Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "orig_head".
Did you mean:
orig_eax
2013 Sep 24
1
imaptest-20130617 seems to be reporting spurious header changes
...ne 377:
client_state_error(client,
"%s: Header %s changed '%.*s' (len %d)
-> '%.*\
s' (len %d)",
msg->message_id, fetch_headers[i].name,
(int)orig_headers[j].value_len,
(const char *)orig_headers[j].value,
(int)orig_headers[j].value_len,
(int)fetch_headers[i].value_len,
(const char *)fetch_headers[i].value,...
2011 Aug 23
1
[LLVMdev] git Status
...rt if conversion work
> edit 443de Middle of if conversion work, something interesting to commit
It's not the best example: rebase is not needed at all to edit the last
commit. You should edit the first to make the example more relevant.
> git reset --soft HEAD^
> git commit -a -c ORIG_HEAD
That seems to be a rather complex and potentially dangerous way of
saying
git commit --amend
> git reset --mixed HEAD^
>
> Your files are left in the "untracked files"
... or "changed, but not staged for commit"
> state
> Now commit:
>
> git push llvm...
2011 Aug 22
0
[LLVMdev] git Status
FlyLanguage <flylanguage at gmail.com> writes:
> 2) Nobody writing up how git should be used with the current llvm
> workflow (which is not going to adapt to an SCM, but the other way
> around, which is understandable.)
Here is a first cut at that. Other git users, please chime in with
suggestions, edits, etc. Non-git users, please ask for clarification
where needed. This is
2011 Aug 19
11
[LLVMdev] git Status
> On Aug 18, 2011, at 10:57 AM, David Greene wrote:
>>
>> Did the project ever come to a decision about making a transition to
>> git? I'm trying to do some longer-term planning and it would be helpful
>> to know what the roadmap is.
It's stuck on:
1) A misunderstanding that global revision numbers are necessary and
that 'git describe' along with