search for: ost0008

...r I had made a mistake with the RAID configuration of about half of the OSTs. Therefore I had mounted one OST from each OSS, while the others were still formatting. Consequently, after mounting all OSTs, their OST-Names or OST-indices were not in OSS machine order, like machine 5 now providing OST0008 and OST001a. I''d like to hear from the experts that this cannot possibly have any influence on the functionality of a Lustre cluster. That still leaves the question how I managed to produce this gap in the OST numbering and why the quota setup should stumble over this. In the meantime...

...276.1M 5.3G 5% /mnt/lustre[OST:4] lustre-OST0005_UUID 5.9G 276.1M 5.3G 5% /mnt/lustre[OST:5] lustre-OST0006_UUID 5.9G 276.1M 5.3G 5% /mnt/lustre[OST:6] lustre-OST0007_UUID 5.9G 276.1M 5.3G 5% /mnt/lustre[OST:7] lustre-OST0008_UUID 5.9G 276.1M 5.3G 5% /mnt/lustre[OST:8] lustre-OST0009_UUID 5.9G 276.1M 5.3G 5% /mnt/lustre[OST:9] lustre-OST000a_UUID 5.9G 276.1M 5.3G 5% /mnt/lustre[OST:10] lustre-OST000b_UUID 5.9G 276.1M 5.3G 5% /mnt/...

...G 276.1M 5.3G 5% /mnt/lustre[OST:4] lustre-OST0005_UUID 5.9G 276.1M 5.3G 5% /mnt/lustre[OST:5] lustre-OST0006_UUID 5.9G 276.1M 5.3G 5% /mnt/lustre[OST:6] lustre-OST0007_UUID 5.9G 276.1M 5.3G 5% /mnt/lustre[OST:7] lustre-OST0008_UUID 5.9G 276.1M 5.3G 5% /mnt/lustre[OST:8] lustre-OST0009_UUID 5.9G 276.1M 5.3G 5% /mnt/lustre[OST:9] lustre-OST000a_UUID 5.9G 276.1M 5.3G 5% /mnt/lustre[OST:10] lustre-OST000b_UUID 5.9G 276.1M 5.3G 5% /mnt/lus...

...OST0004_UUID 4.3T 4.1T 17.2G 100% /data[OST:4] AC3-OST0005_UUID 1.9T 1.8T 29.0M 100% /data[OST:5] AC3-OST0006_UUID 1.9T 1.5T 282.1G 85% /data[OST:6] AC3-OST0007_UUID 1.9T 1.8T 434.3M 100% /data[OST:7] AC3-OST0008_UUID 1.9T 1.8T 12.9G 99% /data[OST:8] OST0009 : Resource temporarily unavailable AC3-OST000a_UUID 2.0T 1.9T 971.7M 100% /data[OST:10] AC3-OST000b_UUID 2.0T 1.9T 537.4M 100% /data[OST:11] AC3-OST000c_UUID 2...