search for: os_package_format_unknown

.../src/inspect-fs.c +++ b/src/inspect-fs.c @@ -494,6 +494,7 @@ guestfs_int_check_package_format (guestfs_h *g, struct inspect_fs *fs) case OS_DISTRO_FREEBSD: case OS_DISTRO_NETBSD: case OS_DISTRO_OPENBSD: + case OS_DISTRO_ALPINE_LINUX: case OS_DISTRO_UNKNOWN: fs->package_format = OS_PACKAGE_FORMAT_UNKNOWN; break; @@ -565,6 +566,7 @@ guestfs_int_check_package_management (guestfs_h *g, struct inspect_fs *fs) case OS_DISTRO_FREEBSD: case OS_DISTRO_NETBSD: case OS_DISTRO_OPENBSD: + case OS_DISTRO_ALPINE_LINUX: case OS_DISTRO_UNKNOWN: fs->package_management = OS_PACKAGE_MANAGEME...

.../inspect-fs.c +++ b/src/inspect-fs.c @@ -499,6 +499,7 @@ guestfs_int_check_package_format (guestfs_h *g, struct inspect_fs *fs) case OS_DISTRO_OPENBSD: case OS_DISTRO_FRUGALWARE: case OS_DISTRO_PLD_LINUX: + case OS_DISTRO_VOID_LINUX: case OS_DISTRO_UNKNOWN: fs->package_format = OS_PACKAGE_FORMAT_UNKNOWN; break; @@ -583,6 +584,7 @@ guestfs_int_check_package_management (guestfs_h *g, struct inspect_fs *fs) case OS_DISTRO_OPENBSD: case OS_DISTRO_FRUGALWARE: case OS_DISTRO_PLD_LINUX: + case OS_DISTRO_VOID_LINUX: case OS_DISTRO_UNKNOWN: fs->package_management = OS_PACKAGE_MANA...

...STRO_TTYLINUX: case OS_DISTRO_COREOS: @@ -494,7 +498,6 @@ guestfs_int_check_package_format (guestfs_h *g, struct inspect_fs *fs) case OS_DISTRO_FREEBSD: case OS_DISTRO_NETBSD: case OS_DISTRO_OPENBSD: - case OS_DISTRO_ALPINE_LINUX: case OS_DISTRO_UNKNOWN: fs->package_format = OS_PACKAGE_FORMAT_UNKNOWN; break; @@ -556,6 +559,10 @@ guestfs_int_check_package_management (guestfs_h *g, struct inspect_fs *fs) fs->package_management = OS_PACKAGE_MANAGEMENT_ZYPPER; break; + case OS_DISTRO_ALPINE_LINUX: + fs->package_management = OS_PACKAGE_MANAGEMENT_APK; + break; + case...

...a/src/inspect-fs.c +++ b/src/inspect-fs.c @@ -499,6 +499,7 @@ guestfs_int_check_package_format (guestfs_h *g, struct inspect_fs *fs) case OS_DISTRO_FREEBSD: case OS_DISTRO_NETBSD: case OS_DISTRO_OPENBSD: + case OS_DISTRO_FRUGALWARE: case OS_DISTRO_UNKNOWN: fs->package_format = OS_PACKAGE_FORMAT_UNKNOWN; break; @@ -575,6 +576,7 @@ guestfs_int_check_package_management (guestfs_h *g, struct inspect_fs *fs) case OS_DISTRO_FREEBSD: case OS_DISTRO_NETBSD: case OS_DISTRO_OPENBSD: + case OS_DISTRO_FRUGALWARE: case OS_DISTRO_UNKNOWN: fs->package_management = OS_PACKAGE_MANAGEMENT...

...,6 +448,8 @@ guestfs___check_package_format (guestfs_h *g, struct inspect_fs *fs) case OS_DISTRO_BUILDROOT: case OS_DISTRO_CIRROS: case OS_DISTRO_FREEDOS: + case OS_DISTRO_FREEBSD: + case OS_DISTRO_NETBSD: case OS_DISTRO_OPENBSD: case OS_DISTRO_UNKNOWN: fs->package_format = OS_PACKAGE_FORMAT_UNKNOWN; @@ -507,6 +509,8 @@ guestfs___check_package_management (guestfs_h *g, struct inspect_fs *fs) case OS_DISTRO_BUILDROOT: case OS_DISTRO_CIRROS: case OS_DISTRO_FREEDOS: + case OS_DISTRO_FREEBSD: + case OS_DISTRO_NETBSD: case OS_DISTRO_OPENBSD: case OS_DISTRO_UNKNOWN: fs->pack...

...,6 +448,8 @@ guestfs___check_package_format (guestfs_h *g, struct inspect_fs *fs) case OS_DISTRO_BUILDROOT: case OS_DISTRO_CIRROS: case OS_DISTRO_FREEDOS: + case OS_DISTRO_FREEBSD: + case OS_DISTRO_NETBSD: case OS_DISTRO_OPENBSD: case OS_DISTRO_UNKNOWN: fs->package_format = OS_PACKAGE_FORMAT_UNKNOWN; @@ -507,6 +509,8 @@ guestfs___check_package_management (guestfs_h *g, struct inspect_fs *fs) case OS_DISTRO_BUILDROOT: case OS_DISTRO_CIRROS: case OS_DISTRO_FREEDOS: + case OS_DISTRO_FREEBSD: + case OS_DISTRO_NETBSD: case OS_DISTRO_OPENBSD: case OS_DISTRO_UNKNOWN: fs->pack...

From: Michael Scherer <misc at zarb.org> Without this, configure will always enable erlang, no matter what argument are passed. Now, we can disable it, even if configure still need the erlang compiler for some obscure reason. --- configure.ac | 10 ++++++---- 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac index 337a3ed..e0bed2f 100644 ---

v9 was here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00139.html This depends on these three series (the first two being single minor patches): https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00207.html https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00209.html https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00215.html There is no substantive change. I

This depends on the patch series "[PATCH 00/27] Reimplement many daemon APIs in OCaml." (https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00098.html) v8 was posted here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00274.html v9: - I split up the mega-patch into a more reviewable series of smaller, incremental patches. There are some other changes vs v8, but

This fixes almost everything. Note that it adds an extra commit which fixes the whole utf8/iconv business. It's probably better to list what isn't fixed: (1) I didn't leave the osinfo code around because I'm still haven't looked too closely at virt-builder-repository. Can't we just fetch this code from the git history when we need it? (2) I didn't change the way

v10: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00245.html No actual change here, but I rebased and retested. Also this series now does not depend on any other patch series since everything else needed is upstream. Rich.

This is the (incomplete) patch which reimplements inspection APIs in the daemon. All ‘XXX’s in this patch indicate areas which are not yet implemented or need further work. Rich.

v6 was posted here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00103.html and this requires the utilities refactoring posted here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00169.html Inspection is now complete[*], although not very well tested. I'm intending to compare the output of many guests using old & new virt-inspector to see if I can find any

v5: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00065.html Since v5, this now implements inspection almost completely for Linux and Windows guests. Rich.

v7 was: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00169.html https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00184.html I believe this addresses all comments received so far. Also it now passes a test where I compared about 100 disk images processed with old and new virt-inspector binaries. The output is identical in all cases except one which is caused by a bug in blkid