search for: opt3

...o.opt.bc // [llc -pre-RA-sched=list-burr foo.opt.bc] -> foo.s ** -Wa passes options to native as. $ mcc16 -c foo.c -Wa=opt1 // [clang-cc foo.c] -> foo.bc // [llvm-ld foo.bc] -> foo.opt.bc // [llc foo.opt.bc] -> foo.s // [native-as -opt1 foo.s] -> foo.o $ mcc16 -Wo=opt1 -Wl=opt2 -Wa=opt3 foo.c bar.c // [clang-cc foo.c] -> foo.bc // [clang-cc bar.c] -> bar.bc // [llvm-ld -opt1 foo.bc bar.bc] -> a.out.bc // [llc a.out.bc] -> a.out.s // [native-as -opt3 a.out.s] -> a.out.o // [native-ld -opt2 a.out.o] -> a.out Is this achievable by a tablegen based driver ? - Sanji...

...r9/tmp.o native-ld /tmp/llvm_6ibgr9/tmp.o -o a.out > 3. -Wo <options> - pass optimizations to the llvm-ld > 4. mcc16 -Wl <options> - pass options to native linker. > 5. mcc16 -Wa <options> - pass options to native assembler. $ mcc16 -dry-run -Wo,-opt1 -Wllc,-opt2 -Wa,-opt3 -Wl,-opt4 foo.c clang-cc foo.c -o /tmp/llvm_92HLCj/foo.bc llvm-ld -opt1 /tmp/llvm_92HLCj/foo.bc -o /tmp/llvm_92HLCj/tmp.bc llc -opt2 -f /tmp/llvm_92HLCj/tmp.bc -o /tmp/llvm_92HLCj/tmp.s native-as -opt3 /tmp/llvm_92HLCj/tmp.s -o /tmp/llvm_92HLCj/tmp.o native-ld -opt4 /tmp/llvm_92HLCj/tmp.o -o a....

Dear all, I have a function that predicts DV based on one predictor pred: pred<-c(0,3000000,7800000,15600000,23400000,131200000) DV<-c(0,500,1000,1400,1700,1900) ## I define Function 1 that computes the predicted value based on pred values and parameters a and b: calc_DV_pred <- function(a,b) { DV_pred <- rep(0,(length(pred))) for(i in 1:length(DV_pred)){ DV_pred[i] <- a *

...vm_6ibgr9/tmp.o -o a.out > > > 3. -Wo <options> - pass optimizations to the llvm-ld > > 4. mcc16 -Wl <options> - pass options to native linker. > > 5. mcc16 -Wa <options> - pass options to native assembler. > > $ mcc16 -dry-run -Wo,-opt1 -Wllc,-opt2 -Wa,-opt3 -Wl,-opt4 foo.c > clang-cc foo.c -o /tmp/llvm_92HLCj/foo.bc > llvm-ld -opt1 /tmp/llvm_92HLCj/foo.bc -o /tmp/llvm_92HLCj/tmp.bc > llc -opt2 -f /tmp/llvm_92HLCj/tmp.bc -o /tmp/llvm_92HLCj/tmp.s > native-as -opt3 /tmp/llvm_92HLCj/tmp.s -o /tmp/llvm_92HLCj/tmp.o > native-ld -opt4 /tmp/ll...

Hi Sanjiv, Sanjiv Gupta <sanjiv.gupta <at> microchip.com> writes: > > PIC16 now has clang and llc based system to generate native assembly. We > then use our native assembler (gpasm) and the native linker (mplink) to > generate the final executable. How can I integrate these things with > the driver llvmc to have gcc like user experience? Note that we also >

PIC16 now has clang and llc based system to generate native assembly. We then use our native assembler (gpasm) and the native linker (mplink) to generate the final executable. How can I integrate these things with the driver llvmc to have gcc like user experience? Note that we also want to run llvm-ld in order to perform the LTOs in case of multiple files. - Sanjiv

...to run for a given level of optimization. This will support FE languages that don't have a compiler that does its own optimization and depends on "opt" to do it. So, for example, lang.opt1=-simplifycfg -instcombine -mem2reg could be specified as well as lang.opt2, lang.opt3 ... 2. Allow the configuration file to specify that a given tool understands the *intent* of the -On options and simply provide -On to that tool as a command line option, rather than attempt to list the equivalent set of pass names as options. This way the tool (typically a transla...

Here is the first Perl script I've tried to write to run rsync. It seems to work, but I don't see the progress like I should. I apologize if it's sloppy, I should add that it's not only the first perl script I've written for rsync, it's the first perl script I've written at all. ___________________________ #!/usr/bin/perl -w print " This command will DELETE

On Sat, 14 Aug 2004, Reid Spencer wrote: > I'm at the point in developing llvmc (Compiler Driver) where I need to > get the details on the specific optimization arguments that the -O > family of options should (by default) issue to "opt". I'm soliciting > your feedback on this so I can start testing optimization. Hopefully you > can provide it by early this coming

Folks, I'm at the point in developing llvmc (Compiler Driver) where I need to get the details on the specific optimization arguments that the -O family of options should (by default) issue to "opt". I'm soliciting your feedback on this so I can start testing optimization. Hopefully you can provide it by early this coming week. For clarity, the -O options are currently defined

...ot;internal test function - do not use"; longdesc = "\ @@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ You probably don't want to call this function." }; { defaults with name = "internal_test_63_optargs"; style = RErr, [], [OInt "opt1"; OInt "opt2"; OInt "opt3"; OInt "opt4"; OInt "opt5"; OInt "opt6"; OInt "opt7"; OInt "opt8"; OInt "opt9"; OInt "opt10"; OInt "opt11"; OInt "opt12"; OInt "opt13"; OInt "opt14"; OInt "opt15"; OInt &quot...

...ot;internal test function - do not use"; longdesc = "\ @@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ You probably don't want to call this function." }; { defaults with name = "internal_test_63_optargs"; style = RErr, [], [OInt "opt1"; OInt "opt2"; OInt "opt3"; OInt "opt4"; OInt "opt5"; OInt "opt6"; OInt "opt7"; OInt "opt8"; OInt "opt9"; OInt "opt10"; OInt "opt11"; OInt "opt12"; OInt "opt13"; OInt "opt14"; OInt "opt15"; OInt &quot...

Split up the huge generator/actions.ml into several smaller files. Rich.