Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "operatour".
Did you mean:
operator
2015 Jul 02
1
boot... round 2
...; It seems your use case needs the whitespaces whereas SYSLINUX
> assumes that they are unwanted.
> This collision of need and software model needs to be
> investigated and solved.
>
>
> Have a nice day :)
>
> Thomas
>
Yeah, I can understand this funky logical "operatourism",
I've already tested it with deletia.
Perhaps syslinux is not the right place to maneuver,
but the challenge for me was to make it less invasive patch,
there.
*If* this is really my user case,
which it really is not - this is the Fedora specificumm,
it would be more like the extlinux...
2015 Jul 02
4
boot... round 2
On 02.07.2015 01:28, Gene Cumm wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 10:14 AM, poma <pomidorabelisima at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 01.07.2015 12:10, Gene Cumm wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 4:35 AM, poma <pomidorabelisima at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> To remind you once again.
>>>> ISOLINUX >= 6.00 built with GCC >= 5.0.0 causes a