search for: opuscomment

...he right set of changes, with metrics handled too. The distro packaged version I've got didn't have it, and I'd found kfish's github rather than the Xiph git. >> Another thought, could vorbiscomment do with having Opus comment support >> added? > > > Or make an opuscomment for opus-tools. I'm not sure which is the better > approach, though the latter certainly seems like it would be less surprising > for users. It'd certainly make sense for it to be included with other Opus tools, vorbiscomment is a bit of an oddity within vorbis-tools since (hazily re...

It seems there still isn't a tool (at least not a Xiph one) for modifying Opus comments from the command line. I've had a go at adding support in liboggz (which is fairly trivial, since it just means adding recognition for the Opus stream). That certainly works for comment editing, but I'm not sure if it's is good enough to commit back, because timing gets reported back slightly

It seems there still isn't a tool (at least not a Xiph one) for modifying Opus comments from the command line. I've had a go at adding support in liboggz (which is fairly trivial, since it just means adding recognition for the Opus stream). That certainly works for comment editing, but I'm not sure if it's is good enough to commit back, because timing gets reported back slightly

...p=liboggz.git;a=commitdiff;h=0a523700afbb>. I'm not sure there's been a release since then, though. Are you looking at the latest git, or is there something wrong with that implementation? > Another thought, could vorbiscomment do with having Opus comment support added? Or make an opuscomment for opus-tools. I'm not sure which is the better approach, though the latter certainly seems like it would be less surprising for users.

Ian Malone wrote: >>> Another thought, could vorbiscomment do with having Opus comment support >>> added? >> >> >> Or make an opuscomment for opus-tools. I'm not sure which is the better >> approach, though the latter certainly seems like it would be less surprising >> for users. > > It'd certainly make sense for it to be included with other Opus tools, > vorbiscomment is a bit of an oddity within vorbis-...

On 31 December 2016 at 21:04, Mark Harris <mark.hsj at gmail.com> wrote: > Ian Malone wrote: >>>> Another thought, could vorbiscomment do with having Opus comment support >>>> added? >>> >>> >>> Or make an opuscomment for opus-tools. I'm not sure which is the better >>> approach, though the latter certainly seems like it would be less surprising >>> for users. >> >> It'd certainly make sense for it to be included with other Opus tools, >> vorbiscomment is a bit of an o...