Displaying 10 results from an estimated 10 matches for "optimziations".
Did you mean:
optimizations
2010 Oct 11
1
[LLVMdev] Invoking LLVM front-end
...;> Hello LLVMers,
>>
>> I am developing hardware generation tool which converts C/C++ application to
>> hardware which is not a Pass but a separate project. I am going to use LLVM
>> as front-end optimization tool. I am curious how I can invoke the LLVM
>> front-end optimziations and then, get the pointer of LLVM IR data generated
>> by the front-end. I would like to perform some optimziations on the IR. Can
>> anybody please direct me to some example codes or documentation about that?
>>
>> Thank you.
>> _______________________________________...
2010 Oct 11
0
[LLVMdev] Invoking LLVM front-end
Hello LLVMers,
I am developing hardware generation tool which converts C/C++ application to
hardware which is not a Pass but a separate project. I am going to use LLVM
as front-end optimization tool. I am curious how I can invoke the LLVM
front-end optimziations and then, get the pointer of LLVM IR data generated
by the front-end. I would like to perform some optimziations on the IR. Can
anybody please direct me to some example codes or documentation about that?
Thank you.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <...
2016 Dec 22
2
struct bitfield regression between 3.6 and 3.9 (using -O0)
Here's our testcase:
#include <stdio.h>
struct flags {
unsigned frog: 1;
unsigned foo : 1;
unsigned bar : 1;
unsigned bat : 1;
unsigned baz : 1;
unsigned bam : 1;
};
int main() {
struct flags flags;
flags.bar = 1;
flags.foo = 1;
if (flags.foo == 1) {
printf("Pass\n");
return 0;
} else {
2016 Dec 22
0
struct bitfield regression between 3.6 and 3.9 (using -O0)
On 12/21/2016 4:45 PM, Phil Tomson via llvm-dev wrote:
> Here's our testcase:
>
> #include <stdio.h>
>
> struct flags {
> unsigned frog: 1;
> unsigned foo : 1;
> unsigned bar : 1;
> unsigned bat : 1;
> unsigned baz : 1;
> unsigned bam : 1;
> };
>
> int main() {
> struct flags flags;
> flags.bar = 1;
>
2008 Dec 24
1
Non-finite finite difference error
Hello, I'm trying to use fitdistr() from the MASS package to fit a gamma
distribution to a set of data. The data set is too large (1167 values) to
reproduce in an email, but the summary statistics are:
Min. 1st Qu. Median Mean 3rd Qu. Max.
116.7 266.7 666.7 1348.0 1642.0 16720.0
The call I'm trying to make is:
fitdistr(x,"gamma")
and the error is:
Error in optim(x =
2016 Dec 23
2
struct bitfield regression between 3.6 and 3.9 (using -O0)
Given that this is compiled with -O0, would there a way to skip the
Optimization of the Type-legalized selection DAG? It's fine until it
optimizes the Type-legalized selection DAG into the Optimized
Type-legalized selection DAG.
Phil
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 10:29 AM, Friedman, Eli <efriedma at codeaurora.org>
wrote:
> On 12/21/2016 4:45 PM, Phil Tomson via llvm-dev wrote:
>
>
2018 Sep 13
2
Loop Distribution pass
Jonas/Renato,
>I think it's mostly about the success rate, given it's too conservative. But in the past 2 years, improvements in (and around) the LV have been slowed down a bit due to the move >to VPlan.
It wasn't our intention to slow down LV improvements, but if the project ended up causing other developers take the stance of wait-and-see, that's an inevitable side effect
2006 Dec 01
2
[LLVMdev] Changing pointer representation?
Having finally found some time to work on this project, I'm currently
looking at mechanisms of augmenting LLVM to catch out-of-bounds pointer
references.
For a variety of reasons, I don't think the approach taken by the
Safecode project is appropriate for mine -- particularly, I have no
requirement to interface to external code (all code in the system will
either be compiled using
2018 Sep 13
4
Loop Distribution pass
Hi,
I found with the help of the optimization remarks a loop that could not
be vectorized, but if loop distribution was enabled this may happen,
which it in fact did with a very significant benchmark improvement (~25%).
I tried (on SystemZ) to enable this pass, and found that it only
affected a handful of files on SPEC. This means I could enable this
without worrying about any regressions on
2007 Apr 18
33
LZO compression?
Hi,
I don''t know if this has been discussed before, but have you thought
about adding LZO compression to ZFS?
One zfs-fuse user has provided a patch which implements LZO compression,
and he claims better compression ratios *and* better speed than lzjb.
The miniLZO library is licensed under the GPL, but the author
specifically says that other licenses are available by request.
Has this