search for: opportunists

Here is Oplocks Usage Recommendations Whitepaper for Samba on HP-UX (originally was written for CIFS/9000 Server on HP-UX). Note that the intended audience is/are HP-UX customers who have questions and concerns about when to configure oplocks. This is intended as a rudimentry guide to help avoid the most obvious oplock pitfalls. Hopefully the plain text alignments hold up well for most editors.

Goldmine seems to a compiled database application compiled in something likeClipper. Clipper applications record lock through ISAM like files (DBF). However, in Windows NT/2000/XP, Opportunistic locking is turned on by default in order to accelerate file transfer from file services. [Windows 95/98 did not Opportunisticly lock] However, opportunistic locking corrupts ISAM and ISAM like

I'm switching quota backend to redis (from maildir++), so all my current usages are reset. I get that I can do "doveadm quota recalc -A", but it takes forever (and auth processes time out/crash). It would make much more sense to recalc the usage on login if the current usage is unset. Is there no way to do a recalc-quota-on-first-login? Thanks. -- Tom Sommer

On 2016-04-06 20:38, Timo Sirainen wrote: > On 06 Apr 2016, at 13:43, Tom Sommer <mail at tomsommer.dk> wrote: >> >> I'm switching quota backend to redis (from maildir++), so all my >> current usages are reset. >> >> I get that I can do "doveadm quota recalc -A", but it takes forever >> (and auth processes time out/crash). >>

This is an idea from FreeSWAN, which was implemented in the recently released version 1.0. Basically the idea is that FreeSWAN sites automatically encrypt traffic between them when possible, without having to set up the link ahead of time. How this works is: The sites publish some info in DNS. FreeSWAN gets some traffic destined for that site. - looks up the info in DNS - if the info is there:

On 07 Apr 2016, at 14:49, Tom Sommer <mail at tomsommer.dk> wrote: > > On 2016-04-06 21:09, Tom Sommer wrote: >> On 2016-04-06 20:38, Timo Sirainen wrote: >>> On 06 Apr 2016, at 13:43, Tom Sommer <mail at tomsommer.dk> wrote: >>>> I'm switching quota backend to redis (from maildir++), so all my current usages are reset. >>>> I get that

>> Lest anyone think STARTTLS MITM doesn't happen, >> >> https://threatpost.com/eff-calls-out-isps-modifying-starttls-encryption-commands/109325/3/ Right, the attack does happen, but it can be prevented by properly configuring the server and client. >> Not only for security, I prefer port 993/995 as it's just plain >> simpler to initiate SSL from the get-go

Is there any package available for qmail? I am having hard time finding it.

At one point seems like I found a write up in the Dovecot docs about having Dovecot directly listen on port 25 using Opportunistic TLS along with port 587 authentication, so only Dovecot was required to handle incoming email. Said another way, no requirement for Sendmail, or Postfix or EXIM. Just straight up Dovecot. If I'm remembering correctly, someone point me to the correct docs for

IF you are not stuck to IPSec, you might want to take a look at OpenVPN (www.openvpn.org). I found OpenVPN easier to install than FreeSWAN (an IPSEC VPN) and have setup an OpenVPN solution between my German office and our mainoffice in a matter of hours. Thom van der Boon E-Mail: Thom.van.der.Boon at vdb.nl ===== Thom.H. van der Boon b.v. Havens 563 Jan Evertsenweg 2-4 NL-3115 JA Schiedam

If I read this correctly, starttls will fail due to the MITM attack. That is the client knows security has been compromised. Using SSL/TLS, the MITM can use SSL stripping. Since most Postifx conf use "may" for security, the message would go though unencrypted. Correct??? Is there something to enable for perfect forward security with starttls? ? Original Message ? From: s.arcus at

>> static int xmit_skb(struct send_queue *sq, struct sk_buff *skb) >> { >> struct virtio_net_hdr_mrg_rxbuf *hdr; >> @@ -1130,9 +1172,11 @@ static netdev_tx_t start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, >> struct net_device *dev) >> int err; >> struct netdev_queue *txq = netdev_get_tx_queue(dev, qnum); >> bool kick =

>> static int xmit_skb(struct send_queue *sq, struct sk_buff *skb) >> { >> struct virtio_net_hdr_mrg_rxbuf *hdr; >> @@ -1130,9 +1172,11 @@ static netdev_tx_t start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, >> struct net_device *dev) >> int err; >> struct netdev_queue *txq = netdev_get_tx_queue(dev, qnum); >> bool kick =

I am currently using samba 2.3a-12.3 as a PDC, here is my smb.conf [global] netbios name = kidpaddle workgroup = JUDO domain master = yes local master = yes preferred master = yes os level = 255 wins support = yes time server = yes security = user encrypt passwords = yes domain logons = yes domain admin group = root davidj logon drive = H: logon

Debian and Samba Teams: I'm having a really weird problem with Samba 3.0Beta2+RC4 on my Debian Sarge (testing) system with Quickbooks Pro 2002 multi-user version. The version of my question is: Does anybody know what the proper global, share, and permissions settings should be to support multi-user Quickbooks on a Samba share? The Long Version: The Quickbooks data-file resides on it's

Our development team has been having the following issue for quite some time and I cannot isolate the problem. I saw a similar posting in the archives but there are no replies. We are running Samba 2.0.7 on a RedHat 6.2 server and we connect to the server from Windows 2000 desktops. We are editing files through a drive mapped to a share on the server. The problem is when we save the file in the

A little background: The fmuladd intrinsic was introduced to support the FP_CONTRACT pragma in C. llvm.fmuladd.* is generated by clang when it sees an expression of the form 'a * b + c' within a single source statement. If you want to opportunistically form FMA target instructions my inclination would be to skip llvm.fmuladd.* and just form them from a*b+c expressions at isel time. I

On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 12:50 PM, Brian Gerst <brgerst at gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 3:21 PM, Andy Lutomirski <luto at amacapital.net> wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 12:06 PM, Boris Ostrovsky >> <boris.ostrovsky at oracle.com> wrote: >>> After 32-bit syscall rewrite, and specifically after commit 5f310f739b4c >>>

On 03/14/2017 12:53 AM, Rajmohan Banavi wrote: > Is there any package available for qmail? I am having hard time finding it. > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > I doubt it, qmail is quite deprecated and does not support any modern TLS capabilities without a ton of

Am 2017-03-14 10:19, schrieb Alice Wonder: > On 03/14/2017 12:53 AM, Rajmohan Banavi wrote: >> Is there any package available for qmail? I am having hard time >> finding it. >> _______________________________________________ >> CentOS mailing list >> CentOS at centos.org >> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos >> > > I doubt it,