Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "optiminz".
Did you mean:
optimiz
2006 Apr 18
1
[LLVMdev] OpenBSD. (Was: 1.7 Pre-Release Ready for Testing)
...the release yet.. or how do I apply a patch to it... thanks much for the update.. I'll feel better about the whole thing..OpenBSD is really nice with the pro-police stack and would like to see an alternative to the GCC only compiler chain of tools especially as it is based on a somewhat archaic optiminzation backend and procedural stuff is pretty dated in the RTL layer.. Aho and Ullman can only take you so far..
Then you need to use the FORCE.. LUKE use the force.. of llvm that is.
:) cheers all.
Jeff Cohen <jeffc at jolt-lang.org> wrote: I just added __OpenBSD__ everywhere __FreeBSD__ wa...
2006 Apr 17
0
[LLVMdev] OpenBSD. (Was: 1.7 Pre-Release Ready for Testing)
I just added __OpenBSD__ everywhere __FreeBSD__ was being tested (there
were about a dozen places). I suspect we'll have to add one for NetBSD
also one day (even DragonflyBSD?). INT8_MAX and friends ought to be
declared by <stdint.h>. It is on FreeBSD.
Ralph Corderoy wrote:
>Hi again,
>
>I wrote:
>
>
>>>I would like to test but the I modigied the
2006 Apr 17
3
[LLVMdev] OpenBSD. (Was: 1.7 Pre-Release Ready for Testing)
Hi again,
I wrote:
> > I would like to test but the I modigied the configure to make
> > unknown = OpenBSD and Unix
>
> Have you looked at ./config.log. ./configure creates this as it runs
> as a trace of the path it took through ./configure. Work backwards
> from the end to find out what it didn't like.
I remember SourceForge's compile farm has an OpenBSD x86