Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "operaion".
Did you mean:
operation
2016 Mar 23
0
supporting a type but not supporting an operaion
On 3/23/2016 1:51 PM, Rail Shafigulin via llvm-dev wrote:
> i'm looking at
> https://github.com/llvm-mirror/llvm/blob/master/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeDAG.cpp#L2107
> but i don't quite understand the comment. how is it possible for a
> target not to support an operation and yet support a type? can someone
> give an example. i realize the question might sound silly,
2016 Mar 23
2
supporting a type but not supporting an operaion
i'm looking at
https://github.com/llvm-mirror/llvm/blob/master/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeDAG.cpp#L2107
but i don't quite understand the comment. how is it possible for a target
not to support an operation and yet support a type? can someone give an
example. i realize the question might sound silly, but i'm not really
getting it.
any help is appreciated.
--
Rail Shafigulin
2005 May 04
2
exop vs md5
WHat is the significance to Samba of pam_password exop vs pam_password md5 in ldap.conf?
The reason I ask is that, wherever possible, I prefer to use the vendor supplied tools for
manipulating config files. With Fedora 3 it's system-config-authentication and it doesn't
give you the option of exop. You either enable MD5, which puts pam_password md5 in ldap.conf,
or disable it, which puts
2004 Jan 07
1
[LLVMdev] 9 Ideas To Better Support Source Language Developers
On Wed, 2004-01-07 at 11:12, Chris Lattner wrote:
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------
> > 1. Definition Import
> > Source languages are likely to create lots of named type and value
> > definitions for the memory objects the language manipulates. Redefining
> > these in every module produces byte code bloat. It would be very useful