search for: orphan

...n 22, 2018 at 05:24:44PM +0100, Achim Gottinger via samba wrote: > Am 22.01.2018 um 10:49 schrieb Stefan Metzmacher via samba: > > Also DO NOT repair the following errors with samba-tool dbcheck! > > "Remove duplicate links in attribute" > > and > > "ERROR: orphaned backlink" > > as this removes the ability to repair the database > > in the next round of patches! > > > I had this error after upgrading from 4.7.3 to 4.7.4 and used samba-tool > dbcheck --clean to get rid of them. > Replication is still working. What kind of unr...

...06.88GB used 67.29GB path /dev/sda8 Label: none uuid: 4b3e5746-31aa-405a-a41f-540376ea5110 Total devices 1 FS bytes used 17.93GB devid 1 size 40.00GB used 25.54GB path /dev/sda7 Btrfs v0.19+ The home-volume can not be mounted upon started with the msg: btrfs: Error removing orphan entry, stopping orphan cleanup btrfs: could not do orphan cleanup -22 Booting from the latest systemrescuecd (based upon Linux-kernel-3.0 :-( ) a btrfsck-run on the home-vol(sda8) does not report any errors! Whereas upon sda7 I got a lot of reportings concerning /tmp, /.snapshot, /var, /srv, /o...

...t;2000) but now i still have 372 persistant errors and the dbcheck script won't fix them. The domain is still working great, creating / removing users, edit membership, the replication, everything works. Here's a part of the errors, all of them are "missing backlink" or "orphaned backlink". [root at dc1 ~]# samba-tool dbcheck Checking 1233 objects ERROR: orphaned backlink attribute 'memberOf' in CN=Gérard Dellaval,OU=CPAS,OU=MUSERS,DC=contoso,DC=com for link member in CN=cpas_ila,OU=CPAS,OU=MGROUPS,DC=contoso,DC=com Not removing orphaned backlink memberOf...

...---------------------------------------------------------------------- fsck says: e2fsck 1.25 (20-Sep-2001) Warning! /dev/sda8 is mounted. Warning: skipping journal recovery because doing a read-only filesystem check. Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes Inodes that were part of a corrupted orphan linked list found. Fix? no Inode 13 was part of the orphaned inode list. IGNORED. Inode 14 was part of the orphaned inode list. IGNORED. Inode 32807 was part of the orphaned inode list. IGNORED. Inode 49250 was part of the orphaned inode list. IGNORED. Inode 180226 was part of the orphaned in...

...atest 1.20WIP set fixes the problem. I had hoped that booting with rootflags=debug would give me more information, however there is nothing in there thats useful - basically just a JFS DEBUG.... exit status 0, recovered transactions 38212 to 38212, similar summary message and then EXT-fs: 03:01 orphan cleanup on read-only filesystem [I'm retyping these errors so there may be minor mistakes] Running e2fsck on it gives, after some other bits, Clearing orphaned inode 666608 (uid=0, gid=0, mode=0100755, size=456328) Clearing orphaned inode 53304 (uid=0, gid=0, mode=0100755, size=552935) Tr...

...---------------------------------------------------------------------- fsck says: e2fsck 1.25 (20-Sep-2001) Warning! /dev/sda8 is mounted. Warning: skipping journal recovery because doing a read-only filesystem check. Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes Inodes that were part of a corrupted orphan linked list found. Fix? no Inode 13 was part of the orphaned inode list. IGNORED. Inode 14 was part of the orphaned inode list. IGNORED. Inode 32807 was part of the orphaned inode list. IGNORED. Inode 49250 was part of the orphaned inode list. IGNORED. Inode 180226 was part of the orphaned in...

...72 persistant errors and the dbcheck > script won't fix them. > > The domain is still working great, creating / removing users, edit > membership, the replication, everything works. > > Here's a part of the errors, all of them are "missing backlink" or > "orphaned backlink". one of my colleague had the same issue after upgrade to 4.7.0 very recently. We didn't have much time to look into it, so we just cleaned up the member and memberof attributes (samba-tool group removemembers + some ldbmodify) , then add back the users to the groups. It nee...

Because orphan cleanup now happens well after the fs is all initialized and such, we can run into this problem where we find orphan entries that were just added to the fs, not ones that were added previously during a crash. This does not bode well for the system, and results in a couple of odd things happening,...

Srini, Ok, you can go ahead and cook up the background orphan cleaner. Now, we can do this in a workqueue, a thread, or a timer. I don't see why a timer doesn't work. When the timer fires, you do this: 1. Take EX on a new orphan_scan lock. 2. check the LVB for the last scan time. If it's less than the scan timeout, reset the timer for (time...

Currently we only queue recovery during mount if the journal is dirty. If the last node holding orphans in other node's orphan directory dies and is the first one to mount then it only recovers its orphan directory which leaves the orphans in other nodes slots. Since the other nodes journals are clean they will not queue to recover their orphan directory. This patch queues to recover orphans wh...

...tel 0000:00:04.0: setting latency timer to 64 [ 6.928264] Adding 1048572k swap on /dev/sda1. Priority:-1 extents:1 across:1048572k [ 7.008342] device label testfs1 devid 1 transid 4141 /dev/sdb1 [ 7.011071] btrfs: disk space caching is enabled >> [ 7.165692] btrfs: Error removing orphan entry, stopping orphan cleanup >> [ 7.165696] btrfs: could not do orphan cleanup -22 >> [ 8.910980] btrfs: open_ctree failed [ 8.944598] systemd-journald[292]: Received SIGTERM [ 70.616949] systemd-modules-load[453]: Module ''uinput'' is already loaded [ 70....

...e dd is copying the mounted root partition into an alternate partition that is not mounted. The dd returns success, but the fsck on that partition fails with errors as follows: ----------------- fsck 1.37 (21-Mar-2005) /dev/Active_Update/root2: recovering journal /dev/Active_Update/root2: Clearing orphaned inode 57554 (uid=0, gid=0, mode=010600, size=0) /dev/Active_Update/root2: Clearing orphaned inode 57552 (uid=1010, gid=3002, mode=010600, size=0) /dev/Active_Update/root2: Clearing orphaned inode 57548 (uid=0, gid=0, mode=020600, size=0) /dev/Active_Update/root2: Clearing orphaned inode 57547 (ui...

Hi Joel/Srini, Here are 2 patches for orphan lock in local mode. patch 1: In local mode, we don't need lvb, so don't init it. patch 2: In local mode, orphan lock and unlock don't need to go to dlm part. Regards, Tao

...RAN, because it failed the checks and/or the dependencies are not any longer available. The package maintainer has been alerted to this issue a couple of times and kindly asked to fix the code, such that it fullfills the CRAN requirements. However, neither a fix is applied, nor has the package been orphaned such that someone else could take over the ownership and rectify the package. In principal, and if I am not mistaken, one could simply take the code, fix it and release it (the package is under GPL-2). However, I would consider this as a rather rude approach. Hence, my question would be, if the R...

Are there many packages that are orphaned, and have a better "half" much like bootstrap? Is there a listing, or directory of "recommended" packages (other than the packages downloaded with the initial R install)? Thanks, Neil Eastep. An "R" newbie ----------- Prof Brian Ripley <ripley at stats.ox.ac...

...;: no matching attribute value while deleting attribute on 'CN=DiscoverySearchMailbox {D919BA05-46A6-415f-80AD-7E09334BB852},CN=Users,DC=test,DC=rls,DC=ad' Fixed missing GUID on attribute authOrig Checked 319 objects (1 errors) # samba-tool dbcheck --cross-ncs Checking 7717 objects ERROR: orphaned backlink attribute 'msExchOWATranscodingMimeTypesBL' in CN=Default,CN=OWA Mailbox Policies,CN=rls,CN=Microsoft Exchange,CN=Services,CN=Configuration,DC=test,DC=rls,DC=ad for link msExchOWATranscodingMimeTypes in CN=Default,CN=OWA Mailbox Policies,CN=rls,CN=Microsoft Exchange,CN=Services,C...

The CRAN policy page (https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/policies.html) implies that there is a formal procedure for orphaning a package but none is mentioned in the Extensions manual (https://cran.r-project.org/doc/manuals/r-devel/R-exts.html). This page (https://cran.r-project.org/src/contrib/Orphaned/README) implies that one would simply resubmit the package to CRAN with the text "ORPHANED" in the `Maintai...

We''ve been seeing warnings coming out of the orphan commit stuff forever from ceph. Turns out it''s because we''re racing with checking if the orphan block reserve is set, because we clear it outside of the spin_lock. So leave the normal fastpath checks where they are, but take the spin_lock and _recheck_ to make sure we haven'...

In fixing how we deal with bad inodes, we had a regression in the orphan cleanup code, since it expects to get a bad inode back. So fix it to deal with getting -ESTALE back by deleting the orphan item manually and moving on. Thanks, Reported-by: Simon Kirby <sim@hostway.ca> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com> --- fs/btrfs/inode.c | 36 +++++++...

I noticed while running xfstests 83 that if we didn''t have enough space to delete our inode the orphan cleanup would just loop. This is because it keeps finding the same orphan item and keeps trying to kill it but can''t because we don''t get an error back from iput for deleting the inode. So keep track of the last guy we tried to kill, if it''s the same as the one we'&...