Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "opus010".
Did you mean:
opus001
2017 Nov 16
2
Opus vs AAC (endurance test)
...22.5646dB
RMS diff: -39.0425dB
Mean diff: -38.7372dB
Opus @482kbps is much better than AAC @288kbps.
now let's see what happens after 10 passes
Comparing 000.wav - aac010.wav...
Max diff: -16.1286dB
RMS diff: -32.3361dB
Mean diff: -31.715dB
AAC stepped back just a little
Comparing 000.wav - opus010.wav...
Max diff: -7.61385dB
RMS diff: -20.3666dB
Mean diff: -20.1286dB
Opus made complete disaster, but HF looks
good (so it isn't an error in frames
synchronisation of wavdiff program).
And no, i'm not going to do ABX test at high
bitrates because i'm not wavdiff.exe, and i'm
not...
2017 Nov 16
0
Opus vs AAC (endurance test)
...;
> Opus @482kbps is much better than AAC @288kbps.
> now let's see what happens after 10 passes
>
> Comparing 000.wav - aac010.wav...
> Max diff: -16.1286dB
> RMS diff: -32.3361dB
> Mean diff: -31.715dB
>
> AAC stepped back just a little
>
> Comparing 000.wav - opus010.wav...
> Max diff: -7.61385dB
> RMS diff: -20.3666dB
> Mean diff: -20.1286dB
>
> Opus made complete disaster, but HF looks
> good (so it isn't an error in frames
> synchronisation of wavdiff program).
>
> And no, i'm not going to do ABX test at high
> bitrates...