Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "optimiziations".
Did you mean:
optimizations
2007 Nov 05
1
FLAC for VisualDSP
...lac encoding and decoding algorithm on the
VisualDSP platform.
Do you know if it's already existing a flac version for that?
I'm trying to estimate the computational cost of FLAClib on blackfin. Do you
know some profiling information for blackfin?
I saw the assembler code for CPU dependent optimiziations. Is there
something similar for blackfin?
I couldn't find it.
Thank you so much,
Matteo Montani
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/flac-dev/attachments/20071105/eb71368c/attachment.html
2005 Apr 14
1
[LLVMdev] Variables and/or identifiers?
I am having trouble understanding the relationship between LLVM
identifiers, stack (alloca) and variables. In particular, when I need
to create a variable, what should I use? For instance, consider the
following C-like language snippet:
int f()
{
int i = rand();
if(i > 5)
i = 1;
return i;
}
Ignoring optimizations, what should I use to represent 'i'? Online
demo gives the following
2011 Feb 21
0
[LLVMdev] llvm.gcroot suggestion
Hi Talin,
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 5:50 PM, Talin <viridia at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> In the current scheme, the way you tell LLVM that a root is no longer
> needed is by assigning NULL to it. However, that assumes that all roots are
> pointers, which is not true in my world - a root can be a struct containing
> pointers inside of it. (In my current frontend, a non-pointer
2011 Feb 18
2
[LLVMdev] llvm.gcroot suggestion
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 1:05 AM, nicolas geoffray <
nicolas.geoffray at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Talin,
>
> On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 1:36 AM, Talin <viridia at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Thinking about it even more, here's a short summary of what I would
>> propose:
>>
>> - *llvm.gc.value*(value, metadata) - marks an SSA value as a garbage
2011 Mar 05
2
[LLVMdev] llvm.gcroot suggestion
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 1:50 AM, nicolas geoffray <
nicolas.geoffray at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Talin,
>
> On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 5:50 PM, Talin <viridia at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> In the current scheme, the way you tell LLVM that a root is no longer
>> needed is by assigning NULL to it. However, that assumes that all roots are
>> pointers,
2015 Jul 27
15
[LLVMdev] Help with using LLVM to re-compile hot functions at run-time
Hi Again,
I'm a little confused regarding what is the exact Orc's functions I should
use
in order to save the functions code in a code cache so it could be later
replaced with different versions of it and I appreciate your help.
Just a reminder I want to dynamically recompile the program based on
profile
collected at the run-time. I would like to start executing the program
from
the