search for: oppotun

Hi, The reason I ask, is that we (the Debian GNU/Linux CD creation team) are currently contamplating switching to using some form of multi-boot to allow our users the oppotunity to select which kernel to install Debian with.

On Fri, 13 Jul 2018 16:55:23 +0300 Eli Wapniarski via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Opensuse > > Everything is there. > Are you sure, I thought OpenSUSE suffered from the same problem as red-hat, i.e. MIT kerberos, and there wasn't a distro AD DC package available. Rowland

Hi All, I've just rebuild the latest R with the Goto BLAS on our new Intel quad core machines. I did a few basic matrix calculations, and I was very impressed by the performance I saw. I wonder if anyone has a more rigorous benchmarking program for R. I downloaded a old R test/benchmarking program (see below), and this didn't work with the current R, and so I wondered if anyone could

...es like If vectorizer doesn't do it, we'll lose the opportunity. If vectorizer doesn't do it, complexity of performing the optimization goes up significantly. Optimization changes the way vectorization happens (may consider this as part of "lose the oppotunity") They should be different from If vectorizer doesn't do it, it'll add complexity of vectorizer's cost model. Compiler's cost modeling in general is already complex enough since there are many things happening downstream. Adding one more optimization downstream do...

...f vectorizer doesn't do it, we'll lose the opportunity. > If vectorizer doesn't do it, complexity of performing the optimization goes > up significantly. > Optimization changes the way vectorization happens (may consider this > as part of "lose the oppotunity") > They should be different from > If vectorizer doesn't do it, it'll add complexity of vectorizer's cost model. > Compiler's cost modeling in general is already complex enough since there are > many things > happening downstream. Adding one more o...

...vectorizer doesn't do it, we'll lose the opportunity. > If vectorizer doesn't do it, complexity of performing the > optimization goes up significantly. > Optimization changes the way vectorization happens (may > consider this as part of "lose the oppotunity") They should be > different from > If vectorizer doesn't do it, it'll add complexity of vectorizer's cost model. > Compiler's cost modeling in general is already complex enough since > there are many things happening downstream. Adding one more &gt...

...being developed very actively, is stable than racoon and >implemented radical feature. But it is sometime trouble for users >that double racoons are released. It is also wasteful that development >resource is devided. I was thinking that two racoon could be merged. > >There was an oppotunity having a meeting with some of "ipsec-tools" >developers at the IETF 62th in Minneapolis. I told my thought to >the developers. They willingly agreed with my proposal. > >They told me that they could become the formal support team. So the kame >project decided to quit...

Sorry for the spam. Copy-paste didn't capture the Subject properly. Resending with the correct Subject so that the thread is captured properly. -----Original Message----- From: Saito, Hideki Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2016 1:39 PM To: 'llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org' <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> Subject: RE: [llvm-dev] [Proposal][RFC] Strided Memory Access Ashutosh, First,