search for: optimiztions

Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "optimiztions".

Did you mean: optimizations
2004 May 14
2
[LLVMdev] Can I disable the optimizaiton for llvmgcc?
Hi all LLVMor, I just tried to compile a simple code and analyze the number of the basic blocks. But after compile, what I got, the bytecode is seems to be optimized bytecode. So the information of basic blocks is not what I expected. I want ot use the code as example to see how some of code optimization methods work. However, after compiling file using llvm test.c -o test, bytecode file
2008 Sep 16
3
[LLVMdev] Specifying Additional Compilation Passes to lli
...d you correctly, the design you have in mind is > > to: create a PassManager, pass it to the JIT on construction, and > > modify runJITOnFunction to run the second PassManager on the > > Function being jit'd before running the codegen PassManager. > Thanks. > > Optimiztions should be done before JIT, right? Why not run the > optimizations (using the second PM) on the function that's scheduled > > for JIT before? Perhaps I am not understanding what you are trying to > > do. > > Evan Evan, My goal is to support dynamic optimizations....
2008 Sep 16
1
[LLVMdev] Specifying Additional Compilation Passes to lli
Evan, So, if I understand you correctly, the design you have in mind is to: create a PassManager, pass it to the JIT on construction, and modify runJITOnFunction to run the second PassManager on the Function being jit'd before running the codegen PassManager. Thanks. Tom ----- Original Message ----- From: "Evan Cheng" <evan.cheng at apple.com> To: "LLVM Developers Mailing
2008 Sep 17
0
[LLVMdev] Specifying Additional Compilation Passes to lli
...y, the design you have in mind is >>> to: create a PassManager, pass it to the JIT on construction, and >>> modify runJITOnFunction to run the second PassManager on the >>> Function being jit'd before running the codegen PassManager. >> Thanks. >> >> Optimiztions should be done before JIT, right? Why not run the >> optimizations (using the second PM) on the function that's scheduled >> >> for JIT before? Perhaps I am not understanding what you are trying to >> >> do. >> >> Evan > > Evan, > My goal is...