search for: orc_developer

On Sep 29, 2008, at 2:52 PM, ORC_developer wrote: > Hi. > I successfully build llvm backend2.3 for sparc/solaris, but failed > to build LLVM front end of Sparc/Solaris. > > I’m wondering if there is any option I can use with X-86 version of > llvm-gcc front end to generate .bc file for sparc backend. Suppose >...

Hi. I successfully build llvm backend2.3 for sparc/solaris, but failed to build LLVM front end of Sparc/Solaris. I'm wondering if there is any option I can use with X-86 version of llvm-gcc front end to generate .bc file for sparc backend. Suppose I have the include files. Thanks. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Thanks. I wonder if we could use .bc file generated by X-86 llvm-gcc to feed SPARC llvm in some cases. -----Original Message----- From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of Nathan Keynes Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 5:18 AM To: LLVM Developers Mailing List Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Compile llvm-gcc-4.2 on sparc-sun-solaris2.10 On 20/06/2008, at 3:22

On 20/06/2008, at 3:22 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: > > On Jun 16, 2008, at 2:12 PM, heguojin at ict.ac.cn wrote: > >> Has anyone succeded ? > > This sounds like the sparc backed doesn't have inline asm support, > which isn't a surprise. I'd suggest disabling bootstrapping. That was going to be my guess (PR1557 I think it is). If I get some spare cycles in the

Hi, I'm new to LLVM. I need a confirmation about a little understanding about the LLVM When we use llvm-gcc without using -C, llvm tools and optimizations are not used at all. By the way, Does llvmc works on the bitcode format? Therefore, all optimizations of LLVM is on bitcode format described in LLVM Language Reference Manual ? Thanks for clarification.