search for: optimiziations

Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "optimiziations".

Did you mean: optimizations
2007 Nov 05
1
FLAC for VisualDSP
...lac encoding and decoding algorithm on the VisualDSP platform. Do you know if it's already existing a flac version for that? I'm trying to estimate the computational cost of FLAClib on blackfin. Do you know some profiling information for blackfin? I saw the assembler code for CPU dependent optimiziations. Is there something similar for blackfin? I couldn't find it. Thank you so much, Matteo Montani -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/flac-dev/attachments/20071105/eb71368c/attachment.html
2005 Apr 14
1
[LLVMdev] Variables and/or identifiers?
I am having trouble understanding the relationship between LLVM identifiers, stack (alloca) and variables. In particular, when I need to create a variable, what should I use? For instance, consider the following C-like language snippet: int f() { int i = rand(); if(i > 5) i = 1; return i; } Ignoring optimizations, what should I use to represent 'i'? Online demo gives the following
2011 Feb 21
0
[LLVMdev] llvm.gcroot suggestion
Hi Talin, On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 5:50 PM, Talin <viridia at gmail.com> wrote: > > > In the current scheme, the way you tell LLVM that a root is no longer > needed is by assigning NULL to it. However, that assumes that all roots are > pointers, which is not true in my world - a root can be a struct containing > pointers inside of it. (In my current frontend, a non-pointer
2011 Feb 18
2
[LLVMdev] llvm.gcroot suggestion
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 1:05 AM, nicolas geoffray < nicolas.geoffray at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Talin, > > On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 1:36 AM, Talin <viridia at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Thinking about it even more, here's a short summary of what I would >> propose: >> >> - *llvm.gc.value*(value, metadata) - marks an SSA value as a garbage
2011 Mar 05
2
[LLVMdev] llvm.gcroot suggestion
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 1:50 AM, nicolas geoffray < nicolas.geoffray at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Talin, > > On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 5:50 PM, Talin <viridia at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> In the current scheme, the way you tell LLVM that a root is no longer >> needed is by assigning NULL to it. However, that assumes that all roots are >> pointers,
2015 Jul 27
15
[LLVMdev] Help with using LLVM to re-compile hot functions at run-time
Hi Again, I'm a little confused regarding what is the exact Orc's functions I should use in order to save the functions code in a code cache so it could be later replaced with different versions of it and I appreciate your help. Just a reminder I want to dynamically recompile the program based on profile collected at the run-time. I would like to start executing the program from the