search for: org&d

I understand that keeping this within one company is easiest from an organization perspective, so if Fangrui and Mehdi (and other Googlers) are able to take this on, that’s great. If not, I can raise this internally at Facebook. An estimate of the total costs incurred would be helpful for that, e.g. you mentioned Sendgrid being a couple of hundred dollars a month. Than...

...and needs to be revived, there’s updates to Phabricator itself, there’s keeping the server updated, and probably a bunch of other work I’m not thinking of. About how much of a time commitment would keeping Phabricator going be, in your estimation? From: llvm-dev <llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org> on behalf of Manuel Klimek via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> Reply-To: Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> Date: Monday, June 22, 2020 at 1:21 PM To: Zachary Turner <zturner at roblox.com> Cc: LLVM Dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>, cfe-dev <cfe-dev at lists.l...

...R: it is actually impossible to make a comment on lines in a PR that aren’t changed as part of the PR (eg surrounding code). See https://github.com/isaacs/github/issues/284 which has been open a very long time On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 1:13 AM Manuel Klimek via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Mehdi, Fangrui: are you willing to take on maintenance? > > Otherwise, Shoaib, the cost is currently: > ~$300-350 / mo for sendgrid (300-350k emails / month) > ~$2k / mo for cloud (we currently run on 1 machine O.O, plus storage & > backup) > > If y'all...

...sn't, so we can get some consensus on what > the diff is. > Indeed, I'll try to start a doc on this. > > On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 1:21 AM Shoaib Meenai <smeenai at fb.com> wrote: > >> I understand that keeping this within one company is easiest from an >> organization perspective, so if Fangrui and Mehdi (and other Googlers) are >> able to take this on, that’s great. If not, I can raise this internally at >> Facebook. An estimate of the total costs incurred would be helpful for >> that, e.g. you mentioned Sendgrid being a couple of hun...

Also note that this can lead to people not being able to load the package if the set of .Call entry points has changed between the old and new versions of the package. We strongly suspect that this is what happened to this Bioconductor user: https://support.bioconductor.org/p/121228/ Note that she's installing the binary and in this case no warning is issued. All we see is: package ?S4Vectors? successfully unpacked and MD5 sums checked but the old DLL apparently didn't get replaced with the new one. Hence the error: "make_RAW_from_NA_LLINT"...

On Sat, Jun 20, 2020 at 1:45 AM Zachary Turner via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > There’s also some feature regressions in GH vs Phab. > > You *must* initiate a review via a pull request, and pull request by > definition compares your working copy against master. > > This is not very compatible with LLVMs approach to incremental > development....

...I tried setting options(warn=2) but for some reason I still get a warning. I believe that is a bug in install.packages -- if I specify options(warn=2) it should convert that warning to an error (but it currently does not). Toby On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 4:50 PM Pages, Herve <hpages at fredhutch.org> wrote: > Also note that this can lead to people not being able to load the > package if the set of .Call entry points has changed between the old > and new versions of the package. We strongly suspect that this is what > happened to this Bioconductor user: > > https://supp...

...students how to do that) BTW I tried to disable staged installation, and the issue still happens: th798 at cmp2986 MINGW64 ~/projects/max-generalized-auc (master) $ R_INSTALL_STAGED=FALSE R --vanilla -e ".libPaths('~/R/library');.libPaths();options(repos=' https://cloud.r-project.org', warn=2);library(penaltyLearning);install.packages('penaltyLearning', type='source');getOption('warn');sessionInfo()" R version 3.6.0 (2019-04-26) -- "Planting of a Tree" Copyright (C) 2019 The R Foundation for Statistical Computing Platform: x86_64-w64-...

On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 9:25 PM David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 8:15 PM Mehdi AMINI via cfe-dev > <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 2:33 AM Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> wrote: > >> > >> On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 10:04 PM Mehdi AMINI via cfe-dev < > cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >>> > >>&gt...

You're definitely missing bits of texlive. Lots of "missing file: mf" in your debug logs. I think you need to start with installing texlive-metafont. Alternately, there are pre-built R 3.6.2 packages for EL-7 here: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1421894 I cannot push them as official updates to EPEL because of the catch-22 created by R's dependency on newer C++ support than the EL-7 gcc has. My packages use the devtoolset compiler to work around this need, but then R assumes it can build modules from CRAN with t...

...ould people be okay with that, or should we limit upgrades to just shortly after a branch? From: <ldionne at apple.com> on behalf of Louis Dionne <ldionne at apple.com> Date: Thursday, April 2, 2020 at 7:20 AM To: Shoaib Meenai <smeenai at fb.com> Cc: "llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>, Chris Bieneman <beanz at apple.com>, Petr Hosek <phosek at chromium.org>, Saleem Abdulrasool <compnerd at compnerd.org>, "tstellar at redhat.com" <tstellar at redhat.com> Subject: Re: Upgrading LLVM's minimum required C...

...only upgrade CMake versions when it’s absolutely necessary to do so” would be pretty harmful for the health of the build system. From: Nikita Popov <nikita.ppv at gmail.com> Date: Thursday, March 26, 2020 at 1:48 PM To: Shoaib Meenai <smeenai at fb.com> Cc: "llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] Upgrading LLVM's minimum required CMake version On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 9:07 PM Shoaib Meenai via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org<mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote: We had this discussion a few months ago...

...But again, I don't recall where I got that impression from. It may have been a bad assumption on my part. Tom. From: Anton Korobeynikov <anton at korobeynikov.info> Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2020 12:36 PM To: Tom Honermann <thonerma at synopsys.com> Cc: llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org; Michael Price <mprice at synopsys.com>; Tim Prince <trprince at synopsys.com>; Christopher Lapkowski <lapkow at synopsys.com> Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] Status of the git.llvm.org git repos Hello These repos were populated from SVN. Noone worked on migration of them to be pulled fr...

...v2 and GPLv2+ and LGPLv2+ and LPPL and MIT and Public Domain and UCD and Utopia Signature : RSA/SHA256, Mon 12 Nov 2018 09:22:43 AM CST, Key ID 24c6a8a7f4a80eb5 Source RPM : texlive-2012-43.20130427_r30134.el7.src.rpm Build Date : Tue 30 Oct 2018 04:08:55 PM CDT Build Host : x86-01.bsys.centos.org Relocations : (not relocatable) Packager : CentOS BuildSystem <http://bugs.centos.org> Vendor : CentOS URL : http://tug.org/texlive/ Summary : Binaries for latex-bin Description : Binaries for latex-bin I'm not sure I see any significant different between my output an...

...ce, and use some technology to make it as rich and useful as possible. Since we are not in the business of reinventing web technologies, I think we should use one of the preexisting flask frameworks for this. I have experimented with two: Eve + eve-sqlalchmey and flask-RESTful. http://python-eve.org <http://python-eve.org/> https://flask-restful.readthedocs.org/en/0.3.3/ <https://flask-restful.readthedocs.org/en/0.3.3/> If anyone in the community has some ideas on this I’d love to hear them. Thus far, I hacked on Eve for an afternoon and could not get it to understand LNTs (admit...

Is there any information iI can grab on implementing MFA via the samba 4 AD? Perhaps via the Okta API or SAML? JD

...ependencies of any size. Those who lived through that time remember it as the dark-ages of long ago, never to be seen again. Neil Nelson On 4/4/20 11:48 AM, Mehdi AMINI via llvm-dev wrote: > > > On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 10:49 AM Shoaib Meenai via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote: > > I’m in favor of all this. Thanks for volunteering! I’m happy to > help out in whatever way. > > Some things it might be worth figuring out for future upgrades: > > * If we want to limit ourselves to CMake...

...it is actually necessary, but we’ve beaten that dead horse long enough) I agree with Neil’s interpretation that the definition of “supported” being used here is default system packages and not third party repos that claim to work for that system. From: llvm-dev <llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org> On Behalf Of Mehdi AMINI via llvm-dev Sent: Saturday, April 4, 2020 2:11 PM To: Neil Nelson <nnelson at infowest.com> Cc: llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> Subject: [EXT] Re: [llvm-dev] Upgrading LLVM's minimum required CMake version On Sat, Apr 4, 2020 at 12:48 PM Neil N...

I don't think we support mingw.org as host since it lacks C++ 11 atomics. They may be leftover #ifdefs in the code which could be cleaned up. As a target mingw.org toolchain itself is still quite popular. The mingw.org-specific code are just few lines locating the lib directory and adding an include path so we gain almost nothing b...

...be built with the current release candidate of CMake. That doesn’t mean that we should. From: Mehdi AMINI <joker.eph at gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, April 7, 2020 12:01 AM To: Chris Tetreault <ctetreau at quicinc.com> Cc: Neil Nelson <nnelson at infowest.com>; llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org Subject: [EXT] Re: [llvm-dev] Upgrading LLVM's minimum required CMake version On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 12:48 PM Chris Tetreault <ctetreau at quicinc.com<mailto:ctetreau at quicinc.com>> wrote: Every additional dependency that we force the user to manually install (either by buildin...