Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "optimiztions".
Did you mean:
optimizations
2004 May 14
2
[LLVMdev] Can I disable the optimizaiton for llvmgcc?
Hi all LLVMor,
I just tried to compile a simple code and analyze the number of the basic blocks. But after compile, what I got, the bytecode is seems to be optimized bytecode. So the information of basic blocks is not what I expected. I want ot use the code as example to see how some of code optimization methods work. However, after compiling file using llvm test.c -o test, bytecode file
2008 Sep 16
3
[LLVMdev] Specifying Additional Compilation Passes to lli
...d you correctly, the design you have in mind is
> > to: create a PassManager, pass it to the JIT on construction, and
> > modify runJITOnFunction to run the second PassManager on the
> > Function being jit'd before running the codegen PassManager.
> Thanks.
>
> Optimiztions should be done before JIT, right? Why not run the
> optimizations (using the second PM) on the function that's scheduled
>
> for JIT before? Perhaps I am not understanding what you are trying to
>
> do.
>
> Evan
Evan,
My goal is to support dynamic optimizations....
2008 Sep 16
1
[LLVMdev] Specifying Additional Compilation Passes to lli
Evan,
So, if I understand you correctly, the design you have in mind is to: create a PassManager, pass it to the JIT on construction, and modify runJITOnFunction to run the second PassManager on the Function being jit'd before running the codegen PassManager. Thanks.
Tom
----- Original Message -----
From: "Evan Cheng" <evan.cheng at apple.com>
To: "LLVM Developers Mailing
2008 Sep 17
0
[LLVMdev] Specifying Additional Compilation Passes to lli
...y, the design you have in mind is
>>> to: create a PassManager, pass it to the JIT on construction, and
>>> modify runJITOnFunction to run the second PassManager on the
>>> Function being jit'd before running the codegen PassManager.
>> Thanks.
>>
>> Optimiztions should be done before JIT, right? Why not run the
>> optimizations (using the second PM) on the function that's scheduled
>>
>> for JIT before? Perhaps I am not understanding what you are trying to
>>
>> do.
>>
>> Evan
>
> Evan,
> My goal is...