Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "opt_nobarri".
Did you mean:
opt_nobarrier
2008 Jun 10
1
[PATCH, RFC] btrfs: allow scanning multiple devices during mount
...able/super.c 2008-06-10 10:47:47.000000000 +0200
@@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ static void btrfs_put_super (struct supe
}
enum {
- Opt_degraded, Opt_subvol, Opt_nodatasum, Opt_nodatacow,
+ Opt_degraded, Opt_subvol, Opt_device, Opt_nodatasum, Opt_nodatacow,
Opt_max_extent, Opt_max_inline, Opt_alloc_start, Opt_nobarrier,
Opt_ssd, Opt_err,
};
@@ -73,6 +73,7 @@ enum {
static match_table_t tokens = {
{Opt_degraded, "degraded"},
{Opt_subvol, "subvol=%s"},
+ {Opt_device, "device=%s"},
{Opt_nodatasum, "nodatasum"},
{Opt_nodatacow, "nodatacow"},
{Opt_nobar...
2009 Jan 24
2
[PATCH] btrfs: flushoncommit mount option
...((o) |= BTRFS_MOUNT_##opt)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/super.c b/fs/btrfs/super.c
index d8c664c..2b33a6a 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/super.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/super.c
@@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ enum {
Opt_degraded, Opt_subvol, Opt_device, Opt_nodatasum, Opt_nodatacow,
Opt_max_extent, Opt_max_inline, Opt_alloc_start, Opt_nobarrier,
Opt_ssd, Opt_thread_pool, Opt_noacl, Opt_compress, Opt_notreelog,
- Opt_err,
+ Opt_flushoncommit, Opt_err,
};
static match_table_t tokens = {
@@ -85,6 +85,7 @@ static match_table_t tokens = {
{Opt_ssd, "ssd"},
{Opt_noacl, "noacl"},
{Opt_notreelog, "notreelog...
2010 Oct 25
2
[PATCH] Btrfs: allow subvol deletion by unprivileged user with -o user_subvol_rm_allowed
...I(inode)->root;
-
mutex_lock(&inode->i_mutex);
err = d_invalidate(dentry);
if (err)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/super.c b/fs/btrfs/super.c
index 4da2680..8ff5a3a 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/super.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/super.c
@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ enum {
Opt_nodatacow, Opt_max_inline, Opt_alloc_start, Opt_nobarrier, Opt_ssd,
Opt_nossd, Opt_ssd_spread, Opt_thread_pool, Opt_noacl, Opt_compress,
Opt_compress_force, Opt_notreelog, Opt_ratio, Opt_flushoncommit,
- Opt_discard, Opt_err,
+ Opt_discard, Opt_user_subvol_rm_allowed, Opt_err,
};
static match_table_t tokens = {
@@ -92,6 +92,7 @@ static match_tab...
2010 Nov 08
89
Re: DM-CRYPT: Scale to multiple CPUs v3 on 2.6.37-rc* ?
On Sun, Nov 07 2010 at 6:05pm -0500,
Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 07, 2010 at 10:39:23PM +0100, Milan Broz wrote:
> > On 11/07/2010 08:45 PM, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > >> I read about barrier-problems and data getting to the partition when
> > >> using dm-crypt and several layers so I don''t know if that could be
> >