search for: ostensively

Why, in R, does (0.1 + 0.05) > 0.15 evaluate to True? What am I missing here? How can I ensure this (ostensibly incorrect) behavior doesn't introduce bugs into my code? Thanks for your time. Dave Mitchell [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

(another in an ongoing list of things i just want to clarify for the sake of future courses taught on centos.) from this RHEL doc page: http://docs.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/5/html/Deployment_Guide/s1-openssh-server-config.html the reader is advised to, for the sake of security, remove/disable vsftpd, ostensibly in favour of sftp/sftp-server. really? i can obviously

Hello. I am trying to invert a matrix, and I am finding that I can get different answers depending on whether I set LAPACK true or false using "qr". I had understood that LAPACK is, in general more robust and faster than LINPACK, so I am confused as to why I am getting what seems to be invalid answers. The matrix is ostensibly the Hessian for a function I am optimizing. I want to get

Folks, I fully understand the emotional need to respond to one who throws around terms like "Communist", "Tyrannical", etc. even if ostensibly framed as a rhetorical question. Certain terms and phrases are by nature pejorative and I;m sure the OP knew this when he entered his post. My feeling was the OP is either an ignorant, unappreciative, self-centered, and emotionally

Did anyone else who purchased the Rails betabook get a telephone call from someone at "Humboldt Merchants" (sp?) asking to verify their purchase, ostensibly to ensure there was no fraud (on the part of the merchant, not the person buying the book)? They knew my name, phone number, the title of the book I bought and the type of credit card I used. They didn''t give or ask for the

I was about to post a bug concerning this, but I thought I'd check with you folks first. The symptom is a SIGSEGV in my program in the standard library template for red black trees (bits/stl_tree.h). The crash occurs as the result of an LLVM Module method, getConstantPointerRef which looks like: // Accessor for the underlying GlobalValRefMap... ConstantPointerRef

I''m using this: <% words = article.content.split(/ /) %> <%= words[0..20] %> to (ostensibly) split a paragraph into component words, with spaces in between, then print to html only the first 20 items, words and spaces. I got this (split(/ /)) from the online pickaxe book at http://rubycentral.com/book/ref_c_string.html#String.split . The problem is, the resulting array

On 06/12/2015 01:40 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 06/13/2015 12:11 PM, jd1008 wrote: >> Why do you make such statements without knowing the intrinsics??? >> How in tarnation do you explain this: >> http://www.google.com/safebrowsing/diagnostic?site=googleusercontent.com > > That site doesn't say anything about Java or Javascript. Or cookies > for that matter.

I'm having a spot of bother using code that worked with R-1.7.1 but will not work with 1.8.1. The beginning of the saga is with grid.polygon ostensibly not findable. One does exist in ..../R-1.8.1/library/grid/R, and when I specifically load the grid package (which probably isn't a good idea), it starts finding fault with the length of vectors being unequal. I suspect the lengths of the

Malcolm Scott <newsgroups1_m@lcolm.NOSPAM.org.uk> writes: > Sorry! I had assumed that, because it was free and for Linux, that it > was GPL :-( I'll be more careful in the future... Actually, most ostensibly "Linux" distributions contain *large* amounts of software that is under various licenses other than the GPL. University licenses especially, and particularly the

On Mon, 2 Feb 2004, Reid Spencer wrote: > > _Link_type __x = _M_root(); // Current node. > > The _M_root() call is de-referencing the _M_header field. > > This could, ostensibly, be a bug in std::_Rb_tree template but it could > also be a usage problem. > > Note that the GVRefMap (in Module.cpp) has no constructor and just uses > the default. Presumably the default

Chris, it is goodness that the LandingpadInst will be pinned to the beginning of a BasicBlock,... except for the possibility of PHINode instructions that _must_ come even earlier.?. I can't exactly put my finger on what's going to go wrong with this, but it sure smells fishy... my current understanding is that the LandingpadInst will "define" some hard

Hi all I recenty bought a dedicated server with the intention of configuring Xen on it. However, I''ve run into a _really_ strange issue: Whenever i reboot (run reboot or shutdown -r now) the physical host it shuts down (powers off) instead. The problems only seems to occur if I actually start a virtual machine. If I simply reboot the physical machine without starting xend or any

I wanted to go through and map out the layering of LLD's libraries today and found that it's essentially impossible. I think some serious cleanup is needed here. Let's start with the purely link-level dependencies encoded in the CMake build: Curently the Core library depends on the ReaderWriter/Native library, which links against the ReaderWriter library, which links against the Core

...on classes in the Click code which depends on the Ads code... These dependencies have left me confused about the best way to deploy. My initial thought was to just deploy the complete app to all 3 servers and whatever code gets used, gets used. Since they are all on the same database cluster, you ostensively could use any part of the code on any of the servers; it''s all controlled by how we drive the specific traffic to the servers (via DNS/domainnames). Anyone see problems with this? Is there a better way? Maybe something fancy with Capistrano, et al? Thanks, Ed

Hi Peter, Thanks for pointing this out. Some us who are concerned with codegen have discussed the problem. Although the details aren't decided, you can be sure that at the MachineInstr level we won't have a landindpadInst to model liveness of exception values. Any physical registers set by the personality function will be considered live immediately after the call on the unwind path.

Andrew, yes, my brain-bad, soon after I hit the Send button I realized it is the InvokeInst that starts the lifetime of those hard-registers, not the LandingpadInst, but you beat me to the reply. -Peter Lawrence. On Aug 4, 2011, at 4:16 PM, Andrew Trick wrote: > Hi Peter, > > Thanks for pointing this out. Some us who are concerned with > codegen have discussed

Hello, I am testing out a partial that calls another, general purpose partial as part of its processing. Is there a class I can mock in Rails views to accomplish what I need? That is, could I do something like the following: SomeClass.should_receive(:render).with(:partial => "foo", :locals => { :bars => bars }) I tried breakpointing the view, and it looks like I am greeted

Well, is that possible to include libstdc++4.7 into llvm? On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 2:26 AM, Brian Cain <brian.cain at gmail.com> wrote: > Sorry if I was unclear, I have no problems building clang against a newer > gcc for my own purpose. But it doesn't make sense to provide a release > binary for clang that's hosted on llvm.org that's ostensibly for >

Caching happens, both within the operating system and within the C standard library. Ostensibly the intent for those caches is to help performance, but you are right that different low-level caching algorithms can be a poor match for specific application level use cases such as copying files or parsing text syntax. However, the OS and even the specific file system drivers (e.g. ext4 on flash disk