search for: orlitzky

Nothing to do with Dovecot, but I figured this is the best place to ask. Do any of the newer versions of Outlook have proper identities support like Thunderbird, mutt, Roundcube, i.e. every other mail client on Earth? We have customers who set up ten different mailboxes for one person because otherwise Outlook won't Do the Right Thing. Is there some way to make it behave like the others? *

On 03/03/2015 11:03 PM, Earl Killian wrote: > On 2015/3/2 10:03, Reindl Harald wrote: >> >> that is all nice >> >> but the main benefit of RBL's is always ignored: >> >> * centralized >> * no log parsing at all >> * honeypot data are "delivered" to any host >> * it's cheap >> * it's easy to maintain >> * it

Hi, next problem with outlook 2003 On the IMAP Server (dovecot.x86_64 1.0.7-7.el5) I created a certificate with "mkcert_dovecot.sh". Some entries as be written to "/etc/pki/dovecot/dovecot-openssl.cnf". plaintext paswords are disables. IMAP Serverport: 993 Server needs SSL Now the outlook 2003 clients meens "the server uses a security certificate, which could not be

On 03/04/2015 09:45 PM, Dave McGuire wrote: > On 03/04/2015 03:37 PM, Oliver Welter wrote: >> Am 04.03.2015 um 21:03 schrieb Dave McGuire: >>> Am 04.03.2015 um 20:12 schrieb Michael Orlitzky: >>>> Please add [DNSBL] support to iptables instead of Dovecot. It's a waste of >>>> effort to code it into every application that listens on the network. (FWIW, I agree that DNSBL hooks have no business being in kernel space. A standard *userland* DNSBL client commun...

Am 04.03.2015 um 21:03 schrieb Dave McGuire: > On 03/04/2015 02:12 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote: >>> I would like to reiterate Reindl Harald's point above, since subsequent >>> discussion has gotten away from it. If Dovecot had DNS RBL support >>> similar to Postfix, I think quite a few people would use it, and thereby >>> defeat the scanners far...

...800 Committer: Ben Hutchings <ben at decadent.org.uk> CommitDate: Sat, 28 Mar 2020 21:42:55 +0000 [klibc] dash: parser: Only accept single-digit parameter expansion outside of braces [ dash commit 7710a926b321879b84bf349b865b1dd4c52083f8 ] On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 01:39:52AM +0000, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > The POSIX spec says, > > The parameter name or symbol can be enclosed in braces, which are > optional except for positional parameters with more than one digit or > when parameter is a name and is followed by a character that could be > interpreted as part of the...

On 03/04/2015 02:12 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote: >> I would like to reiterate Reindl Harald's point above, since subsequent >> discussion has gotten away from it. If Dovecot had DNS RBL support >> similar to Postfix, I think quite a few people would use it, and thereby >> defeat the scanners far more effectively...

Am 04.03.2015 um 20:12 schrieb Michael Orlitzky: > On 03/03/2015 11:03 PM, Earl Killian wrote: >> On 2015/3/2 10:03, Reindl Harald wrote: >>> >>> that is all nice >>> >>> but the main benefit of RBL's is always ignored: >>> >>> * centralized >>> * no log parsing at all &...

On 4/10/19 6:39 AM, Dmitry Donskih via dovecot wrote: > `chmod -R 655 /etc/foobar/ssl' drops x attribute from `ssl' itself. > Use `chmod -R 755' or `chmod +x' or similar. > Your private keys should be... private. Use 750 instead.

There was some interest in Trojita (an IMAP client) on this list at one point. It looks like it's been seeing steady development again: http://jkt.flaska.net/blog/Trojita_v0_2_9__a_Qt_IMAP_e_mail_client.html

I've been having some problems with IMAP user connections to the Dovecot (v2.0.8) server. The following message is being logged. Jan 16 10:51:36 postal dovecot: master: Warning: service(imap-login): process_limit reached, client connections are being dropped The server is running Red Hat Enterprise Linux release 4 (update 6). Dovecot is v2.0.8. We have only 29 user accounts in

Lutz Schildt posted this to the Gentoo bugzilla recently: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=415571 There's a backtrace and conf files attached. I was able to find this possibly-related post from a while ago: http://dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2010-September/052963.html

Good morning. I already tried: 1. http://michael.orlitzky.com/articles/resizing_a_kvm_or_qemu_disk_image.php Result: OS system can't see the disk space sudo qemu-img resize /var/lib/libvirt/images/mysql-1.qcow2 +8G ls -lath /var/lib/libvirt/images/mysql-1.qcow2 -rw------- 1 libvirt-qemu kvm 10G jun 1 15:35 /var/lib/libvirt/images/mysql...

Hi, We have clients with various security & compliance requirements. Although not required, it would be ideal to have messages encrypted at rest. We already use SSL/TLS to secure the transmission of most email. However, it would be nice to have them encrypted sitting on our server. Is anyone doing this? I think that ideally, rather than full-disk encryption, we should use an encryption that