Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "optimaz".
Did you mean:
optimal
2013 Feb 06
4
PV or HVM guest for OpenBuildServices Host (OpenSUSE based)
...nt.
I thought about which guest type I should use. I am not that familiar with
for example compiler optimization algorithms and so I asked my self the
question would it be better to build up an PV or an HVM OpenSUSE DomU. What
would be better? Does it matter if it is a PV or HVM guest for compiler
optimazations and so on?
Would be great when someone could give me an answer.
Best Regards
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-users
2011 Jul 15
1
[LLVMdev] Pass Question
...into the LLVM optimizer so to insert functions for optimization before and after every function call.For example, I create a test file test.c. There is a function f1() just printing out "Print f1", which is called in the main function. That's all the test.c do. Now I want to
insert optimazation function opt_begin() before f1() and opt_end() after by adding the command line of my pass in the compilation option of llvm-gcc. Does anyone have any idea about how to implement this? I would really
appreciate if anyone can help me out, since I was stuck by this question for really a long...
2012 Jun 07
2
[LLVMdev] no differnce in the execution time between seq. and parallel programs
...have to send in your programs along with an explanation of how
> you compiled them exactly (exact sequence of commands) both for gcc and LLVM.
>
> Ciao, Duncan.
>
Hi Ciao
Thank you very much for your help and patience
I want to check with you the compilation steps witout turn on any optimazation
in both gcc and llvm :
Fft_x.c The first program before the transformation
Fft_dswp.c The second program after the transformation
In gcc compiler I used the following steps
--Before the transformation
gcc –Wall fft_x.c –o samp -lm
Time ./samp
0.544 the executi...
2012 Jun 06
0
[LLVMdev] no differnce in the execution time between seq. and parallel programs
> I would be happy if you give me an insight into what could have caused the
> difference.
No idea. Maybe you forgot to turn optimizations on when compiling? Otherwise
you are going to have to send in your programs along with an explanation of how
you compiled them exactly (exact sequence of commands) both for gcc and LLVM.
Ciao, Duncan.
2012 Jun 06
2
[LLVMdev] no differnce in the execution time between seq. and parallel programs
Duncan Sands <baldrick <at> free.fr> writes:
>
> Hi esraa,
>
> > i am using LLVM to execute two programs both of them was exactly
> > similar but the difference was the first one is a sequential program
> > has three functions. In the second program i am trying to execute it
> > by giving each function to thread (three thread work in parallel way)