search for: opus_multistream_decode_

...mvalin at jmvalin.ca> wrote: > On 11/23/2017 01:28 PM, Drew Allen wrote: > > To your first point, I was only trying to copy how _multistream_'s c > > files function in this way, possibly that's worth refactoring as well > > (as a separate patch). > > Well, the opus_multistream_decode_* calls were correct before your > patch. It's only the encode ones that have the issues (should be > addressed separately). > > Jean-Marc > > > On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 9:02 AM Jean-Marc Valin <jmvalin at jmvalin.ca > > <mailto:jmvalin at jmvalin.ca>&g...

...01:28 PM, Drew Allen wrote: > > > To your first point, I was only trying to copy how _multistream_'s > c > > > files function in this way, possibly that's worth refactoring as > well > > > (as a separate patch). > > > > Well, the opus_multistream_decode_* calls were correct before your > > patch. It's only the encode ones that have the issues (should be > > addressed separately). > > > > Jean-Marc > > > > > On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 9:02 AM Jean-Marc Valin > > <jmvalin at...

Hey Jean-Marc, Thanks again! To your first point, I was only trying to copy how _multistream_'s c files function in this way, possibly that's worth refactoring as well (as a separate patch). I made the other changes you suggested. Cheers, Drew On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 9:02 AM Jean-Marc Valin <jmvalin at jmvalin.ca> wrote: > On 11/22/2017 06:23 PM, Drew Allen wrote: >

...r first point, I was only trying to copy how > > _multistream_'s c > > > > files function in this way, possibly that's worth > > refactoring as well > > > > (as a separate patch). > > > > > > Well, the opus_multistream_decode_* calls were correct before > your > > > patch. It's only the encode ones that have the issues (should > be > > > addressed separately). > > > > > > Jean-Marc > > > > > > > On Thu, Nov...

...r first point, I was only trying to copy how > > _multistream_'s c > > > > files function in this way, possibly that's worth > > refactoring as well > > > > (as a separate patch). > > > > > > Well, the opus_multistream_decode_* calls were correct before > your > > > patch. It's only the encode ones that have the issues (should > be > > > addressed separately). > > > > > > Jean-Marc > > > > > > > On Thu, Nov...

On 11/23/2017 01:28 PM, Drew Allen wrote: > To your first point, I was only trying to copy how _multistream_'s c > files function in this way, possibly that's worth refactoring as well > (as a separate patch). Well, the opus_multistream_decode_* calls were correct before your patch. It's only the encode ones that have the issues (should be addressed separately). Jean-Marc > On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 9:02 AM Jean-Marc Valin <jmvalin at jmvalin.ca > <mailto:jmvalin at jmvalin.ca>> wrote: > > On 11/22/2017 0...

...rote: > > On 11/23/2017 01:28 PM, Drew Allen wrote: > > To your first point, I was only trying to copy how _multistream_'s c > > files function in this way, possibly that's worth refactoring as well > > (as a separate patch). > > Well, the opus_multistream_decode_* calls were correct before your > patch. It's only the encode ones that have the issues (should be > addressed separately). > >         Jean-Marc > > > On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 9:02 AM Jean-Marc Valin > <jmvalin at jmvalin.ca <mailto:jmvalin at...

...> >     > To your first point, I was only trying to copy how > _multistream_'s c > >     > files function in this way, possibly that's worth > refactoring as well > >     > (as a separate patch). > > > >     Well, the opus_multistream_decode_* calls were correct before your > >     patch. It's only the encode ones that have the issues (should be > >     addressed separately). > > > >             Jean-Marc > > > >     > On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 9:02 AM Jean-Marc Valin >...

...; >     _multistream_'s c > >     >     > files function in this way, possibly that's worth > >     refactoring as well > >     >     > (as a separate patch). > >     > > >     >     Well, the opus_multistream_decode_* calls were > correct before your > >     >     patch. It's only the encode ones that have the > issues (should be > >     >     addressed separately). > >     > > >     >             Jean-Marc >...

...y trying to copy how >> > _multistream_'s c >> > > > files function in this way, possibly that's worth >> > refactoring as well >> > > > (as a separate patch). >> > > >> > > Well, the opus_multistream_decode_* calls were correct before >> your >> > > patch. It's only the encode ones that have the issues (should >> be >> > > addressed separately). >> > > >> > > Jean-Marc >> > > >> &gt...

...y trying to copy how > >     _multistream_'s c > >     >     > files function in this way, possibly that's worth > >     refactoring as well > >     >     > (as a separate patch). > >     > > >     >     Well, the opus_multistream_decode_* calls were correct > before your > >     >     patch. It's only the encode ones that have the issues > (should be > >     >     addressed separately). > >     > > >     >             Jean-Marc > >     > > &gt...

...stream_'s c > > > > > files function in this way, possibly that's worth > > > refactoring as well > > > > > (as a separate patch). > > > > > > > > Well, the opus_multistream_decode_* calls were > > correct before your > > > > patch. It's only the encode ones that have the > > issues (should be > > > > addressed separately). > > > > > > > >...

...         >     >     > files function in this way, possibly that's > worth > >         >     refactoring as well > >         >     >     > (as a separate patch). > >         >     > > >         >     >     Well, the opus_multistream_decode_* calls were > >         correct before your > >         >     >     patch. It's only the encode ones that have the > >         issues (should be > >         >     >     addressed separately). > >         >     > > > ...

...t; > files function in this way, possibly that's >> worth >> > > refactoring as well >> > > > > (as a separate patch). >> > > > >> > > > Well, the opus_multistream_decode_* calls were >> > correct before your >> > > > patch. It's only the encode ones that have the >> > issues (should be >> > > > addressed separately). >> > >...

...>>>     worth > >>>     >         >     refactoring as well > >>>     >         >     >     > (as a separate patch). > >>>     >         >     > > >>>     >         >     >     Well, the opus_multistream_decode_* > calls were > >>>     >         correct before your > >>>     >         >     >     patch. It's only the encode ones that > have the > >>>     >         issues (should be > >>>     >         > ...