search for: operandtype_t

Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "operandtype_t".

Did you mean: operandtype
2009 Aug 18
0
[LLVMdev] X86 Disassembler
...r opportunities to use the LLVM small container classes. For instance, the "fOperands" ivar in RecognizableInsn. 8. While we're on that, please use "Instruction" or "Instr" instead of "Insn" for consistency's sake. 9. You have types called "operandType_t", etc. We normally don't use the "_t" suffix for types. Perhaps renaming them. 10. In the "static inline bool outranks(instructionContext_t upper, instructionContext_t lower)", it would be good to assert that upper and lower are strictly less than IC_max. 11. In...
2009 Aug 18
2
[LLVMdev] X86 Disassembler
Dear mailing list: the attached diff implements a table-driven disassembler for the X86 architecture (16-, 32-, and 64-bit incarnations), integrated into the MC framework. The disassembler is table-driven, using a custom TableGen backend to generate hierarchical tables optimized for fast decode. The disassembler consumes MemoryObjects and produces arrays of MCInsts, adhering to the
2009 Aug 19
3
[LLVMdev] X86 Disassembler
...y created. It is always set to point to CodeGenInstruction::OperandList. > 8. While we're on that, please use "Instruction" or "Instr" instead > of "Insn" for consistency's sake. Fixed. Thanks for the heads-up. > 9. You have types called "operandType_t", etc. We normally don't use > the "_t" suffix for types. Perhaps renaming them. Fixed. Now for example operandType_t is OperandType. > 10. In the "static inline bool outranks(instructionContext_t upper, > instructionContext_t lower)", it would be good t...