search for: operationg

This is just one possible way to fix this bug, but the simplest. Others I considered: - Keeping the network disabled by default. Options like --install wouldn't work and there would be no actionable error message telling users what to do to fix it. - Modifying virt-customize to warn/error/suggest if operations like --install were used but the network was disabled. However

...`%add`: `add i32 nsw %a, %b`. LLVM can take this into account when it is optimizing the `%cmp` and replace it with: `icmp sgt i32 %b, 0`. ## Differences Between LLVM and C/C++ There are some interesting differences between what C++ and C specify and how LLVM behaves with respect to performing an operationg which is not permitted to overflow. Perhaps chief among them is that evaluating an expression in C++ or C which results performs an overflow is undefined behavior. In LLVM, executing an instruction which is marked `nsw` but which violates signed overflow results in poison. Values which have no rel...

In commit ae6f726ecc3bc1b67fd76e51a7b1e1a33d4dcfc0 we started to use the virt-customize code to replace various virt-sysprep operations. This had the effect of adding many more possible operationg to virt-sysprep, but some of them (specifically --install) did not work unless the appliance network is enabled. It was not enabled in virt-sysprep, so these operations never worked. This change enables the network by default, so operations such as --install will now work. For enhanced security...

Hi, I have installed a TDM400P in a PC which runs RedHat Linux 3.2.2-5. There is an FXS module connected to the first slot of TDM400P and an FXO module connected to the fourth slot. This card is detected by the operationg system, which I was able to make sure using the output of lspci command. I modified the configuration files zaptel.conf, zapata.conf and extensions.conf. When I execute the command `ztcfg`, it displays the details of two channels. But if I start asterisk and excute the command `zap show channels...

...o account when it is optimizing the `%cmp` > and replace it with: `icmp sgt i32 %b, 0`. > > ## Differences Between LLVM and C/C++ > > There are some interesting differences between what C++ and C > specify and how LLVM behaves with respect to performing an > operationg which is not permitted to overflow. > > Perhaps chief among them is that evaluating an expression in C++ > or C which results performs an overflow is undefined behavior. In > LLVM, executing an instruction which is marked `nsw` but which > violates signed overflow res...

Hi all ! Let's say you have about 6 small different companies sharing the same E1 / Asterisk server, and every company needs its own fax number. Since they don't really need fax machines, what would be the most cost-effective way to handle this (keeping fax-privacy at its best) ? Is there a way to configure Hylafax or sth & one modem behind an ATA-186 to email faxes to different

...when it is optimizing the `%cmp` and > replace > > it with: `icmp sgt i32 %b, 0`. > > > > ## Differences Between LLVM and C/C++ > > > > There are some interesting differences between what C++ and C specify and > > how LLVM behaves with respect to performing an operationg which is not > > permitted to overflow. > > > > Perhaps chief among them is that evaluating an expression in C++ or C > which > > results performs an overflow is undefined behavior. In LLVM, executing an > > instruction which is marked `nsw` but which violates signe...

...s into account when it is optimizing the `%cmp` and > replace it with: `icmp sgt i32 %b, 0`. > > > > ## Differences Between LLVM and C/C++ > > > > There are some interesting differences between what C++ and C specify and > how LLVM behaves with respect to performing an operationg which is not > permitted to overflow. > > > > Perhaps chief among them is that evaluating an expression in C++ or C > which results performs an overflow is undefined behavior. In LLVM, > executing an instruction which is marked `nsw` but which violates signed > overflow resu...