainer Traut wrote:
>
> Am 23.08.2017 um 16:31 schrieb Johnny Hughes:
>> On 08/22/2017 03:21 AM, Rainer Traut wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Am 21.08.2017 um 21:40 schrieb Erik Osterholm:
>>>> I'm concerned about the vulnerability at https://access.redhat.com/
>>>> errata/RHSA-2017:2479
>>>>
>>>> I see via https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/
>>>> 2017-August/022518.html that Centos 6 has received the fi...
2010 Sep 10
0
Custom package provider -- not stored locally?
I have a package provider which is a modified form of one of the
default ones in the FreeBSD ports version of Puppet 2.6.1r3. I placed
the provider in /usr/local/etc/puppet/modules/test/lib/puppet/
provider/ and ran puppetd on the client with the following command
line:
puppetd -o --no-daemonize -l console --pluginsync --server example.net
I got the following output:
notice: