search for: orneri

On Tue, 10 Jul 2007, Scott Michel wrote: >> The idea is to review the atomic_ops model, and if it makes sense, just >> reuse it. (e.g., atomic_ops seems to have (basic?) support for Alpha). > > atomic_ops may have interesting ideas on how Chandler might proceed and > implement, but using its code is very unlikely. I think that Torvald's point here is that the

Torvald Riegel wrote: > First of all, I know LL/SC. Did I say it's equivalent to get-and-set? No. > So what are you trying to say, why is the paragraph in the proposal? You > seem to be speculating about architectures in general in one paragraph. > IMHO, I wouldn't try that, because I would have to be either imprecise or > don't state anything new. I was rebutting

...ation of an argument "close" to the declaration of said argument is lost. The closeness argument works best when the documentation for each argument is a terse half sentence, and in that sense roxygen encourages minimalist documentation. But the real issue with poor documentation is the orneriness of the writers: good documentation is hard work and most don't bother. For most R packages lines of code > lines of documentation > lines of test suite, usually by a factor of 10 at each stage. One of my goals for the survival package has been to make them more equal with 'lines...

Are the problems with yum in the Centos 4.3->>4.4 upgrade process due to a forked or obsolete version of yum? I briefly scanned <https://lists.dulug.duke.edu> and didn't see any problems, but did see some incidents regarding yum hangs reported about a year ago. regarding the current upgrade, Seth Vidal in

dear list! I KNOW this has been answered a million times before. But, as some might remember from their "freelance" times as a statistic consultant, sometimes you're blinded by the facts. I KNOW I have seen this problem solved, but due to the mental blockade i have been suffering from the last 3 hours, I can neither find the answer on the mailing list nor on google. I wrote a

Hi all, I have Splus and R both on my unix machine. I intend to keep only one of them. R looks to be a better choice. But I want to confirm. Is there any function or group of functions in Splus that are absent in R? Thanks, Saket. -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-help mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html Send