search for: opsec

Hi, I have a box with freebsd 9.1-Stable uname -a FreeBSD master.bogdanturcanu.ro 9.1-STABLE FreeBSD 9.1-STABLE #3: Fri Mar 8 18:43:56 EET 2013 root at master.bogdanturcanu.ro:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/MASTER amd64 The server is connected ussing alc0 interface. If i run: Ifconfig alc0 inet6 x:x:x:x prefixlen 64 it's working. But, if I put in my rc.conf: ifconfig_alc0_ipv6="inet6

...his (minus Received and signature headers, just removed for length) This is the trace: 23: address test 23: starting `:count-ge' match with `i;ascii-numeric' comparator: 23: extracting `to' headers from message 23: parsing address header value `Kurt Jaeger <dovecot at opsec.eu>, dovecot at dovecot.org' 23: address value `dovecot at opsec.eu' 23: address value `dovecot at dovecot.org' 23: extracting `cc' headers from message 23: matching count value `2' 23: with key `2' => 1 23: finishing match with result: matche...

...> value already such a key so that a tcpdump pcap file would be able to descrypt that session ? Sep 29 08:51:30 imap-login: Info: Login: user=<someuser>, method=PLAIN, rip=<someip>, lip=<someotherip>, mpid=63667, TLS, session=<GGF0Nm6wxy0qAQHoAAMAAwAAAAAAAAAB> -- pi at opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 Now what ?

Hi all, I moved from 8.0-RELEASE to last week's -STABLE: $ uname -v FreeBSD 8.1-STABLE #0: Thu Sep 2 16:38:02 SAST 2010 root@XXXXX:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC and all seems well except my network card is unusable. On boot up: em0: <Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection 7.0.5> port 0x3040-0x305f mem 0xe3200000-0xe321ffff,0xe3220000-0xe3220fff irq 10 at device 25.0 on pci0 em0: Setup

Hi! There is a posting public about Intel ethernet adapters and their packets of death: http://blog.krisk.org/2013/02/packets-of-death.html Now, how can we test the EEPROM from FreeBSD, similar to the ethtool of Linux ? Thanks for any pointer! -- pi at opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 7 years to go !

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=bin/152154 It has been suggested to me (by a committer) that I should raise the issue of this PR here on these lists, because the problem described within the PR remains a real problem, and despite my having proposed something that seems to be a perfectly workable fix, no action has been taken on this PR for some years now. Regards, rfg P.S. The

Hi: I could not figure out how to restrict users or other users from certain privileges to execute certain commands in FreeBSD/NanoBSD? What I meant is I want to create a NanoBSD image in which there will be an additional user, say 'admin'. I need to give this new user (admin) some privileges to run some root-can-only-execute commands, but not all (ACL similar to the firmwares in adsl

I need to build up a few servers and routers, and am wondering how FreeBSD 9.1 is shaping up. Will it be likely to be more stable and robust than 9.0-RELEASE? Are there issues that will have to wait until 9.2-RELEASE to be fixed? Opinions welcome. --Brett Glass

On 12/4/13, 9:05 AM, Mark Felder said: ----------------- > There was no alternative; we couldn't keep BIND in base. BIND 9 will > certainly have a EoL before the EoL of FreeBSD 10.x, and we can't use > BIND 10 because it requires importing Python to base. I'm coming more and more to the conclusion that we should have a minimal Python in "base". More and more people

Hi, Did anyone else experience this? With 9.1-BETA1 the boot process freezes, among the last lines with verbose boot are acpi_acad0: On Line acpi_acad0: acline initialization done, tried 1 times after this, dead. What is supposed to happen in the next stage? This laptop worked fine with 9-STABLE to at least february. //per

Hi Everyone, This is off-topic, so please feel free to disregard it, but I'm sending it to this list in the hope that it will reach a largish number of users. I am currently looking at updating some of our advocacy material (which advertises exciting new features like SMP support), and before I do I'd like to get a better feel for why the rest of you are using FreeBSD. If you had to