search for: osdevic

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Daniel Dunbar" <daniel at zuster.org> > To: "Renato Golin" <renato.golin at linaro.org> > Cc: "Hal Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov>, "Marshall Clow" <mclow.lists at gmail.com>, "LLVM Dev" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2013 12:30:12 PM > Subject: Re:

On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org>wrote: > On 12 March 2013 16:48, Daniel Dunbar <daniel at zuster.org> wrote: > >> The former mode is historically what the test suite did, the latter mode >> is substantially faster (and independent of bugs in the native CC). >> > > Yes, I agree this is better for many cases, but

On 05/03/2016 02:31 AM, Thomas Schmitt via Syslinux wrote: > Hi, > > John Lewis wrote: >> https://help.ubuntu.com/community/LiveCDCustomizationFromScratch >> >> The show stopper for me was the mkisofs because the closest command I >> had available was xorrisofs and I think a switch was different. > If you have questions about xorrisofs, then just ask me. :))

Hello, I’ve been using LLVM IR passes for my research for about a year now, but for my next step I think I might have to dig into a backend. I'm hoping someone could give me a pointer on how to get started. The thing I would like to do is add and override address-size override prefix [1] to a given x86-64 instruction. I’m hoping I can do something like: 1) Mark some IR instructions with

For example something like STARTUP ( http://wiki.osdev.org/Linker_Scripts#STARTUP) is not accepted by the LLVM LLD. :-/ On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 9:08 PM, Sky Flyer <skylake007 at gmail.com> wrote: > Yeah I found it, that's nice. Thanks a milion. > Could you please tell me how can I specify my bootstrap (startup code) in > the linking process? > > > On Wed, Apr 20, 2016

On 12 March 2013 19:21, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > +1 > > There are a couple of example implementations here which are only a few > lines long: > http://wiki.osdev.org/Random_Number_Generator I was going to rant about the quality of simple LCGs but it seems that *all* standard implementations rely on that, so the argument of using a standard library against a

Hi, > I only have the vaguest > understand of what the flags in the man page of xorrisofs and xorriso are. The options reflect a long tradition of program mkisofs and the winded road of boot firmware entry points in ISO 9660 filesystems. So one cannot expect to find much of a common system in them. > there doesn't seem to > exist a hello word like exercise that is simple and

Hi, me: > > Please enable editing. Gene Cumm: > Done. Thanks. I have now edited http://www.syslinux.org/wiki/index.php/Hardware_Compatibility#USB-Miscellaneous ------------------------------------------------------------ Next i'll try to develop a user oriented hint for SYSLINUX#Creating_a_Bootable_Disk which takes into respect the opinions of Ady, Mattias, me, and of any

On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 1:57 AM Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel at redhat.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 01:04:54PM -0800, Alistair Francis wrote: > > The QEMU model for the Bochs display has no VGA memory section at offset > > 0x400 [1]. By writing to this register Linux can create a write to > > unassigned memory which depending on machine and architecture can result

On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 1:57 AM Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel at redhat.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 01:04:54PM -0800, Alistair Francis wrote: > > The QEMU model for the Bochs display has no VGA memory section at offset > > 0x400 [1]. By writing to this register Linux can create a write to > > unassigned memory which depending on machine and architecture can result

I''ve been looking into the performance impact of NCQ. Here''s what i found out: http://blogs.sun.com/erickustarz/entry/ncq_performance_analysis Curiously, there''s not too much performance data on NCQ available via a google search ... enjoy, eric

Running an mmap-intensive workload on ZFS on a X4500, Solaris 10 11/06 (update 3). All file IO is mmap(file), read memory segment, unmap, close. Tweaked the arc size down via mdb to 1GB. I used that value because c_min was also 1GB, and I was not sure if c_max could be larger than c_min....Anyway, I set c_max to 1GB. After a workload run....: > arc::print -tad { . . . ffffffffc02e29e8

I'm trying to make a security sandbox. For example, lets say my program has a LoadInst in the LLVM IR and I know I want to confine the address range this LoadInst is accessing. Maybe that LoadInst gets emitted as a MOV machine code instruction by the backend. During execution an attacker could potentially control the operands of the MOV instruction through some exploit, but usually he

I was trying to simply test bandwidth that Solaris/ZFS (Nevada b63) can deliver from a drive, and doing this: dd if=(raw disk) of=/dev/null gives me around 80MB/s, while dd if=(file on ZFS) of=/dev/null gives me only 35MB/s!?. I am getting basically the same result whether it is single zfs drive, mirror or a stripe (I am testing with two Seagate 7200.10 320G drives hanging off the same interface

Hi, > # Most linux distros dont have `mkisofs' Or they have genisoimage under the name "mkisofs". (e.g. Debian, Archlinux) > mkisofs \ > -o output.iso \ > -no-emul-boot \ > -boot-info-table \ > -boot-load-size 4 \ > -c isolinux/boot.cat \ > -b isolinux/isolinux.bin \ > ISO_root I would add option -R or -r for Rock Ridge names and file

FYI, http://www.informit.com/articles/article.aspx?p=1215438 -Rajika -- http://wso2.org/ http://llvm.org/ http://www.osdev.org/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20090405/79ddb769/attachment.html>

On Mar 12, 2013, at 12:48, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: On 12 March 2013 19:21, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > +1 > > There are a couple of example implementations here which are only a few > lines long: > http://wiki.osdev.org/Random_Number_Generator I was going to rant about the quality of simple LCGs but it seems that *all* standard

Hi, Duncan Elliot wrote: > What is the thought process of clearing the ISO MBR? It is not necessary in the partok case, because the partition to which you copy the image encloses the ISO, exposes it for mounting, and protects it from partition editors. (Another idea from assembler riddling turned out to be a red herring.) Without understanding the language or the BIOS habits of MBR

On Mon, Mar 02, 2020 at 02:14:02PM -0800, Alistair Francis wrote: > On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 1:57 AM Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel at redhat.com> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 01:04:54PM -0800, Alistair Francis wrote: > > > The QEMU model for the Bochs display has no VGA memory section at offset > > > 0x400 [1]. By writing to this register Linux can create a

On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 2:31 AM, Thomas Schmitt <scdbackup at gmx.net> wrote: > Hi, > > > # Most linux distros dont have `mkisofs' ( > > Or they have genisoimage under the name "mkisofs". > (e.g. Debian, Archlinux) > ... > I would add option -R or -r for Rock Ridge names and file attributes. > This will make appear the files with their original